Simulation of an industrial tractor with an electric transmission in a bulldozing technological cycle

Authors

  • Sergey V. Kondakov South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6818-1694
  • Georgy V. Lomakin South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia
  • Olga O. Pavlovskaya South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
  • Artyom E. Gorely South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
  • Maxim V. Dmitryuk DST-URAL plant, Chelyabinsk
  • Konstantin V. Gavrilov South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk
  • Ekaterina A. Gartlib DST-URAL plant, Chelyabinsk
  • Yuri V. Rozhdestvensky South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/engin260309

Keywords:

bulldozer cycle, internal combustion engine, electromechanical transmission, generator, traction electric motor, energy storage device, average output power of the motor-transmission unit

Abstract

The emergence of affordable, relatively compact permanent magnet electric machines for heavy construction equipment opens up new prospects for the implementation of electric drives in industrial tractor transmissions. These are also continuously variable, externally adjustable transmissions, like hydrostatic ones. They are easily automated and allow the design of unmanned vehicles and technological equipment. The obvious advantage of electric transmissions over hydrostatic ones is their efficiency. Literary sources claim that the efficiency of permanent magnet electric machines is almost 100%. In contrast, hydrostatic machines have an average efficiency of approximately 80 %. Permanent magnet electric machines do not have the ability to recuperate power. There is no additional device in the form of an energy storage unit (ESU). For electrical energy, such capabilities are well known and widely used. An ESU, unlike the generally accepted understanding of a ESU, combines the properties of a capacitor, capable of rapid charging and discharging, and a battery, capable of storing energy for an extended period. The purpose of this study is to mathematically describe the combined operation of an internal combustion engine, generator, traction electric motors, and battery (as we will traditionally refer to the energy storage device) during bulldozer operations. The bulldozer loads the motor-transmission unit of an industrial tractor with rapidly changing (up to 10-fold) loads over a short period (100 seconds). Of interest is the magnitude of currents and voltages in the EMT during operation of a 21-ton D12E industrial tractor manufactured by the DST-Ural plant. Currents are approximately 200 A, and voltages are 500 V. The modeling results are also important for the newly designed DST-Ural D30 and D40 super-heavy bulldozers.

References

1. Yu Q., Zhang H., Li Y., Wang J. A review on the powertrains and energy management strategies for electric tractors // The Innovation: Energy. 2024. Vol. 1. Article 100064. URL: https://www.theinnovation.org/article/doi/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100064 (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

2. Banday R. U. Z. et al. Current status, performance characteristics and future perspectives of electric tractors // Agricultural and Biological Engineering Research. 2024. Vol. 6, no. 4. P. 45–60. URL: https://aber.apacsci.com/index.php/ama/article/view/3078 (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

3. Basma H. et al. Battery electric tractor-trailers in the European Union. ICCT Working Paper 2021-XX. 2021. 64 p. URL: https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/eu-tractor-trailersanalysis-aug21.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

4. Götz K. et al. Unlocking the potential of electric and hybrid tractors via sensitivity and technoeconomic analysis // Applied Energy. 2025. Vol. 380. Article 123456. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924019287 (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

5. Zhang Y. et al. Design of tractor hybrid electric powertrain and energy management strategy for improved fuel economy // Energy Reports. 2025. Vol. 11. P. 200–215. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001986 (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

6. John Deere. Sustainability Report 2020. 2020. 120 p. URL: https://www.deere.com/assets/pdfs/common/our-company/sustainability/sustainability-report-2020.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

7. John Deere. Interest in electric tractors: Customers react to John Deere’s new electric tractor prototype. 29.04.2025. URL: https://www.deere.com/en/stories/featured/electric-tractor/ (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

8. Исаков П.П., Иванченко П.Н., Егоров А.Д. Электромеханические трансмиссии гусеничных тракторов. М.: Машиностроение, 1981. 302с.

9. Гинзбург Ю.В., Швед А.И., Парфенов А.П. Промышленные тракторы. М.: Машиностроение, 1986. 293 с.

10. Advances in battery technology, powertrain design, and control strategies for electric tractors // International Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology. 2025. Vol. 7, issue 10, part D. P. 210–218. URL: https://www.agriculturaljournals.com/archives/2025/vol7issue10/PartD/7-10-36-350.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

11. Chen K., Luo J., Huang Y. Impact of low temperature exposure on lithium-ion batteries: A multi-scale study of performance degradation, predictive signals and underlying mechanisms // Chemical Engineering Journal. 2025. Vol. 503. Article 158260.

12. Самосейко В.Ф. Теоретические основы управления электроприводом: учебное пособие. СПб.: Элмор, 2007. 464 с.

13. Воронин С.Г., Курносов Д.А. Регулирование механических координат вентильного электропривода методом векторного управления // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Энергетика». 2015. Вып. 15, № 3. С. 52–58. DOI: 10.14529/power150307

14. Глинкин С.А., Захаров А.В. Опыт конструирования и освоения производства опытно-промышленной партии вентильно-индукторных двигателей // Вестник ИГЭУ. 2015. Вып. 1. С. 1–7.

15. Овсянников Е.М., Клюкин П.Н. Стартер-генераторные устройства для двигателей внутреннего сгорания автомобилей // Материалы международной научно-технической конференции ААИ «Автомобиле- и тракторостроение в России: приоритеты развития и подготовка кадров», посвященной 145-летию МГТУ «МАМИ». 2015. С. 135–138.

16. Стадухин А.А., Сарач Е.Б. Перспективы применения тягового электропривода на гусеничных машинах // Инженерный журнал: наука и инновации. 2013. Вып. 10. URL: http://engjournal.ru/catalog/machin/transport/977.html (дата обращения: 12.01.2026).

17. Voronin S.G., Sogrin A.I., Shaburov P.O., Kuleva N.I. Comparative evaluation of actuating motors for traction electric drive of transport robots // Proceedings of the 2018 Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC). 2018. Article no. 8570149. DOI: 10.1109/GloSIC.2018.8570149.

18. Холодов А.М. Основы динамики землеройно-транспортных машин. М.: Машиностроение, 1968. 156 с.

19. Кондаков С.В., Довжик В.Л., Злотник М.И. Влияние динамики нагружения на выбор параметров моторно-трансмиссионной установки промышленного трактора // Тракторы и сельхозмашины. 1988. № 1. С. 17–20.

20. Кондаков С.В., Ломакин Г.В., Павловская О.О. и др. Повышение эффективности промышленного трактора-бульдозера совершенствованием алгоритма управления моторно-трансмиссионной установкой. Результаты математического моделирования и полевых испытаний // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Машиностроение». 2024. Т. 24, № 1. С. 49–59. DOI: 10.14529/engin240105.

Published

2026-09-26

Issue

Section

Численные методы моделирования