АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТАРИЙ ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИИ  РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫХ СПЕЦИАЛИЗАЦИЙ: РОССИЙСКИЙ  И ЗАРУБЕЖНЫЙ ОПЫТ. ЧАСТЬ 2

Irina V. Danilova; Natalya V. Pravdina

Authors

Irina V. Danilova South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
Natalya V. Pravdina South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Keywords:

regional specializations, effective specializations, promising specializations, smart specializations, economic specializations of regions, methods of evaluating specializations of regions

Abstract

The request for new strategic guidelines in the development of regions in the context of the instability of foreign economy, digitalization and the change of the technological paradigms, in the modern conditions, is of not only theoretical interest, but to a greater extent of an applied one as well. Foresight analysis and the search for promising fields of development adapted to the conditions of the differentiation of economic space in Russia are related to the necessity of an objective evaluation of the situations in regions, of determining the factors of economic growth, and new relevant mechanisms and tools of government policy. This article continues to analyze Russian and foreign publications in the context of the evolution of the theory of economic specializations of regions; thus, the changes in the methodological approaches to studying of this field. This paper systematizes the techniques of diagnosing the status and the shifts in the specializations of territorial areals in the context of the influence of the factors and their development: effectiveness and innovativeness of the sector-related activity, market and export competitiveness of production, and spatial characteristics explained by the specifics of the localization and concentration of enterprises in a region. A method of express evaluation of economic specializations has been tested for the purpose of prompt monitoring and identification of the support zones, including with the interest to correcting the state programs being fulfilled. Integral indices have been calculated for economic specializations of the profile type of activity of four regions with the initially similar economy structure (Lipetsk, Vologda, Chelyabinsk regions, and Krasnoyarsk Territory), as well as a comparative analysis of the changes in the status of mono-sector has been performed.

Author Biographies

Irina V. Danilova, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Regional Economics, and State and Municipal Government

Natalya V. Pravdina, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Associate Professor of the Department of Industrial Economics and Project Management

References

Santoalha, A. New indicators of related diver-sification applied to smart specialization in Europe-an regions / A. Santoalha // Spatial Economic Analy-sis. – DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2019.1584328

Cornett, A. A new regional balance: Regional specialization and growth: An analysis of spatial divergence in Northern Europe / A. Cornett // 55th Congress of the European Regional Science Associa-tion: “World Renaissance: Changing roles for people and places”, 25–28 August 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve.

Нехорошева, Л.Н. Концептуальные подхо-ды, методы и инструменты кластерной политики в республике Беларусь и Польше: сравнительный анализ / Л.Н. Нехорошева, Э. Хостилович / Бело-русский экономический журнал. – 2015. – № 4. –

P. 4–22.

Goschin, Z. Regional specialization and geo-graphic concentration of industries in Romania / Z. Goschin, D.L. Constantin, M. Roman, B. Ileanu // The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies. – http://www.asecu.gr/files/RomaniaProceedings/27.pdf

Pylaka, K. Identifying industries requiring spatial and sectoral relationships to develop: Do smart specializations always work? / K. Pylaka, D. Majereka // 13th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management, GCMM 2016. Procedia Engineer-ing. – Poland, 2017. – P. 1119–1127.

Carayannis, E. Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness / E. Carayannis, E. Grigo¬roudis // Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 10, no 1, pp. 31–42. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42.

Стрябкова, Е.А. Развитие методических подходов к определению приоритетов «умной специализации» территорий / Е.А. Стрябкова, Ю.В. Лыщикова // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, зав-тра. – 2019. – Т. 9, № 12А. – С. 73–82. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.92.12.037

Bosch, A. Smart Specialization as a Tool to Foster Innovation in Emerging Economies: Lessons from Brazil / A. Bosch, N. Vonortas // Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 13, no 1, pp. 32–47. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.1.32.47

Vu, K.M. Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies / K.M. Vu // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. – 2017. – V. 41. – P. 64–77.

Sipiliva, V. When regional growth does not benefit from high-tech specialization? Explaining the experience of Latvian regions / V. Sipilova // 3rd Economics & Finance Conference, Rome, Italy, April 14–17, 2015 and 4th Economics & Finance Confer-ence, London, UK. – August 25–28, 2015.

Дронова, Я.И. Применение анализа «за-траты-выпуск» для идентификации кластеров в экономике / Я.И. Дронова, С.М. Бухонова // Вест-ник Белгородского университета кооперации, эко-номики и права. – 2014. – № 1. – C. 207–215.

Гнидченко, А.А. Использование таблиц «затраты-выпуск» для анализа и прогнозирования секторальной структуры экономики России /

А.А. Гнидченков, Д.И. Галимова, В.А. Сальников // Проблемы прогнозирования. – 2018. – № 6.

