CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BASED ON MODELING TECHNOLOGY OF OBJECT CONSTRUCTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14529/ctcr210414Keywords:
management, construction management, project management, construction, building, management automationAbstract
The time schedule is the main source of information in construction management. The overall efficiency and success of the project ultimately depends on its quality. At present, the concept of "technology for the construction of an object" is associated with the technological sequence of works of the object, the relationship between them, but there are practically no deep theoretical studies in the field of determining the quantitative relationships between interrelated works. The traditional approach to determining quantitative ratios based on previously adopted organizational decisions is fully justified for organizational and technological planning. But in order to organize the production of work, that is, to make the appropriate organizational decisions for the implementation of specific volumes of work, it is necessary to preliminarily determine these volumes.In the process of determination, technological requirements must be taken into account, which dictate the quantitative relationships between interrelated works. Purpose of the study. Building a model that takes into account technological dependencies in the process of performing construction and installation work. Materials and methods. The work used publications available in open sources on the organization of construction work, as well as regulations used in the Russian Federation, regulating the construction industry. Results. A new concept of construction technology of an object is given, as a quantitative and qualitative assessment of technological links between works, which determine the possibility of planning works and organizing production, depending on the state of the previous ones. This definition allows us to formulate the essence of modeling the construction technology of an object, namely, the establishment of technological links between the works and the determination of the minimum volumes on the previous one, which open up the possibility for planning a technologically interconnected volume on the subsequent work. The article has developed and presented such a model (model of object technological dependencies), which describes the technological interrelationships of works and their quantitative estimates at the beginning and end of works. The possibilities of the model of object technological dependencies in the development of management decisions from the point of view of the general functions of construction management are shown. Conclusion. The described model can successfully serve as a technological basis for planning construction and installation works, making organizational decisions, monitoring the progress of work, as well as developing management decisions in the process of construction production. With its help, you can analyze the progress and status of work in each planning period of the planned year.
References
Голуб, Л.Г. АСУ строительного треста / Л.Г. Голуб, Е.Н. Лященко. – М.: Стройиздат, 1976. – 177 с.
Антанавичюс, К.А. Многоуровневое стохастическое моделирование отраслевых плановых решений / К.А. Антанавичюс. – Вильнюс: Мокслас, 1977. – 246 с.
Антанавичюс, К.А. Моделирование и оптимизация в управлении строительством / К.А. Антанавичюс. – М.: Стройиздат, 1979. – 197 с.
Siu, M.F.F. Resource Supply-Demand Matching Scheduling Approach for Construction Workface Planning / M.F.F. Siu, M.Lu, S.AbouRizk // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2015. – No. 142 (1). – P. 04015048. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001027
Гусев, Е.В. Технологическое моделирование и сбалансированное планирование строительно-монтажных работ / Е.В. Гусев. – Челябинск: РИК «Редактор»: ИПЦ «ПЕЧАТЬ», 1990. – 147 с.
Salem, O. Project Management Practices and Information Technology Research / O. Salem, S. Mohanty // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2008. – No. 134 (7). – P. 501–508. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(501)
Планирование на строительном предприятии / В.В. Бузырев, Е.В. Гусев, И.П. Савельева, И.В. Федосеев; под общ. ред. В.В. Бузырева. – М.: КНОРУС, 2010 – 536 с.
Методические рекомендации по разработке и оформлению проекта организации строительства и проекта производства работ. МДС 12-81.2007 / ЦНИИОМТП. – М.: ФГУП ЦПП, 2007. – 10 с.
O’Connor, J.T. Industrial Project Execution Planning: Modularization versus Stick-Built / J.T. O’Connor, W.J. O’Brien, J. Ouk Choi // Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. – 2015. – No. 21. – P. 04015014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000270
Improved Critical Chain Project Management Framework for Scheduling Construction Projects / G. Ma, A. Wang, N. Li et al. // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2014. – No. 140 (12). – P. 04014055. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000908
Baldwin, A. Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling / A. Baldwin, D. Bordoli. – NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2014. – 432 p.
Horenburg, T. Construction Scheduling and Resource Allocation based on Actual State Data / T. Horenburg, W.A. Günthner // Computing in Civil Engineering. – 2013. DOI: 10.1061/9780784413029.093
Aksyonov, K. Optimization of Scheduling for Construction Corporation / K. Aksyonov, E. Bykov, O. Aksyonova // 2013 4th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation (ISMS). – 2013. – P. 310–314. DOI: 10.1109/ISMS.2013.112
Kim, K. Multiobjective Construction Schedule Optimization Using Modified Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm / K. Kim, J. Walewski, Y. Cho // Journal of Management in Engineering. – 2016. – Vol. 32. – P. 04015038. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000374
Klanšek, U. Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Model for Nonlinear Discrete Optimization of Project Schedules under Restricted Costs / U. Klanšek // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2016. – Vol. 142. – P. 04015088. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001074
Ibadov, N. Technology Selection For Construction Project, With The Use Of Fuzzy Preference Relation / N. Ibadov, J. Rosłon // Archives of Civil Engineering. – 2015. – No. 61 (3). –P. 105–118. DOI: 10.1515/ace-2015-0028
Gusev, E. Construction and Assembly Works Planning Optimization or Search for Solutions / E. Gusev // SHS Web of Conferences. ICIE-2017. – Vol. 35. – P. 01147. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20173501147
Chen, S.M. Simulation and analytical techniques for construction resource planning and schedu¬ling / S.M. Chen, P.H. Chen, L.M. Chang // Automation in construction. – 2012. – No. 21. –P. 99–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.018
Francis, A. Graphical Modelling Classification for Construction Project Scheduling / A. Francis // Procedia Engineering. – 2015. – No. 123. –P. 162–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.073
Gajpal, Y. Enhanced Heuristic for Finance-Based Scheduling of Construction Projects / Y. Gajpal, A. Elazouni // Construction Management and Economics. – 2015. – No. 33 (7). –P. 531–553. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2015.1063676
Гусаков, А.А. Организационно-технологическая надежность строительного производства / А.А. Гусаков. – М.: Стройиздат, 1974. – 254 с.
Lorterapong, P. Construction Scheduling Using the Constraint Satisfaction Problem Method / P. Lorterapong, M. Ussavadilokrit // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. – 2012. – No. 139 (4). –P. 414–422. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000582
Логиновский, О.В. Эффективное управление организационными и производственными структурами / О.В. Логиновский, А.В. Голлай, О.И. Дранко и др.; под ред. О.В. Логиновского. – М.: Инфра-М, 2020. – 456 с. DOI: 10.14529/ctcr200208






