MODERNIZATION OF LABOR RELATIONS ON THE BASIS OF LABOR DEMOCRACY AT ENTERPRISES OF DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Keywords:
labor democracy, participation in management, remuneration, decision-making, feedback, publicity, enrichment of labor, delegation of authority, small production groups, quality control circles, autonomous brigades.Abstract
The article is devoted to the foreign experience of workers' labor democracy, which shows the main theoretical prerequisites that must be taken into account when modernizing labor relations. The main conditions for the creation of labor democracy are reflected: publicity, information transparency, feedback, remuneration, employee involvement in decision-making, delegation of administration rights to employees. Examples are given from the experience of American, Swedish, Japanese enterprises on the introduction of various forms of labor democracy in labor relations. The most widespread forms of labor democracy implementation, which have become most effective, are quality control circles, small production groups, and autonomous brigades. The advantages and disadvantages of this or that form of labor democracy are shown. Special education activities that will allow workers to adapt in the forms of labor democracy are proposed. As experience of the enterprises show, the introduction of labor democracy in various forms improves the quality of working life by enriching the collective and individual labor of workers.References
Tannenbaum R., Schmidt W. How to Choose a Leadership Pattern // Harvard Business Review. – 1958. – С. 95–101.
Lawler E.E. High Involvment Management. – Jossey-Bass, 1986. – С. 35. 3. Pascarella P. Quality Circles // Industry Week. – 1982. – V. 213 (7). – С. 50–53.
Trist E.L., Bamforth K. W. Some Social Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting // Human Relations. – 1951. – V. 4. – C. 3–38. DOI: 10.1177/001872675100400101
Team Work. Work Study. – 1990. – V. 6. – C. 18.
Schlesinger L. A. Quality of Work Life and the Supervisor. – New York: Praeger, 1982. – C. 33–34.
Булыгин М.М. Стимулирование труда в США // Человек и труд. – 2005. – № 5. – С. 32.
Грачев М.В. Суперкадры. Управление персоналом в международной корпорации. – М., 2003. – С. 85–87.
Директива 2001/86/ЕС Совета от 8 октября 2001 г. о дополнении статута Европейского
общества в отношении участия работников // Вестник ЕС. – № 294. – С. 22.
Директива Европейского Парламента и Совета 2002/14/ЕС от 11 марта 2002 г. об установлении общих положений об информировании и консультировании работников в Европейском Сообществе (OJ 2002 L 080/29). – Система Гарант: http://base.garant.ru/2564500/
Ключко В.Н. Германская модель корпоративного управления: генезис, особенности и тенденции// Менеджмент в России и за рубежом. – 2006. – № 6. – С. 34.
Лукашин А.В. Сравнительные корпоративные финансы и корпоративное управление // Управление корпоративными финансами. – 2005. – № 3. – С. 5.
Малинкин А. Рейнский капитализм // Отечественные записки. – 2003. – № 3.
Ризаева А. Правовое регулирование участия трудящихся в управлении компанией в Европейском Союзе // Право и экономика. – 2006. – № 4. – С. 64–66.
