APPROACHES OF CORPORATE MANAGEMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY IN THE REGION

Authors

  • Olga V Zubkova The Ural Social and Economic Institute (branch) of “Academy of Labor and Social Relations”, Chelyabinsk
  • Tatyana A Zhilina The Ural Social and Economic Institute (branch) of “Academy of Labor and Social Relations”, Chelyabinsk
  • Evgeniy P Maskajkin he Ural Social and Economic Institute (branch) of “Academy of Labor and Social Relations”, Chelyabinsk
  • Anastasiya S Lapo South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Keywords:

regional economy, innovations, innovative process, regional innovative system, innovative activity, innovative potential, index assessment, point assessment, ranking of regions, innovative policy.

Abstract

The article substantiates the relevance of the study of the level of innovative development of the region, shows the relationship of concepts that reflect the functioning of the innovative system of the region, such as: innovative market, innovative process, innovative potential, innovative climate, and innovative activity. The article presents an approach to assessing the innovative activity of the region based on the methods of corporate management. The method of estimation of the level of innovative activity of regions, and the results of its approbation with the use of regional statistical indicators on regions of the Ural Federal district are presented. In continuation of the study of the factors influencing the innovative activity of the region, the author presents an approach to the ranking of regions on the basis of an integral score of the dynamic values of indicators characterizing both the resources and the results of the regional innovative process. According to the results of in-depth evaluation of the factors influencing the innovative activity of the region, the formation of aggressive, moderate or conservative type of the policy of innovative development of the region is recommended.

Author Biographies

Olga V Zubkova, The Ural Social and Economic Institute (branch) of “Academy of Labor and Social Relations”, Chelyabinsk

Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Head of the Department of Economics

Tatyana A Zhilina, The Ural Social and Economic Institute (branch) of “Academy of Labor and Social Relations”, Chelyabinsk

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor at the Department of Economics

Evgeniy P Maskajkin, he Ural Social and Economic Institute (branch) of “Academy of Labor and Social Relations”, Chelyabinsk

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor at the Department of Economics

Anastasiya S Lapo, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor at the Department of Economic Theory, Regional Economics, State and Municipal Management

References

Alfaro-Calderón, G.G. Innovation capabilities and innovation systems: A forgotten effects analysis of their components / G.G. Alfaro-Calderón, А. Zaragoza, V.G. Alfaro-García, A.M. Gil-Lafuente // Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. – 2020. – Vol. 894. – P. 51–62.

Alfaro-García, V.G. A fuzzy methodology for innovation management measurement / V.G. Alfaro-García, A.M. Gil-Lafuente, G.G. Alfaro-Calderón // Kybernetes. – 2017. – Vol. 46. – Issue 1. – P. 50–66.

Asheim, B.T. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters / B.T. Asheim, L. Coenen // Research Policy. – 2005. – Vol. 34, Issue 8. – P. 1173–1190.

Asheim, B.T. Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions? / B.T. Asheim // Innovation. – 2019. – Vol. 32, Issue 1. – P. 8–25.

Cooke, P. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions / Р. Cooke, M.G. Uranga, G. Etxebarria // Research Policy. – 1997. – Vol. 26 (4–5). – Р. 475–491.

Hamidi, S. The relationship between regional compactness and regional innovation capacity (RIC): Empirical evidence from a national study / S. Hamidi, А. Zandiatashbar, А. Bonakdar. // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2019. – Vol. 142. – P. 394–402.

Lengyel, B.Regional innovation systems in Нungary: The failing synergy at the national level / В. Lengyel, L. Leydesdorff // Regional Studies. – 2011. – Vol. 45. – Issue 5. –P. 677–693.

Leydesdorff, L. Measuring the expected synergy in Spanish regional and national systems of innovation / L. Leydesdorff, I. Porto-Gomez // Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2019. – Vol. 44. – Issue 1. – P. 189–209.

Lyu, L. An evolving regional innovation network: collaboration among industry, university, and research institution in China’s first technology hub / L. Lyu, W. Wu, H. Hu, R. Huang // Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2019. – Vol. 44. – Issue 3. – P. 659–680.

Porter, M.E. The competitive advantage of nations / M.E.Porter // Harvard Business Review. – 1990. – Vol. 68. – Р. 73–93.

Zemtsov, S. An assessment of regional innovation system efficiency in Russia: the application of the DEA approach / S. Zemtsov, М. Kotsemir // Scientometrics. – 2019. – Vol. 120, Issue 2. – P. 375–404.

Баев, И.А. Сущность, структура и функции рынка инноваций / И.А. Баев, Д.А. Горшенина // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Экономика и менеджмент». – 2015. – Т. 9, № 1. – С. 54–61.

Бузаев, П.С. Инновационная среда: структура и объекты / П.С. Бузаев // Известия Оренбургского государственно аграрного университета. – 2013. – № 3(41). – С. 195–197.

Грибов, В.Д. Проблемы развития инновационной деятельности в России и пути их преодоления / В.Д. Грибов, Г.В. Камчатников // Известия МГТУ «МАМИ». – 2012. – Т. 3, № 2(14). – С. 27.

Ерохина, Е.В. Инновационная активность региона: проблемы, оценка и возможности стимулирования / Е.В. Ерохина // Общество: политика, экономика, право. – 2015. – № 2. – С. 22–28.

Заглумина, Н.А. Инновационная активность, инновационный потенциал, инновационный климат: взаимосвязи. / Н.А. Заглумина // Инновации. – 2010. – № 11(145). – С. 45–48.

Индикаторы цифровой экономики: 2019: стат. сб. / Г.И. Абдрахманова, К.О. Вишневский, Л.М. Гохберг и др.; нац. исслед. ун-т «Высшая школа экономики». – М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2019. – 248 с. 18. Концепция долгосрочного социальноэкономического развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года. Утв. распоряжением Правительства Российской Федерации от 17 ноября 2008 г. № 1662-р.

Красовский, А.С. Современное состояние инновационных процессов в России / А.С. Красовский // Транспортное дело России. – 2010. – № 9.– С. 66–68.

Матузова, И.В. К вопросу оценки инновационной активности региона / И.В. Матузова // Царскосельские чтения. – СПб.: Ленинградский государственный университет им. А.С. Пушкина, 2016. – С. 143–146.

Полтерович, В.М. Проблема формирования национальной инновационной системы / В.М. Полтерович // Экономика и математические методы. – 2009. – № 2. – С. 3–18.

Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели. 2018: стат. сб. / Росстат. – М., 2018. – 1162 с.

Савельева, М.В. Развитие конкурентных преимуществ регионов на основе сотрудничества с заинтересованными сторонами / М.В. Савельева // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. – 2012. – № 19 (250). – С. 56–60.

Стратегия инновационного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года [Электронный ресурс]. – https://www.garant.ru/ products/ipo/prime/doc/70006124/ (дата обращения 01.08.2019).

Устинова, К.А. Инновационная активность организаций и населения / К.А. Устинова // Проблемы развития территории. – 2013. – Вып. 2(64). – С. 33–42.

Хоршикян, С.В. Рынок инноваций и проблемы трансфера инноваций / С.В. Хоршикян // Век качества. – 2015. – № 2. – С. 46–47.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-23

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 4 (2019)

Section

Regional economy