METHODS OF DEVELOPMENT OF COORDINATED MANAGERIAL DECISIONS FOR SELECTION OF EFFICIENT PROJECTS. PART 2
Keywords:
project, capital investment project, managerial decisions, evaluation, correlation, analytic hierarchy process, AHP, fuzzy sets, mathematical statistics.Abstract
Results of fundamental analysis of treatises have helped educe some problems (limitation, weaknesses and contradictions) on the basis of which has been formulated the direction of further development of the financial management on the efficient project chosen. New methodology in the range of designated direction is suggested for developing coordinated management decisions for the selection of effective investment projects. There are two fundamental theses in the methodology, which have scientific originality for financial and math sciences: synthesis of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with elements of math statistics; synthesis AHP with fuzzy sets methods and math statistics methods. The first statement has disclosed in the previous article of the author. This article aims to introduce the second statement. The obtained results of fundamental analysis have allowed formulating the new methodology and modernizing classical representation AHP by T. Saaty to improving weaknesses, contradictions and limitation in part of: extension and correction the experts judgments scale by T. Saaty; new notations of matrix grade has been introduced; using neither one-type but different forms of fuzzy and empty sets in the range of paired comparisons matrix; suggesting new operations of paired comparison in AHP with fuzzy sets; new principles of formation of fuzzy sets variations transitive chains are developed; replacement or supplement of grade compatibility fuzzy exponent in paired comparisons matrix. Upgrade version AHP will help to resolve different problems of multi-criteria choice in all kinds of science with high universality and flexibility degree. The development potential of methods has been determined in the end of the article and AHP.References
Аньшин, В.М. Применение теории нечётких множеств к задаче формирования портфеля проектов / В.М. Аньшин, И.В. Демкин, И.Н. Царьков, И.М. Никонов // Проблемы анализа риска. – 2008. – Т. 5. – № 3. – С. 8–21.
Бородин, А.И. Оценивание инвестиционной привлекательности инновационных проектов на основе нечеткой логики / А.И. Бородин, Е.Д. Стрельцова, Е.В. Катков // Прикладная информатика. – 2013. – № 4 (46). – С. 19–25.
Громыко, Г.Л. Об использовании коэффициента Джини в экономико-статистических исследованиях / Г.Л. Громыко, И.Н. Матюхина // Вопросы статистики. – 2015. – № 9. – С. 56–66. DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2015-0-9-56-66
Джини, К. Средние величины / пер. с итал. П.А. Лисовского и Ю.П. Лисовского; науч. ред. и вступ. статья Г.Г. Пирогова и С.Д. Горшенина. – М.: Статистика, 1970. – 447 с.
Джини, К. Логика в статистике / пер. с итал. Л.С. Кучаева. – М.: Статистика, 1973. – 125 с.
Заде, Л.А. Понятие лингвистической переменной и его применение к принятию приближенных решений / пер. с англ. Н.И. Ринго; под ред. Н.Н. Моисеева и С.А. Орловского. – М.: Мир, 1976. – 165 с.
Заде, Л.А. Теория линейных систем. Метод пространства состояний / А. Лофт, Ч.А. Дезоер; пер. с англ. В. Н. Варыгина [и др.]; под ред. Г.С. Поспелова. – М.: Наука, 1970. – 703 с.
Зайцев, К.Д. Реализация инвестиционного проекта в рамках энергоэффективной стратегии энергетического предприятия / К.Д. Зайцев // Проблемы экономики и управления нефтегазовым комплексом. – 2015. – № 5. – С. 48–52.
Кендэл, М.Дж. Многомерный статистический анализ и временные ряды / М. Кендалл, А. Стьюарт; пер. с англ. Э.Л. Пресмана, В.И. Ротаря; под ред. А.Н. Колмогорова, Ю.В. Прохорова. – М.: Наука, 1976. – 736 с.
Кендэл, М.Дж. Статистические выводы и связи / М.Д. Кендэл, А. Стьюарт; пер. с англ. Л.И. Гальчука, А.Т. Терехина; под ред. А.Н. Колмогорова. – М.: Наука, 1973. – 899 с.
