USE OF STATISTICAL METHODS AND METHODS OF IMITATION MODELING IN THE ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATION PROCESSES RISKS

Authors

  • Vladislav L Izhevsky Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (Magnitogorsk)
  • Nadezhda V Atapina Credit Ural Bank (Joint Stock Company) (Magnitogorsk)
  • Vladimir N Kononov Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (Magnitogorsk)

Keywords:

consolidation, consolidation processes, risks, risk-management, imitation modeling, Monte-Carlo method.

Abstract

Consolidation processes, which are processes of the companies’ growth implemented by including other functioning economic entities into their structure, have become an integral part of the development of large corporate structures. At the same time, the long terms and cost of consolidation carry high risks of inefficiency of the consolidation process results, which is confirmed by the empirical studies. Therefore, an extremely relevant task is to quantify the risks for making a decision on the expedience of the consolidation process. The analysis of modern methodological apparatus for risk assessment shows that the most objective and accurate results can be achieved by using statistical methods and methods of simulation. To test the methods, the key risk factors that influenced the consolidation result were identified. They were classified into two groups: market risks, related to the change in the sensitivity of the group of business units to the external environment before and after consolidation, and investment risks, associated with the reassessment of a possible synergistic effect and underestimation of the emerging costs of consolidation and payment of a control premium. On the basis of data on a large industrial corporation, a financial model of consolidation results was constructed, based on net discounted cash flows before and after consolidation. The results obtained during the approbation can serve as an indirect explanation of the high proportion of inefficient consolidation processes: statistical probable deviations of the indicators as a result of the onset of risk situations completely overlap the possible benefits of consolidation.

Author Biographies

Vladislav L Izhevsky, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (Magnitogorsk)

postgraduate student, Department of Accounting and Economic Analysis, Institute of Economics and Management

Nadezhda V Atapina, Credit Ural Bank (Joint Stock Company) (Magnitogorsk)

Senior Economist, Corporate Credit Department

Vladimir N Kononov, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (Magnitogorsk)

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor of the Department of Accounting and Economic Analysis, Institute of Economics and Management

References

Хусаинов, З.И. Оценка эффективности сде-

лок слияний и поглощений: интегрированная ме-

тодика / З.И. Хусаинов // Корпоративные финан-

сы. – 2008. – № 1 (5). – С. 12–33.

Иванов, А.Е. Генезис синергетического под-

хода в исследованиях слияний и поглощений: развен-

чание главного мифа о синергии / А.Е. Иванов // Фи-

нансы и кредит. – 2013. – № 42 (570). – С. 69–78.

Damodaran, A. Investment valuation: Tools

and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Assets

/ A. Damodaran. – Wiley, 2011.

Gaughan, P.A. Mergers, Acquisitions, and

Corporate Restructurings / P.A. Gaughan. – 4th ed.

John Wiley & Sons, 2007.

Ендовицкий, Д.А. Историко-логический

анализ возникновения и развития интеграционных

процессов в бизнесе / Д.А. Ендовицкий, И.В. Полу-

хина // РИСК. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 209–214.

Graaf A., Pienaar A.J. Synergies in mergers

and acquisitions // SA Journal of Accounting Research.

– 2013. – №1 (27). – Р. 143–180.

Атапина, Н.В. Сравнительный анализ ме-

тодов оценки рисков и подходов к организации

риск-менеджмента / Н.В. Атапина, В.Н. Кононов

// Молодой ученый. – 2013. – № 5. – С. 235–243.

Сазонов, А.А. Применение метода Монте-

Карло для моделирования экономических рисков в

проектах / А.А. Сазонов, М.В. Сазонова // Наука и

современность. – 2016. – № 43. – С. 228–232.

Nicholas Metropolis, Stanislaw Ulam. The

Monte Carlo method // Journal of American Statistical

Association. – 1949. – Vol. 44, № 247. – P. 335–341.

Соболь, И.М. Метод Монте-Карло / И.М.

Соболь. – М.: Наука, 1968. – 64 с.

Лукашов, А.В. Метод Монте-Карло для

финансовых аналитиков: краткий путеводитель /

А.В. Лукашов // Управление корпоративными фи-

нансами. – 2007. – № 1(19). – C. 22–39.

Eckstein J., Riedmueller S.T. YASAI: Yet Another

Add-In for teaching elementary Monte Carlo

simulation in Excel // RUTCOR Research Report. –

– № 27.

Иванов, А.Е. Синергетический оптимизм в

российских интеграционных сделках: промышлен-

ный аспект / А.Е. Иванов, Е.Ю. Саломатина //

Экономический анализ: теория и практика. –

– № 7 (406). – С. 44–56.

Рид, С.Ф. Искусство слияний и поглоще-

ний / С.Ф. Рид, А.Р. Лажу. – 6-е изд. – М.: Альпи-

на-Паблишер, 2011. – 960 с.

Roger Buehler, Dale Griffin, Johanna Peetz

The Planning Fallacy: Cognitive, Motivational, and

Social Origins // Advances in Experimental Social

Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 43. – Р. 1–62.

Published

2018-03-20

Issue

Section

Economics and finance