Operationalization of Technical Quality of Mobile Operating Systems and Embedded Applications

Authors

  • M. A. Nazarenko Moscow Technological University (MIREA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/ctcr190106

Keywords:

quality, mobile information systems, definition, clusters, dynamics, development

Abstract

The article analyzes the technical value of the quality of mobile operating systems. The purpose of the article is the operationalization of this concept, as well as the formation of quality parameters that form it. Earlier in the scientific literature this concept was not formalized and was not defined. Manufacturers of mobile operating systems use the concept of total quality management, TQM. In this connection, the list of quality parameters was formed on the basis of previous studies, as well as archives of the creators of mobile operating systems, Apple and Google, as well as authoritative analytical resources. To achieve this goal, the article used logistic regression analysis, Alpha-Kronbach's method, t-statistics and cluster analysis. As a result of the study, it was found that all the key parameters of the quality of mobile operating systems are internally inconsistent across the entire horizon of existence. 5 clusters of mobile operating systems were formed, the quality parameters of which have internal consistency. The formed clusters are different versions of mobile information systems that actually existed at different times. As a result, the concept of technical quality of the mobile operating system cannot be considered as a final definition, formalized in any form. There is dynamic of the concept development, which reflects the actual quality of the mobile operating system at any time. At any time, the concept of quality is as close as possible to a successful innovative version of the mobile operating system. The development of this concept is based on actually existing at different times the most successful versions of mobile operating systems.

Author Biography

M. A. Nazarenko, Moscow Technological University (MIREA)

канд. физ.-мат. наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой управления качеством и сертификации

References

Arminen I. New Reasons for Mobile Communication: Intensification of Time-Space Geography in the Mobile Era. The Reconstruction of Space and Time, 2017, pp. 89–107. DOI: 10.4324/9781315134499-5

Bagga T., Goyal A., Bansal S. An Investigative Study of the Mobile Operating System and Handset Preference. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2016, no. 9 (35), pp. 130–145. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i35/92545

Böhm S., Adam F., Farrell W.C. Impact of the Mobile Operating System on Smartphone Buying Decisions: A Conjoint-Based Empirical Analysis. International Conference on Mobile Web and Information Systems, 2015, pp. 198–210. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23144-0_18

Moore T., Stouch D. A Generalized Extended Kalman Filter Implementation for the Robot Operating System. Intelligent Autonomous Systems 13, 2017, pp. 335–348. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08338-4_25

Murikipudi A., Prakash V., Vigneswaran T. Performance Analysis of Real Time Operating System with General Purpose Operating System for Mobile Robotic System. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2015, no. 8 (19), pp. 113–127. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i19/77017

Krishna1 S.Y.K., Devarakonda M.G.K. A Survey on Architectures of Mobile Operating Systems: Challenges and Issues. International Journal of Research Studies in Computer Science and Engineering, 2015, no. 3 (2), pp. 73–76.

Zheng P., Ni L.M. Spotlight: the Rise of the Smart Phone. IEEE Distributed Systems Online, 2006, no. 7 (3), pp. 3–3. DOI: 10.1109/mdso.2006.22

Wang C. et al. The Research of Android System Architecture and Application Programming. Computer Science and Network Technology, 2011, no.2, pp. 785–790.

Li X.F. et al. Mobile OS Architecture Trends. Intel Technology Journal, 2012, no. 4 (16), pp. 147–169.

Soldani D., Manzalini A. Horizon 2020 and Beyond: on the 5G Operating System for a True Digital Society. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2015, no. 1 (10), pp. 32–42. DOI: 10.1109/mvt.2014.2380581

Jacobsen K.M. Game of Phones, Data Isn't Coming: Modern Mobile Operating System Encryption and Its Chilling Effect on Law Enforcement. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 2017, no. 85, pp. 56–65. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2856603

Lee W.H. et al. An Analysis of Trusted Service Manager Development Modes by Mobile Operating System Designers in Taiwan. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2015, no. 6 (14), pp. 592–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2015.09.001

Lin F.X., Wang Z., Zhong L. K2: a Mobile Operating System for Heterogeneous Coherence Domains. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 2014, no. 1 (42), pp. 285–300.

Charland A., Leroux B. Mobile Application Development: Web vs. Native. Queue, 2011, no. 4 (9), pp. 20–48. DOI: 10.1145/1966989.1968203

Canlar E.S. et al. Windows Mobile LiveSD Forensics. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2013, no. 2 (36), pp. 677–684. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2012.12.024

Published

2019-02-21

Issue

Section

Communication Technologies and Systems