SIGNIFICANT FEATURES OF IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF DECISION-MAKING IN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Authors

  • Evgeny Vasilievich Gusev South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/ctcr200313

Keywords:

project technological dependencies model, PTDM, automated control systems, construction fea-tures

Abstract

Aim. The author is considered and analyzed the most important reasons for the instability of managerial decisions in solving problems in construction, for example, scheduling in construction, logistics and construction administration.

Materials and methods. The basis of the research is Project Technological Dependencies Model.

Results. A two-stage method for solving the main task of managing the construction of an object is described. At the first stage the task of distributing the volume of work over time for the planned periods (decade, month, quarter) is solved. At the second stage organizational solutions are developed to build a construction schedule for the facility with distribution from the first step
in mind.

Conclusion. The author suggests using a project technological dependencies model to solve the problems of managing the production activities of a construction organization. This model allows you to expand the field of improving the reliability of management decisions at the planning stage of construction and installation works. Also, this model allows to increase the variability of solutions at the stage of production organization.

Author Biography

Evgeny Vasilievich Gusev, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

профессор кафедры прикладной экономики

References

Гусев Е.В. Технологическое моделирование и сбалансированное планирование строительно-монтажных работ. Челябинск: Редактор, 1990. 147 с.

Baldwin A., Bordoli D. Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling. UK, John Wiley & Sons, 2014. 408 p.

Halpin D.W. Construction Management. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2011. 448 p.

Mincks W., Johnston H. Construction Jobsite Management. Cengage Learning, 2010. 480 p.

Talapov V.V. About The General Scheme of the Information Model of Construction Object. News of higher educational institutions. Construction, 2017, vol. 697, no. 1, pp. 91–97.

Талапов В.В. Три принципа, лежащие в основе BIM. САПР и графика. 2016. № 8 (238). С. 12–15.

Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., Liston K. BIM Handbook. Second edition. N.Y., Wiley, 2011, 626 p.

Bergin M.S. History of BIM. Architecture Research Lab, 2017, pp. 1–6.

Rowlinson S. Building Information Modelling, Integrated Project Delivery and all that. Construction Innovation. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2017. DOI: 10.1108/CI-05-2016-0025.

Volk R., Stengel J., Schultmann F. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Existing Buildings – Literature Review and Future Needs. Automation in Construction, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.aut¬con.2013.10.023.

Isikdag U, Aouad G., Underwood J., Wu S. Building Information Models: a Review on Storage and Exchange Mechanisms. Proceedings of the CIB W78’s 24th International Conference on IT in Construction, 2007, pp. 135–143.

Trani M.L., Cassano M., Minotti M., Todaro D. Construction Site BIM Requirements. Proceedings 30th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2014, 2014, pp. 663–672.

Caldas C.H., Soibelman L. Automating Hierarchical Document Classification for Construction Management Information Systems. Automation in Construction, 2003, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 395–406.

Galloway P.D. Survey of the Construction Industry Relative to the Use of CPM Scheduling for Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132(7), pp. 697–711.

Gusev, E. Construction and Assembly Works Planning: Optimization or Search for Solutions. 3rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE-2017). – SHS Web Conf. Section: Sustainable Development of Industrial Enterprises, 2017, vol. 35, no. 01147, 6. p. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20173501147.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-04

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2020)

Section

Short messages