STOCHASTIC MODEL OF CAPACITY TYPE RESOURCE ALLOCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/ctcr260308

Keywords:

capacity-type resources, deterministic optimization problem, stochastic optimization problem, labor productivity, linearization, Taylor series, heuristic algorithms

Abstract

Purpose of the study. The problem of forming a project team to complete tasks of a given complexity within a specified timeframe and with minimal costs is considered. The productivity of each specialist is modeled as a random variable obeying a normal distribution, which leads to the formulation of a stochastic programming problem with a probabilistic constraint. Materials and Methods. The main attention is paid to methods of reducing a stochastic problem to a deterministic equivalent by transforming a probabilistic constraint using the properties of the normal distribution law. This operation allows us to reduce the original problem to a nonlinear form. This circumstance excludes the use of well-tested algorithms. The main complexity of the solution lies in the nonlinearity and integer nature of the variables. Constraint linearization methods, including Taylor series expansion and piecewise linear approximation, are studied, and simple heuristic selection criteria are analyzed. The proposed main solution method is to linearize the nonlinear constraint obtained by transitioning from a probabilistic constraint in linear form to a deterministic version, but in nonlinear form. The paper describes approaches to nonlinear constraint linearization, including Taylor series expansion and piecewise linear approximation. Results. Heuristic criteria for selecting specialists are proposed, taking into account their productivity, cost and labor stability. Four criteria are introduced: an efficiency criterion using two characteristic parameters: productivity and cost; a stability criterion taking into account the standard deviation and productivity; a complex criterion, which is the product of the first two; and a combined criterion taking into account all three factors. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches to solving the original problem are shown. Conclusion. It is shown that taking into account the stochastic nature of individual initial parameters of the problem leads to the need to solve optimization problems of stochastic programming, which presents certain difficulties. In this case, the focus is no longer on obtaining analytical solutions. A practical example demonstrates that accounting for stochasticity leads to increased team size and costs compared to a deterministic case. A conclusion is drawn regarding the need to use combined criteria and iterative algorithms to obtain solutions close to optimal.

Author Biographies

Sergey A. Barkalov, Voronezh State Technical University, Voronezh, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Head of the Department of Management, Dean of
the Faculty of Economics, Management and Information Technologies, Voronezh State Technical University, Voronezh, Russia

Pavel N. Kurochka, Voronezh State Technical University, Voronezh, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Prof. of the Department of Management, Voronezh State Technical University, Voronezh, Russia

References

1. Баркалов С.А. Ресурсное планирование проектного управления: моногр. / С.А. Баркалов, П.Н. Курочка, Л.Д. Маилян, Е.А. Серебрякова. М.: Кредо, 2024. 530 с.

2. Huang W., Li H., Shen Q. Dynamic resource allocation for multi-project construction under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2022. Vol. 148 (4). P. 04022003.

3. Математическая модель выбора поставщика металлообрабатывающего оборудования в условиях необходимости достижения технологического суверенитета / О.В. Логиновский, А.А. Максимов, М.В. Щемлев, А.М. Богер // Системы управления и информационные технологии. 2023.

№ 2 (92). C. 86–92.

4. Sari M., Arditi D. Machine learning-based prediction of labor productivity in construction using site-specific factors // Construction Management and Economics. 2021. Vol. 39 (8). P. 755–772.

5. Новиков Д.А., Иващенко А.А. Модели и методы организационного управления инновационным развитием фирмы. М.: КомКнига, 2006. 332 с.

6. Zhang L., Hu Z. Resource leveling in construction projects using hybrid genetic algorithm and discrete event simulation // Automation in Construction. 2023. Vol. 145. P. 104678.

7. Формирование поколений новой техники как задача о покрытии множества / С.А. Баркалов, В.Н. Бурков, П.Н. Курочка, Е.А. Серебрякова // Проблемы управления. 2023. № 6. С. 22–32. DOI: 10.25728/pu.2023.6.2

8. Shapiro A., Dentcheva D., Ruszczyński A. Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. Third Edition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2021.

9. Balouka N., Cohen I. A robust optimization approach for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem // European Journal of Operational Research. 2021. Vol. 291, iss. 2. P. 457–470. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.052

10. Pinedo M.L. Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems. Springer International Publishing, 2016.

11. Cheng M.Y., Tran D.H. Fuzzy multi-objective particle swarm optimization for resource allocation in large-scale construction projects // Applied Soft Computing. 2021. Vol. 102. P. 107076.

12. Баркалов С.А. Оптимизационные модели – инструмент системного моделирования:

моногр. / С.А. Баркалов, П.Н. Курочка, Л.Д. Маилян, Е.А. Серебрякова. М.: Кредо, 2023. 522 с.

13. Birge J.R., Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.

14. Zou P.X.W., Zhang G., Wang J. Understanding the critical factors influencing the design and construction integration process in China // International Journal of Project Management. 2018. Vol. 36 (3). P. 468–482.

15. Асатурова Ю.М., Хватова Т.Ю. Повышение инновационной активности предприятий в условиях дефицита финансов // Научно-технические ведомости СПбГПУ. Экономические науки. 2019. Т. 12, № 1. С. 132–145. DOI: 10.18721/JE.12111

16. Nikakhtar A., Wong K.K., Zavichi K.G. Particle swarm optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling in construction // Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2019. Vol. 26 (7). P. 1388–1408.

17. Медведев С.Н. Жадные и адаптивный алгоритмы решения задачи маршрутизации транспортных средств с несколькими центрами с чередованием объектов // Автоматика и телемеханика. 2023. № 3. С. 139–168. DOI: 10.31857/S0005231023030078

Published

2026-09-11

Issue

Section

Control in Social and Economic Systems