Кендэл, М.Дж. Теория распределений / М.Дж. Кендэл, А. Стьюарт; пер. с англ. В.В. Сазонова, А.Н. Ширяева; под ред. А.Н. Колмогорова. – М.: Наука, 1966. – 587 с.
Кравченко, Т.К. Аналитическое обоснование выбора объекта венчурных инвестиций / Т.К. Кравченко // Финансовая аналитика: проблемы и решения. – 2015. – № 41 (275). – С. 35–46.
Куликов, Д.Л. Многокритериальный выбор инвестиционной площадки методом анализа иерархий / Д.Л. Куликов, В.А. Лыкова // Фундаментальные исследования. – 2017. – № 7. – С. 151– 155.
Курчик, А.М. Многокритериальный выбор проектов в минерально-сырьевом комплексе с помощью метода анализа иерархий / А.М. Курчик // Известия высших учебных заведений. Геология и разведка. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 73–78.
Лихошерст, Е.Н. Выбор оптимального портфеля проектов строительной компании с учётом запросов стейкхолдеров в нечёткомножественной постановке / Е.Н. Лихошерст, Л.С. Мазелис, А.Я. Чен // Территория новых возможностей. Вестник Владивостокского государственного университета экономики и сервиса. – 2015. – № 4. – С. 27–40.
Путивцева, Н.В. Разработка программной поддержки принятия решений для выбора инвестиционных проектов / Н.В. Путивцева, С.В. Игрунова, Л.В. Мигальи др. // Научные ведомости Белгородского государственного университета. Серия «Экономика. Информатика». – 2015. – № 1 (198). – С. 111–117.
Ремезова, Е.М. Согласование критериальных оценок при выборе инвестиционных проектов / Е.М. Ремезова, В.Г. Чернов // Динамика сложных систем – XXI век. – 2016. – Т. 10. – № 4. – С. 10–21.
Чванова, М.С. Выбор проекта и оценка его эффективности на основе нечетких запросов и метода экспертных оценок / М.С. Чванова, И.А. Киселева, А.А. Молчанов // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия «Гуманитарные науки». – 2013. – № 12 (128). – С. 138–150.
Шагеев, Д.А. Концептуальное представление методики разработки согласованных управленческих решений для выбора эффективных проектов / Д.А. Шагеев // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Экономика и менеджмент». – 2019. – Т. 13, № 1. – С. 162–177. DOI: 10.14529/em190117
Шагеев, Д.А. Методика разработки согласованных управленческих решений для выбора эффективных проектов. Часть 1 / Д.А. Шагеев // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Экономика и менеджмент». – 2019. – Т. 13, № 2. – С. 145–164. DOI: 10.14529/em190218
Anyaeche, C.O. A Fuzzy-Analytical Hierarchy Model for Solid Waste / C.O. Anyaeche, S.A. Adekola // Mathematical Theory and Modeling. – 2014. – V. 4, № 1. – Р. 32–47.
Bellman, R.E. Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment / R.E. Bellman, L.A. Zadeh // Management Science. – 1970. – V. 7, iss. 4. – P. 141–164. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
Božanić, D. Modification of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method using fuzzy logic: fuzzy AHP approach as a support to the decision making process concerning engagement of the group for additional hindering / D. Božanić, D. Pamučar, D. Bojanić // Serbian Journal of Management. – 2015. – V. 10, № 2. – Р. 151–171. DOI: 10.5937/sjm107223.
Çebi, A. An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for evaluating students' project / A. Çebi, H. Karal // Educational Research and Reviews. – 2017. – V. 12, iss. 3. – P. 120–132. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2016.3065.
Cheng, C.-H. A Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations Based ANP Model for R&D Project Selection / C.-H. Cheng, J.J.H. Liou, Ch.-Y. Chiu // Sustainability. – 2017. – V. 9, iss. 8. – P. 1352. DOI: 10.3390/su9081352.
Cox, E. The fuzzy systems handbook: A practitioner's guide to building, using, a. maintaining fuzzy systems / E. Cox; [Forew. by L.A. Zadeh]. – 2. ed. – San Diego etc.: AP professional, Cop. 1999. – XLVIII, 716 p.
