The implementation of priority national projects in the mirror of public opinion of the Ural federal district

Authors

  • Sergei Vjаcheslavovich Odyakov South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
  • Natal'jа Leonidovna Naumova South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
  • Aleksandr Anatol'evich Lukin South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/ssh170111

Keywords:

socio-cultural portrait of the region, socio-economic development of the region, economic, social and cultural status of the region, social sphere, priority national projects, cultural capital, Ural Federal District

Abstract

The article discusses the public opinion of the Ural Federal District (UFD) on the implementation
of priority national projects basing on materials of representative surveys. The most disadvantaged
regions in terms of the state of social sphere and region’s economy sectors have been revealed. Despite
some problems of social and economic development most UFD regions show “positive dynamics” in
public satisfaction with the state of affairs in the region of residence. The most acute problem for the
UFD regions is cultural capital growth, as the modern economy requires not only having a specific
qualification, but also mastering the rules of modern urban culture, in order to combine indicators of
culture and professional qualification, thus forming an indicator of human capital assets.

Author Biographies

Sergei Vjаcheslavovich Odyakov, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Natal'jа Leonidovna Naumova, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Aleksandr Anatol'evich Lukin, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

References

Аузан, А. А. Общественный договор и гражданское

общество / А. А. Аузан // Мир России: социология, этно-

логия. — 2005. — № 3. — С. 3—18.

Глобализация и социальные институты: социологи-

ческий подход / отв. ред. И. Ф. Девятко, В. Н. Фомина. —

М. : Наука, 2010. — 335 с.

Ионов, А. А. Методические требования к вы-

борке и организации эмпирического исследования в

регионе / А. А. Ионов // Программа и типовой инстру-

ментарий Социокультурный портрет региона России

(Модификация-2010) ; Институт философии РАН. — М.,

— С. 88—102.

Нархов, Д. Ю. Преподаватели высшей школы как

ресурс модернизации высшего профессионального образо-

вания : дис. … канд. социол. наук. 22.00.04. — Екатерибург,

— 246 c.

Научный потенциал вузов и научных организаций

Министерства образования и науки Российской Феде-

рации: 2013 : информ.-аналит. сб. / Е. И. Белоклоков, Ю.

В Воронов., Е. А. Законников и др. — СПб. : СПбГЭТУ

«ЛЭТИ», 2014. — 210 с.

Issue

Section

Political Science