ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ СОЗДАНИЯ ПРОМЫШЛЕННО-ПРОИЗВОДСТВЕННЫХ ОСОБЫХ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ ЗОН В РЕГИОНАХ РОССИИ

Victoria P. Deeva

doi:10.14529/em260113

Authors

Victoria P. Deeva South Ural State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/em260113

Keywords:

special economic zones, spatial development institutions, preferential treatment, regional conditions, industry specialization

Abstract

The article discusses the feasibility of establishing industrial production special economic zones in the regions of Russia in modern conditions. The study aims to identify the potential of the subjects of the Russian Federation for the placement of zones whose activities are capable of ensuring accelerated economic growth of territories and achieving national development goals. The hypothesis assumes that investment projects within the framework of the institute of a special economic zone of an industrial and industrial type are implemented with great economic effect if the region of the zone is characterized by high startup potential. The methodology is based on the analysis of official regional statistics, information on the budgetary provision of subjects, as well as the results of the assessment of the quality of state financial management and regulatory impact. The author developed a system of regional criteria for the creation of industrial production zones, including managerial, financial and economic criteria. A detailed survey was conducted of the subjects of the Russian Federation that do not have active zones of the type in question at the beginning of 2024. The results of the study demonstrated that the effectiveness of potential zones depends not only on the parameters of investment projects, but also on mesoeconomical conditions. The Vologda, Chelyabinsk and Belgorod regions were recognized as the most promising sites meeting all the developed criteria. The Ryazan Region and the Republic of Mordovia also have sufficient potential. Introducing the proposed methodology for assessing regional potential at the planning stage of the development of special economic zones will minimize the risk of their inefficient functioning. The establishment of special economic zones of industrial type in a num-ber of regions in 2024–2025 strongly confirms the practical significance and reliability of the proposed methodology for assessing regional potential.

Author Biography

Victoria P. Deeva, South Ural State University

Lecturer of the Department of Economic security

References

Андреева С.Н. Устойчивое развитие территории с учетом тенденций перехода к «зеленой» экономике // Экономическая политика и финансовые ресурсы. 2023. Т. 2, № 4. С. 10–17. URL: https://doi.org/10.53315/2949-1177-2023-2-4-10-17.

Гасанов Э.А., Костяная Т.Ю. Развитие малого технологического предпринимательства в координатах территории опережающего развития // Ученые заметки ТОГУ. 2025. Т. 16, № 1. С. 173–177.

Гончаренко Л.И. Конструктив преференциальных налоговых режимов как детерминанта привлечения инвестиций в инновационное развитие России // Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2024. Т. 17, № 3.

С. 156–166. URL: https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2024-17-3-156-166.

Захарова К.А., Бабурина Н.А. Развитие организаций малого и среднего предпринимательства в регионах России: кластерный анализ с учетом экономического развития территории // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2023. Т. 16, № 4. С. 109–130. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.6.

Ильяева Ю.М. Развитие устойчивой дестинации как инструмент повышения конкурентоспособности территории // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. 2023. Т. 13, № 7-1. С. 35–41. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.34670/AR.2023.72.65.004.

Некрасова Е.А., Стрельникова Т.Д. Влияние глобальных климатических изменений на соци-ально-экономическое развитие территории России и зарубежных стран // ЭФО: Экономика. Финансы. Общество. 2023. № 1(5). С. 25–38. URL: https://doi.org/10.24412/2782-4845-2023-5-25-38.

Пьянкова С.Г., Ергунова О.Т., Митрофанова И.В. Влияние транспортной инфраструктуры на устойчивое развитие территории в условиях нестабильности // Геополитика и экогеодинамика регионов. 2023. Т. 9, № 1. С. 44–57.

Урунов А.А., Морозова И.М. Методология оценки качества экономического пространства региона // Регионология. 2024. Т. 32, № 1(126). С. 48–70. URL: https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.126.032.202401.048-070.

Fantechi F., Fratesi U. Spatial patterns of territorial competitiveness: The role of peripherality, urbanization and physical geography // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2024. Vol. 91. 101754. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101754.

Rapetti C., Pique J., Etzkowitz H., Miralles F., Duran J. Development of Innovation Districts: A Performance Assessment. // Triple Helix. 2023. Vol. 10, Iss. 1. P. 77–124. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1163/21971927-bja10040.

Salder J. Reading the relational local economy: Regional governance and the rescaling of local dynamics. // Geoforum. 2023. Vol. 144. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103785.

Schouten P., Bachmann J. Infrastructural frontiers: Terrains of resistance at the material edge of the state // Geoforum, 2022. Vol. 136. P. 219–224. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.06.002.

Toma P., Laurens P. Regional development and intellectual capital: Unveiling the innovation-tradition dilemma // Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2024. Vol. 96. 102087. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.seps.2024.102087.

Vaquero-Piñeiro C., Salvatici L., Zago A. Synergies among ownership forms and cooperating territories: The case of wine // Food Policy. 2025. Vol. 135. 102938. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foodpol.2025.102938.

Vidoli F., Sacchi A., Carrera E. Spatial regimes in heterogeneous territories: The efficiency of lo-cal public spending // Economic Modelling. 2025. Vol. 151. 107139. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.econmod.2025.107139