Djolov, G. A Note on the Estimation of the Gini Index / G. Djolov // The Journal of Applied Economic Research. – 2014. – V. 8, iss. 3. – P. 237–256.
Durmuşoğlu, Z.D.U. Assessment of technoentrepreneurship projects by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) / Z.D.U. Durmuşoğlu // Technology in Society. – 2018. – V. 54. – P. 41–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.02.001
Enea, M. Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP / M. Enea // Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making. – 2004. – №3. – Р. 39–62. DOI: 10.1023/B:FODM.0000013071.63614.3d
Fazlollahtabar, H. Designing a Fuzzy Expert System to Evaluate Alternatives in Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process / H. Fazlollahtabar, H. Eslami, H. Salmani // Journal Software Engineering & Applications. – 2010. – №3. – Р. 409–418. DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2010.34046.
Gaines, B.R. Fuzzy sets and decision analysis - a perspective / B.R. Gaines, H.J. Zimmerman, L.A. Zadeh // Fuzzy sets and decision analysis, volume 20 of Studies in the Management Sciences. – Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. – 1984. – P. 3-8.
Garbuzova-Schlifter, M. AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia / M. Garbuzova-Schlifter, R. Madlener // Energy Policy. – 2016. – V. 97. – P. 559–581. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.024
Jafarzadeh, H. A methodology for project portfolio selection under criteria prioritisation, uncertainty and projects interdependency – combination of fuzzy QFD and DEA / H. Jafarzadeh, P. Akbari, B. Abedin // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2018. – V. 110. – P. 237–249. DOI: 10.1016/ j.eswa.2018.05.028
Jing, L. A hybrid fuzzy stochastic analytical hierarchy process (FSAHP) approach for evaluating ballast water treatment technologies / L. Jing, B. Chen, B. Zhang, H. Peng // Environmental Systems Research. – 2013. – P. 2–10. DOI: 10.1186/21932697-2-10. 35. Khalili-Damghani, K. A decision support system for fuzzy multi-objective multi-period sustainable project selection / K. Khalili-Damghani, S. SadiNezhad // Computers & Industrial Engineering. – 2013. – V. 64, iss. 4. – P. 1045–1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2013.01.016 36. Khalilzadeh, M. A multi-objective fuzzy project selection problem considering social responsibility and risk / M. Khalilzadeh, K. Salehi // Procedia Computer Science. – 2017. – V. 121. – P. 646–655. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.085
Langel, M. Variance estimation of the Gini index: revisiting a result several times published / M. Langel, Y. Tille // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. – 2013. – V. 176, № 2. – P. 521–540. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01048.x
Li T. Refractured Well Selection for Multicriteria Group Decision Making by Integrating Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS Based on IntervalTyped Fuzzy Numbers / T. Li, J. Jin, Ch. Li // Journal of Applied Mathematics. – 2012. – V. 2012, Article ID 304287. – P. 21. DOI: 10.1155/2012/304287.
Mandal, S. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for selection of open cast coal mine project / S. Mandal // International Journal of Industrial Engineering Research and Development. – 2016. – V. 7, iss. 2. – P. 1–13, Article ID: IJIERD_07_02_001
Mahendran, P. A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Selection of Measuring Instrument for Engineering College Selection / P. Mahendran, M.B.K. Moorthy, S. Saravanan // Applied Mathematical Sciences. – 2014. – V. 8, №44. – Р. 2149–2161. DOI: 10.12988/ams.2014.44232
Mahmoodzadeh, S. Project Selection by Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Technique / S. Mahmoodzadeh, J. Shahrabi, M. Pariazar, M.S. Zaeri // Digital Open Science Index. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering. – 2007. – V.1, № 6. – Р. 270–275.
Moeini, H. Vendor Selection via Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study / H. Moeini // Int. Journal of Social Science and Management. – 2014. – V. 1, iss. 1. – P. 61–69.
