ОЦЕНКА ПОТЕНЦИАЛА ВНЕШНЕЙ ТОРГОВЛИ РЕГИОНА  НА ОСНОВЕ СТРУКТУРНО-ДИНАМИЧЕСКОГО АНАЛИЗА  ТОВАРНЫХ ПОТОКОВ

Irina P. Kilina; Evgeny A. Stepanov; Ksenia Y. Nesytykh; Olga A. Bogdanova

Authors

Irina P. Kilina South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
Evgeny A. Stepanov South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
Ksenia Y. Nesytykh South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
Olga A. Bogdanova South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Keywords:

labor productivity, foreign trade of the region, foreign economic potential of the region, export potential of the region, foreign economic policy of the region, structural-dynamic analysis, ABC-XYZ analysis

Abstract

The strategic task of the Russian Federation is to increase labor productivity, which is indicated by the corresponding national project. One of the key areas of the national project "Labor productivity" is the development of Russian exports. The purpose of this study is to identify the goods-drivers of growth in labor productivity in the region based on the potential for the development of foreign economic activity in the context of macroeconomic instability. To achieve this goal, a methodology has been developed for assessing the potential of foreign trade as a source of growth in labor productivity, including: determining the degree of importance for the region of the foreign economic sector, assessing the region's involvement in international trade and the region's position in the all-Russian indicators of foreign trade; structural and dynamic analysis of commodity flows in the region based on the ABC-XYZ method; detailed analysis of product groups – potential sources of growth in the context of geographic structure, identifies trends in diversification and dynamics in relation to importing countries. The presented technique has been tested on the example of the Chelyabinsk region. For the analysis, the data of the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation, the Federal Customs Service for the period from 2006 to 2020 were used. Based on the results obtained, recommendations were developed for regional authorities in terms of intensifying the region's foreign economic activity. So, the results of the analysis showed that the Chelyabinsk region needs to pay attention to both promising commodity groups – 87 (AY), 68 (BX), 39 (BY), 90 (BY), 15 (BZ), 44 (BZ) TNVED EAEU, and to strengthen ties with the CIS countries, taking into account the interest in the region's products in non-CIS countries

Author Biographies

Irina P. Kilina, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Customs Affairs (national research university)

Evgeny A. Stepanov, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Customs Affairs (national research university)

Ksenia Y. Nesytykh, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Lecturer of the Department of Customs

Olga A. Bogdanova, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Regional Economics, State and Municipal Management

References

Allam Z. Chapter 9 – Oil, Health Equipment, and Trade: Revisiting Political Economy and Interna-tional Relations During the COVID-19 Pandemic / Z. Allam // Surveying the Covid-19 Pandemic and its Implications. – Elsevier. – 2020. – Р. 119–127.

Amadi, L. Globalization and the changing lib-eral international order: A review of the literature, Re-search in Globalization. – 2020. – Vol. 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100015.

Bělín M. Which sanctions matter? analysis of the EU/russian sanctions of 2014 / B. Matěj, J. Ha-nousek // Journal of Comparative Economics. – 2020. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2020.07.001.

Brandi. C. Do environmental provisions in trade agreements make exports from developing countries greener? / C. Brandi, J. Schwab, A. Berger, J.-F. Morin // World Development. – 2020. – Vol. 129.– DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104899.

Kramarz, F. Volatility in the small and in the large: The lack of diversification in international trade / F. Kramarz, J. Martin, I. Mejean // Journal of Inter-national Economics. – 2020. – Vol. 122.– DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.103276.

Parteka, A. What drives cross-country differ-ences in export variety? A bilateral panel approach / A. Parteka, Economic Modelling. – 2020. – Vol. 92.– pp. 48-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.07.001.

Андреева, Е.Л. Внешнеторговые связи Свердловской области и их перспективы с учётом новых ориентиров развития несырьевого экспорта / Е.Л. Андреева, А.О. Соболев, А.В. Ратнер // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник. – №. 2. – 2017. – С. 55–70.

Гулин, К.А. Активизация экономического роста в регионах РФ на основе стимулирования развития несырьевого экспорта / К.А. Гулин, Н.О. Якушев, Е.А. Мазилов // Экономические и соци-альные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. –

№ 3. – 2018. – С. 57–70.

Растворцева, С.Н. Внешнеэкономическая

деятельность как фактор развития российских регионов / С.Н. Растворцева, Е.Э. Колчинская // Экономика. Информатика. – № 22-1 (165). – 2013. –

С. 13–24.

Широкова, Е.Ю. Поддержка региональной экспортной деятельности (кейсы регионов-лидеров по росту экспортной квоты) / Е.Ю. Широкова // Научный вестник Южного института менеджмента. – № 1. – 2019. – С. 39–52.