THE ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTRUCTION SECTOR

Yuliya Aleksandrovna Ryzhanushkina

Abstract


The article deals with the main directions of construction sector development under conditions of modern ecological situation. High concentration of industrial facilities and transport in cities has a negative effect on the environment, physical and mental population health. Therefore solution of these problems is a critical issue for the policy design of development of construction in the whole world. There is a radical revision of the scheme of settlement, deurbanization of the territory, transformation of defense and industrial policy, intense
introduction of new materials and construction technologies, mass use of which will drastically reduce human-induced impact on the city and village settlements. The author gives critical estimation of the existing concepts of building sector development, such as the creation of ecovillages, the increasing the number of storeys in buildings and the repartition of industrial facilities from the centre to the outskirts. Building according to ecological standards (green building) is designated in the article as the most perspective concept of construction
sector development. This article presents the main advantages of this construction and brief description of worldwide famous green building standards and certification systems such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM (Environmental Assessment Method). The article describes the features of green building in our country and the reasons of its sluggishness. It is the author's opinion that government development of normative legal base for ecological standards of a building sphere is security blanket of its citizenry and the basis of successful development of construction sector and the entire country.
The environmental aspect is more important today, and ecological criterion should be the basis of the concept of innovative development of construction sector.


Keywords


construction sector, green building, anti-urbanizm, deurbanization, ecovillages, ecological standards.

References


Olsson P., Folke C., Berkes F. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental

management, 2004, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 75–90.

Gornova G.V. [Argumentation in debate of urbanism and anti-urbanism]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo

universiteta [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University]. 2009, no. 33 (171), pp. 41–44. Available at:

http://www.lib.csu.ru/vch/171/007.pdf (in Russ.)

Reshenie problem urbanizatsii – deurbanizatsiey [Solution of the problems of urbanization – deurbanization]. Available

at: http://www.olbany-rick.livejournal.com/41336.html

Meyer W.B. The environmental advantages of cities: countering commonsense antiurbanism. Massachusetts Institute

of Technology, 2013. 105 p.

Petrova I.Yu. Tekhnologicheskie uklady i innovatsionnye protsessy [Technological structures and innovation

processes]. Available at: http://sntt.aspu.ru/images/File/materialy/lekcii.pdf#page=59

Matveychev O.A. Povelitel'noe naklonenie istorii [The imperative of history]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2010. 464 p.

Nathan L.P. Ecovillages, values, and interactive technology: balancing sustainability with daily life in 21st century

America. Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2008, pp. 3723–3728.

Kulyasov I.P., Kulyasova A.A. [The ecovillage is a new form of rural communities in Russia]. Ekologiya i zhizn'

[Ecology and life], 2008, no. 10, pp. 20–26 (in Russ.)

Daniels K. The technology of ecological building: basic principles and measures, examples and ideas. Birkhauser,

304 p.

Koshkina S.Yu., Korchagin O.A., Voronkova E.S. [Green building as a major factor in improving environmental

quality and human health]. Voprosy sovremennoy nauki i praktiki [Problems of contemporary science and practice]. 2013,

no. 3, pp. 150–158. (in Russ.)

Knox N. What is green building? USGBC. Available at: http://www.usgbc.org/articles/what-green-building-0

Kats G.H. Green building costs and financial benefits. Available at: http://staging.community-wealth.org

Roderick Y., McEwan D., Wheatley C., Alonso C. Comparison of energy performance assessment between LEED,

BREEAM and Green Star/ Y. Roderick. Eleventh International IBPSA Conference Building Simulation, 2009, pp. 1167–

Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/

LEED Rating Systems. U.S. Green Building Council. Available at: http://www.usgbc.org/leed#rating

Sukhinina E.A. [Basic provisions and a comparison of international environmental standards in construction industry].

Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Saratov State Technical University].

, no. 1 (73), pp. 209–215. (in Russ.)

Informatsionno-analiticheskiy portal GreenEvolution [Information-analytical portal GreenEvolution]. Available at:

http://www.greenevolution.ru/

Lee W.L., Burnett J. Benchmarking energy use assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and LEED. Building and Environment,

, vol. 43, pp. 1882–1891.

GOST R 54694–2012. Otsenka sootvetstviya. Ekologicheskie trebovaniya k ob"ektam nedvizhimosti [St. Standart R

-2012. Conformity assessment. Environmental requirements for real estate]. Introduced 2012-08-30]. Moscow, Standartinform

Publ., 2012. 36 p.

Novyy natsional'nyy standart: pochemu ekologichnym tekhnologiyam poka ne svetit «zelenyy svet»? [New national

standard: why is green technology not allowed yet] Available at: http://bfm74.ru/industry/realty/zelenie-standarti

Polyakov A. Ekologicheskoe stroitel'stvo v Rossii. Predposylki k razvitiyu i ogranichiteli rosta [Green building in

Russia. Prerequisites to the development and limits to growth]. Available at:

http://greenevolution.ru/analytics/ekologicheskoe-stroitelstvo-v-rossii-predposylki-k-razvitiyu-i-ogranichiteli-rosta/

Internet-portal Zelenyy gorod [Internet portal Green city]. Available at: http://green-city.su/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.