Navarro, M. Regional benchmarking in the smart specialisation process: Identification of refer-ence regions based on structural similarity / M. Na-varro, J.J. Gibaja, S. Franco, A. Murciego, C. Gian-elle, F.B. Hegyi, A. Kleibrink // S3 Working Paper Series No. 03/2014.

Boschma, R. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product-relatedness / R. Boschma, M. Asier, N. Mikel // Economic Geography. – Vol. 89. – P. 29–51.

Farra, F. Improving regional performance in Russia: a capabilitybased approach / N. Klos, U. Schober, O. Sigalova, A. Zhukov // European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. – https://www.ebrd. com/downloads/research/economics/workingpapers/wp0155.pdf.

Каукин, А.С. Структура и продуктив-ность Российского экспорта / соавт.: Л.М. Фрейнкман // Экономическая политика. – № 5. – 2009. – C. 99–117.

Кадочников, С.М. Корзина роста: пер-спективные экспортные отрасли российской эко-номики / С.М. Кадочников, М.А. Коновалова // Пашкусовские чтения, ВШМ СПбГУ, 30 октября 2009 г.

Апокин, А. Потенциал импортозамещения и выгоды от интеграции в ЕАЭС: дезагрегирован-ные оценки / А. Апокин, А. Гнидченко, Е. Сабельни-кова. – 2016.

Колмаков, В.В. Развитие кластеров на ос-нове конкурентной специализации регионов / В.В. Колмаков, А.Г. Полякова, С.В. Карпова, А.Н. Голо-вина // Экономика региона. – 2019. – Т. 15, вып. 1. – С. 270–284.

Ellison, G. The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomera-tion? / G. Ellison, E. Glaeser // American Economic Review. – 1999. – Vol. 89, № 2. – P. 311–316

Duranton, G. Exploring the detailed location patterns of UK manufacturing industries using mi-crogeographic data / G. Duranton, H. Overman // Journal of Regional Science. – 2008. – Vol. 48, № 1. –

P. 213–243.

Ketels, C. Methodology and Findings Report for a Cluster Mapping of Related Sectors / C. Ketels, S. Protsiv // European Cluster Observatory report, Center for Strategy and Competitiveness, Stockholm School of Economics, 2016.

Проект Стратегии пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года. – https://www.spsss.ru/assets/files/2018/v-

nts_strategiya-prostranstvennogo-razvitiya.pdf

Cluster Mapping. Mapping a nation of re-gional clusters. – https://www.clustermapping.us; Картирование кластеров США

Liang, J. Technology intensity and agglom-eration economies / J. Liang, S.J. Goets // Research Policy. – 2018. – V. 47. – P. 1990–1995.

Ряпухина, В.Н. Инструментарий оценки степени локализации инновационной деятельно-сти в регионе / В.Н. Ряпухина // Креативная эко-номика. – 2018. – Т. 12, № 7. – С. 953–964. DOI: 10.18334/ce.12.7.39258

Bergman, E. Industrial and Regional Clus-ters: Concepts and Comparative Applications / E. Bergman, E. Feser // The Web Book of Regional Sci-ence / Ed. S. Loveridge. Morgantown, WV: West Vir-ginia University. – http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/ Bergman-Feser/ contents.htm.

Hallet, M. (2000) Regional Specialization and Concentration in the EU. Brussels: European Economy – Economic Papers 2008–2015 from Direc-torate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN). – https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ publications/pages/publication10530_en.pdf.

Capozza, С. Local industrial structure, ag-glomeration economies and the creation of innova-tive start-ups: evidence from the Italian case, Entre-preneurship & Regional Development / С. Capozza, S. Salomone, E. Somma. – DOI: 10.1080/ 08985626.2018.1457087.

European Cluster Observatory. – http://www. Clusterobservatory.eu.

Zemtsov, S. Potential High-Tech Сlusters in Russian Regions: From Current Policy to New Growth Areas / S. Zemtsov, V. Barinova, A. Pankratov, E. Kutsenko // Foresight and STI Governance. – Vol. 10, no 3. – P. 34–52.

Исследование кластерной среды в Сверд-ловской области, 2018 г. – http://www.acexpert.ru/ analytics/projects/issledovanie-klasternoy-sredi-v-sverdlovskoy-oblas.html.

Гришина, И.В. Стратегия пространствен-ного развития России: методические подходы к разработке экономического блока / И.В. Гришина, А.О. Полынев, А.В. Шкуропат, А.В. Котов. – М.: ВАВТ. 2018 с.281.

Котов, А.В. Умная специализация региона – вариант решения для России: научный очерк / А.В. Котов, И.В. Гришина, А.О. Полынев. − М.: ВАВТ, 2019. − 60 с.