ASSESSMENT OF MIGRATION ATTRACTIVENESS OF ARKHANGELSK REGION BASED ON A BALANCED SCORECARD
Keywords:
migration, migration attractiveness, Arkhangelsk Region, balanced scorecardAbstract
Population migration significantly affects the population reproduction and the amount of labor resources in the territory of departure and arrival. In modern realities, when the demographic situation and economic development are priority tasks in the Russian Federation, the study of the migration attractiveness of regions becomes of particular importance. Often, migration attractiveness is associated only with absolute and relative indicators of migration, while a comprehensive assessment can only be provided by a balanced scorecard (BSC). In this regard, the aim of this study is to analyze migration attractiveness using a specially developed BSC. The study is novel in that the authors use the BSC to characterize the migration attractiveness, the validity of which has a statistical confirmation. The practical importance of this research consists in identifying the relationship between specific socio-economic indicators and migration balance of the region, which enables authorities to predict the migration gain (loss), as well as the influence and adjustment of the measures for the formation of the parameters necessary for the economic and migration growth of the population.
References
Воробьева О.Д., Топилин А.В., Гребенюк А.А., Лебедева Т.В. Анализ миграционных процессов по данным переписей населения в России // Экономика региона. – 2016. – Т. 12, Вып. 1. –
С. 175–188.
Рыбачкова А.В. Современная оценка миграционной привлекательности регионов Центральной России и Поволжья // Современные проблемы науки и образования. – 2014. – № 6. – С. 597.
Simpach O., Dotlacilova P. Analysis of Migra-tion Attractiveness of the Regions in the Czech Re-public during 2007–2011 // Region in the Develop-ment of Society. – 2013. – P. 322–335.
Денисов Е.А. Миграционные процессы в городах Российского Севера в 1990–2010-е гг. // Региональные исследования. – 2017. – № 2(56). – С. 44–55.
Вдовина Э.Л., Круглова А.В. Оценка ми-грационной привлекательности депрессивных ре-гионов средней России // Известия ПГПУ им. В.Г. Белинского. – 2009. – № 14 (18). – С. 105–110.
Кельник А.В. Миграционная привлекательность региона: показатели и особенности оценки // Вестник Полоцкого государственного университета. Серия D: Экономические и юридические науки. – 2008. – № 10. – С. 41–46.
Myakshin V.N., Petrov V.N. Evaluating The Investment Attractiveness Of A Region Based On The Balanced Scorecard Approach // Regional Science Inquiry. – 2019. – № 11(1). – P. 55–64.
Stillwell J., Bell M., Ueffing P. et al. (4 more au-thors) Internal migration around the world: comparing distance travelled and its frictional effect // Environ-ment and Planning A. – 2016. – № 48(8). –
P. 1657–1675.
Tarasyev A.A., Jabbar J.B. Dynamic Modeling of Labor Migration Impact on the Economic System Development // IFAC PapersOnLine. – 2018. – № 51–32. – P. 407–412.
Hickey M. Modernisation, Migration, and Mobilisation: Relinking Internal and International Migrations in the ‘Migration and Development Nexus’ // Population, space and place. – 2015. DOI: 10.1002/psp.1952.
Zelinsky W. The Hypothesis of the Mobility Transition // Geographical Review. – 1971. – Vol. 61, No. 2. – P. 219–249.
Yormirzoev M.M. Determinants of regional migration flows from former soviet republics to Russia // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seria Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy. – 2015. – № 1(24). – P. 14–19.
Dao T.H., Docquier F., Parsons C., Peri G. Mi-gration and Development: Dissecting the Anatomy of the Mobility Transition // IZA Discussion Papers. – 2016. – No. 10272.
Kviatek-Soltys A. Migration attractiveness of small towns in Malopolska province // Bulletin of Ge-ography. Socio-economic Series. – 2006. – №5/2006. – P. 155–160.
Рыбаковский Л.Л. Факторы и причины ми-грации населения, механизм их взаимосвязи //
Народонаселение. – 2017. – № 2(76). – С. 51–61.
Сабетова Т.В. Факторы миграционной привлекательности стран и регионов // Образование, наука и производство. – 2014. – №4. – С. 36–41.
Bertoli S., Moraga J. F-H. Multilateral re-sistance to migration // Journal of Development Eco-nomics. – 2013. – №102. – P. 79–100.
Niedomysl T. How migrants with “choices” choose their destination: towards a conceptual framework of place attractiveness in a migration con-text. Paper for the ENHR conference in Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2–5 July 2006. – Р. 1–16.
Айвазян С.А. Анализ качества и образа жизни населения (эконометрический подход). ЦЭМИ РАН – М: Наука, 2012. – 432 с.
Карачурина Л.Б. Межрегиональная ми-грация и социально-экономическая дифференциация пространства современной России // Проблемы прогнозирования. – 2006. – № 3. – С. 96–115.
Огородников П.И., Макарова Н.А. Моделирование миграционных потоков в регионе // Экономика региона. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 168–176.