Nassif, L.N. Project Portfolio Selection in Public Administration Using Fuzzy Logic / L.N. Nassif, J.C.S. Filho, J.M. Nogueira // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. – 2013. – V. 74. – P. 41–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.036
Péreza, F. Project portfolio selection and planning with fuzzy constraints / F. Péreza, T. Gómez, R. Caballero, V. Liern // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2018. – V. 131. – P. 117–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.012
Peetawan, W. Identifying factors affecting the success of rail infrastructure development projects contributing to a logistics platform: A Thailand case study / W. Peetawan, K. Suthiwartnarueput // Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. – 2018. – V. 39, iss. 2. – P. 320–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjss.2018.05.002
Salehi, K. A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for project selection problem / K. Salehi // Decision Science Letters. – 2015. – № 4. – Р. 109–116. DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2014.8.003.
Salehi, M. Application of Fuzzy TOPSIS Technique for Evaluation of Project / M. Salehi // World Applied Sciences Journal. – 2009. – V. 6, № 6. – P. 776–783.
Sevkli, M. Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industryin Turkey / M. Sevkli, A. Oztekin, O. Uysal, G. Torlak, A. Turkyilmaz, D. Delen // Expert Systems with Applications. – 2012. – V. 39, iss. 1. – P. 14–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.047
Süße, M. Decision Support for Planning Techniques in Energy Efficiency Projects / M. Süße, J. Stoldt, A. Schlegel, M. Putz // Procedia CIRP. – 2018. – V. 69. – P. 306–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.015
Tang, Y-C. Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to the lead-free equipment selection decision / Y-C. Tang, T.W. Lin // Int. Journal Business and Systems Research. – 2011. – V. 5, № 1. – P. 35– 56. DOI: 10.1504/ijbsr.2011.037289
Tavana, M. A fuzzy hybrid project portfolio selection method using Data Envelopment Analysis, TOPSIS and Integer Programming / M. Tavana, M. Keramatpour, F.J. Santos-Arteaga, E. Ghorbaniane // Expert Systems With Applications. – 2015. – № 42. – Р. 8432–8444. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.057.
Vahidnia, M.H. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in GIS application / M.H. Vahidnia, A. Alesheikh, A. Alimohammadi, A. Bassiri // The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. – 2008. – V. XXXVII, Part B2. – P. 593–596.
Wu, Y. An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria framework for large-scale rooftop PV project portfolio selection: Case study in Zhejiang, China / Y. Wu, Ch. Xu, Y. Ke, K. Chen, X. Sun // Energy. – 2018. – V. 143. – P. 295–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy. 2017.10.105
Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets / L.A. Zadeh // Information and Control. –1965. – V. 8, iss. 3. – P. 338– 353. DOI: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zadeh, L.A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning – I / L.A. Zadeh // Information Sciences. – 1975. – V.8, iss. 3, P. 199–249. DOI: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
Zadeh, L.A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning – II / L.A. Zadeh // Information Sciences. – 1975. – V. 8, iss. 4. – P. 301–357. DOI: 10.1016/00200255(75)90046-8
Zadeh, L.A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning – III / L.A. Zadeh // Information Sciences. – 1975. – V. 9, iss. 1. – P. 43–80. DOI: 10.1016/00200255(75)90017-1
Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets and their applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes / L.A. Zadeh, K.S. Fu, K. Tanaka, M. Shimura. – New York: Academic Press, 1975. – 496 p.
Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy Probabilities and Their Role in Decision Analysis / L.A. Zadeh // IFAC Proceedings Volumes. – 1975. – V. 15, iss. 1. – P. 15–21. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)63319-6
Zadeh, L.A. The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems / L.A. Zadeh // Fuzzy Sets and Systems. – 1983. – V. 11, iss. 1–3. – P. 199–227. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80081-5
Zadeh, L.A. Approximate reasoning in intelligent systems, decision and control / L.A. Zadeh, E. Sanchez. – Oxford etc.: Pergamon press. – 1987. – 195 p.
Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty / L.A. Zadeh, J. Kacprzyk. – New-York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. – 1992. – 676 p.
Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility / L.A. Zadeh // Fuzzy Sets and Systems. – 1999. – V. 100. – P. 9–34. DOI: 10.1016/S01650114(99)80004-9
Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy theory systems: Techniques and applications / Ed. by С.T. Leondes; [Forew. by L.A. Zadeh]. – San Diego etc.: Acad. press, Cop. – 1999. – 1746 p.
