PRIORITIZING AND SUBSTANTIATING OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL REGION
Keywords:
innovation development, import substitution, priorities, the complexity of the economy, investments, network economy.Abstract
The relevance of the problem is related to the necessity of solving a contradiction between the increasing of investment into formation innovative infrastructure and the achievable results of the activity. Low level of competitive ability of the major part of Russian goods does not allow them to compete not only on the foreign markets, and within the domestic one as well. The research aims at developing approaches to choosing priorities of innovative development with regard to regional economy, and special attention is paid to the fact that for sustainable regional development it is necessary to “complicate” economy and improve its diversification. Statistical methods of study, methods of optimization, and production functions were used in this work. Results: models were developed for which priorities of innovative development were calculated for the Chelyabinsk Region. Key conclusions: for successful development of innovative activities in industrial regions it is necessary to create a regional register of industrial technologies; and when choosing priorities of innovative development, it is reasonable to proceed from the criterion on economical complexity of a region.References
Anderson T.W., and Cheng Hsiao. Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data // Journal of Econometrics. – 1982. – Vol. 18. – P. 47–82.
Black S.E. and Lynch L.M. How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity // Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001, vol. 83(3), pp. 434–445.
De la Fuente A. “Dinámica regional de la renta y la población” en Velarde Fuentes and J. Serrano Sanz, J.Ma (dirs): La España del siglo XXI, volumen III: La economía. – Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid, 2008. – P. 679–719. 4. Галкина Л.А., Шарипов А.И. Алгоритм выбора приоритетов при формировании портфеля проектов импортозамещения // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. – 2016. – Т. 6, № 12А. – С. 204–218.
Garrido R., Mancha T. and Cuadrado J.R. La Política Regional y de Cohesión en la Unión Europea: veinte años de avance y un futuro nuevo // Investigaciones Regionales. – 2007. – N 10. – P. 239–266.
De La Fuente A. Inversión en infraestructuras, crecimiento y convergencia regional // Economic Reports. – 2008, 20-08, FEDEA.
Hausmann R., Hidalgo С.A. et al. The Atlas of economic complexity // New Hampshire. – Puritan Press, 2011. – 362 p.
Hausmann R., Pritchett L. et al. Growth Accelerations. – NBER Working Paper. Cambridge, MA, 2004.
International Regional Science Review. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/ 016001769301500201 [accessed 23/04/17].
Килина И.П., Лясковская Е.А. Система показателей инновационного развития региона // Экономика, управление и инвестиции. – 2013. – № 1.
Кнобель А., Фиранчук А. Российский экспорт в ЕС: общее снижение при разнонаправленных трендах // Оперативный мониторинг экономической ситуации в России. – 2016. – № 10 (28). – http://www.ranepa.ru/images/docs/monitoring/2016_1 0-28_june.pdf (дата обращения 23.11.16)
Lichtenberg F. The Output Contributions of
Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm-Level Analysis // Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1995, vol. 3 (3–4), pp. 201–217.
Министерство экономического развития Челябинской области. – http://minprom.soft74.ru/ files/123/konzepz_innovaz
Raiting the economic complexity index. Available at: http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/rankings/ hs92/
Rodrik Dani. Why We Learn Nothing from Regressing Economic Growth on Policies. – Reproduced: Harvard University, 2005.
Федеральная служба государственной статистики. – http://regions.extech.ru/regions/ region_info2.php?id=74
http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile /hs92/ 7502# Produkt Connections
