Decision Tree for Mechanism of Antitumor Drugs Action Prediction
Keywords:
antitumor drugs, mechanism of action, structural 3D descriptors, decision treeAbstract
Classification by the mechanism of action of antitumor drugs using quantitative descriptors has been carried out in this study. The dataset of drugs includes 115 compounds with known activity and mechanism of action. The structures have been taken from the National Cancer Institute database. The dataset includes: 30 structures with the mechanism of alkylation action, 23 compounds are topoisomerase I inhibitors, 16 structures are topoisomerase II inhibitors, 17 compounds are DNA/RNA antimetabolites (dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors), 16 molecules are DNA antimetabolites, and 13 compounds are antimitotic drugs. A decision tree has been constructed for determination of each class of the compounds using 3D descriptors that have been computed by MERA software. Analysis of the results has shown that each mechanism of drug action is characterized by a set of descriptors. Important quantum-chemical descriptors of structures with mechanism for alkylation action, DNA/RNA antimetabolites, and DNA antimetabolites have been determined. Quantum-chemical and geometric descriptors for structures of topoisomerase II inhibitors and geometric descriptors for structures of topoisomerase I inhibitors have been established. An important energy descriptor for antimitotic drugs has been determined. The typical descriptor values for active and inactive structures for each mechanism of action have been determined. The quality recognition of active structures for each mechanism of drugs action has been determined. The highest recognition quality value of active and inactive compounds is observed in the decision tree of topoisomerase II inhibitors. The minimal recognition quality value of active and inactive compounds is observed in the decision tree of DNA/RNA-antimetabolites. The suggested decision trees can be used for determination of the action mechanism of antitumor drugs.References
Plewczynski, D. Assessing Different Classification Methods for Virtual Screening / D. Plewczynski, S.A. Spieser, U. Koch // Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. – 2006. – V. 46, № 3. – P. 1098–1106. DOI: 10.1021/ci050519k.
Impact of Learning Set Quality and Size on Decision Tree Performances / M. Sebban, R. Nock, J.H. Chauchat, R. Rakotomalala // International Journal of Computer Science and Security. – 2000. – V. 1, № 1. – P. 85–105. DOI: 10.1.1.62.6365.
Quinlan, J.R. Induction of Decision Trees / J.R. Quinlan // Machine Learning. – 1986. – V. 1, № 1. – P. 81–106. DOI: 10.1007/BF00116251.
Molecular interaction fields: applications in drug discovery and ADME prediction / G. Cruciani, R. Mannhold, H. Kubinyi, G. Folkers. – Weinheim: Wiley WILEY-VCH Verlang GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2005. – 328 p.
Classification and regression trees / L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olshen, C.J. Stone. – Bo-ca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. – 368 p.
Melville, J.L. Machine Learning in Virtual Screening / J.L. Melville, E.K. Burke, J.D. Hirst // Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. – 2009. – V. 12, № 4. – P. 332–343. DOI: 10.2174/138620709788167980.
In silico ADME/Tox: why models fail / T.R. Stouch, J.R. Kenyon, S.R. Johnson et al. // J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. – 2003. – V. 17, № 2–4. – P. 83–92. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025358319677.
Blower, P.E. Decision Tree Methods in Pharmaceutical Research / P.E. Blower, P. Kevin, K.P. Cross // Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. – 2006. – V. 6, № 1. – P. 31–39. DOI: 10.2174/156802606775193301.
Иccледование конфоpмационныx cоcтояний cубcтpатов изофоpмы 3а4 цитоxpома p450 / М.А. Гришина, В.А. Потемкин, А.А. Погребной, Н.Н. Ившина // Биофизика. – 2008. – Т. 53, № 5. – С. 758–765.
Влияние структурных характеристик ингибиторов дигидрофолатредуктазы на их метабо-лические свойства / Е.С. Афонькина, Н.Н. Палько, Г.А. Матвеев и др. // Журнал структурной химии. – 2012. – Т. 53, № 2. – С. 364–371.
National Cancer Institute. – https://dtp.cancer.gov/databases tools/bulk data.htm.
Потемкин, В.А. Модель расчета атомных объемных характеристик в молекулярных системах / В.А. Потемкин, Е.В. Барташевич, А.В. Белик // Журнал физической химии. – 1998. – Т. 72, № 4. – С. 650–656.
Chemosophia s.r.o. – http://www.chemosophia.com.
Potemkin, V.A. Technique for Energy Decomposition in the Study of “Receptor-Ligand” Complexes / V.A. Potemkin, A.A. Pogrebnoy, M.A. Grishina // Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. – 2009. – V. 49, № 6. – P. 1389–1406. DOI: 10.1021/ci800405n.
Метод мультиконформационного моделирования пространственной формы молекулы / Е.В. Барташевич, В.А. Потемкин, М.А. Гришина, А.В. Белик // Журнал структурной химии. – 2002. – Т. 43, № 6. – С. 1112–1119.
Генетический алгоритм для прогноза строения и свойств молекулярных агломератов в органических веществах / М.А. Гришина, Е.В. Барташевич, В.А. Потемкин, А.В. Белик // Журнал структурной химии. – 2002. – Т. 43, № 6. – С. 1120–1125.
Мультиконформационный метод анализа биологической активности молекулярных структур / В.А. Потемкин, Р.М. Арсламбеков, Е.В. Барташевич и др. // Журнал структурной химии. – 2002. – Т. 43, № 6. – С. 1126–1130.
Potemkin, V.A. A new paradigm for pattern recognition of drugs / V.A. Potemkin, M.A. Grishina // J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. – 2008. – V. 22. – P. 489–505. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9203-x.
Potemkin, V. Principles for 3D/4D QSAR classification of drugs / V. Potemkin, M. Grishina // Drug Discovery Today. – 2008. – V. 13, № 21/22. – P. 952–959. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.006.
Potemkin, V. Electron-based descriptors in the study of physicochemical properties of compounds / V. Potemkin, M. Grishina // Computational and Theoretical Chemistry. – 2018. – V. 1123. – P. 1–10. DOI: org/10.1016/j.comptc.2017.11.010.





