PROJECT OUTSOURCING AS A FORM OF RESEARCH AND PRODUCTION COOPERATION OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES
Keywords:
research and production cooperation, research and development products, project outsourcing, transaction costs.Abstract
The article provides a comparative analysis of the methods for developing the research and development products by industrial enterprises. The most common way is identified, and this is project research and production cooperation. We consider the problems of establishing project research and production cooperation in the case of using one-time agreements for the development of research products, what is related to unjustified fragmentation of work, the appearance of temporary gaps between individual stages, and the increase in the cost of individual stages as compared to the planned values. We propose using a new form of relationship – project outsourcing, based on strategic partnerships between the outsourcer and the customer, with the transfer of project risks and additional profits to the outsourcer. We introduce a concept of the "costs of entering the project", which is a component of transaction costs, consisting of the expenditures for searching, checking and execution of contractual relations with the contractor, as well as the costs of duplication and adjustment of work in case of long breaks between stages. The average values of the costs of entering the project in temporal terms are determined based on the processing of the expert assessments by project managers. The hypothesis that the main article of over expenditures of the planned costs is the remuneration for the performers has been tested and verified. This proves the relevance of cost accounting for entry into the project. We propose to calculate the cost of work under a project outsourcing agreement as the sum of direct costs and the additional bonus of reducing the transaction costs. Based on the analysis of 12 projects on the elaboration of research and development products the criteria have been formed on selecting the projects to be transferred to project outsourcing, depending on their duration, complexity (cost) and the number of work stages.References
Сербиновский Б.Б., Сербиновский Б.Ю. Функции, виды и организационные формы научноисследовательского аутсорсинга // Известия ИГЭА. – 2008. – № 2 (58). – С. 93–97.
Rolsdеs A., Henriksen B., O'Sullivan D. Manufacturing Outsourcing: A Knowledge Perspective. – London, 2012. – 232 p.
Белкина Т.Ю. Проблемы внедрения аутсорсинга на промышленных предприятиях РФ // Проблемы современной экономики. – 2011. – № 3(39). – С. 64–82.
Дёмчева Е.А. Научно-технический аутсорсинг как инструмент управления развитием химических предприятий: автореф. дис. … канд. экон. наук. – М.: МГАТХТ им. М.В. Ломоносова, 2008.
Сербиновский Б.Б. Научно-исследовательский аутсорсинг в организации подготовки производства: проблемы и пути развития // Известия ИГЭА. 2008. – № 4. – С. 54–71.
Rundquist J., Halila F. Outsourcing of NPD activities: A best practice approach // European Journal of Innovation Management. – 2010. – № 13(1). – Р. 5–23.
McMahon R.G.P. Ownership structure, business growth and financial performance amongst SMEs: From Australia's business longitudinal survey // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. – 2007. – Т. 14, № 3. – Р. 458–477.
Han S.Y., Bae S.J. Internalization of R&D outsourcing: An empirical study.// International Journal of Production Economics. – 2014. – № 150. – Р. 58–73.
Bianchi M., Croce A., Dell'Era C., Di Benedetto C.A., Frattini F. Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance // Journal of Product Innovation Management. – 2016. – № 33(4). – Р. 492–510.
Отставнов С., Крылов Ю. Аутсорсинг НИОКР: возможности и преимуществ // Ремедиум. – 2014. – № 1/2. – С. 47–53.
MC Becker, F Zirpoli. Organizing new product development // International Journal of Operations & Production . – 2003. – Vol. 23, № 9. – Р. 1033–1061.
Broedner P., Kinkel S., Lay G.. Productivity effects of outsourcing: New evidence on the strategic importance of vertical integration decisions // International Journal of Operations and Production Management. – 2009. – № 29(2). – Р. 127–150.
Pereira C., Sousa C., Soares A.L. Supporting conceptualisation processes in collaborative networks: A case study on an R&D project // International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. – 2013. – № 26(11). – Р. 1066–1086.
Северов А.С. Неявные проблемы аутсорсинга // Аудит и финансовый анализ. 2007. – № 5. – С. 18–24.
Wallis J.J. and North D.C. Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870– 1970 // Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986. – Р. 95–161.
Шакиров Н.Ш. Теория и методология оценки трансакционных издержек // Актуальные
проблемы экономики и права.– 2010. – № 1. – С. 19–30.
Иосков М.О. Оценка транcакционных издержек в корпоративных структурах // Вектор науки ТГУ. – 2017. – № 2 (16). – С. 246–251.
Литвинцева Г.П., Гахова Н.А Динамика трансакционного сектора экономки России: как учил Д. Норт // Журнал институциональных исследований. – 2016. – Т. 8, № 2. – С. 38–50.
Шинкевич А.И., Шинкевич М.В., Зарайченко И.А.. Технологические «окна возможностей»: управление трансакционными издержками инновационного развития // Вестник Казанского технологического университета. – 2010. – № 3. – С. 207–214.
Долгов Д.И. Рациональная организация стадий жизненного цикла наукоемкой промышленной продукции как фактор обеспечения конкурентоспособности предприятия // Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования кооперативного сектора экономики. – 2008. – № 2. – С. 52–59.
Войт А.В. Особенности управления наукоемкой продукцией по стадиям жизненного цикла // Европейский союз ученых (ЕСУ). Экономические ИСО 9004-1-94 Управление качеством и элементы системы качества. Часть 1. Руководящие указания науки. – 2015. – № 7 (16).– С. 37–40.
Мартынов О.Ю. Жизненный цикл технологий в производстве наукоемкой продукции // Вектор науки ТГУ. – 2012. – № 1 (19). – С. 69–72.
