EVOLUTION OF SECRET VOTING IN THE DIGITAL STATE

Authors

  • Kirill S. Evsikov Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), г. Москва, Россия

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law230111

Keywords:

secret voting, confidential information, «digital neo-Luddism», digital democracy, digital transformation of the electoral system, digital state.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the evolution of the institution of secret voting. In the context of the formation of the information society and the development of digital technologies, traditional legal guarantees that ensure its protection have lost their effectiveness. At the
same time, well-established mechanisms for ensuring compliance with the principle of secret voting
act as a barrier to the digital transformation of the electoral process. The article reveals the relationship of this legal institution with information law. On the basis of the study, it is proposed to form
an information-legal institution "voting secrecy" in the structure of confidential information. The
advantages of such an evolution include increasing the possibilities of using digital technologies in
the electoral process, increasing the number of institutions of direct democracy, improving the institution of legal responsibility for disclosing the results of voting by a particular voter, as well as regulating the circulation of this type of information.  It seems that in order to implement this proposal, the legislator needs to determine the purpose
of the special legal regime, the object of legal regulation, the legal status of subjects of legal relations, the complex of legal means for regulating the circulation of information constituting the secrecy of voting, and the means of legal influence on persons infringing the established order. The
article formulates specific proposals on the content of these elements of the new information and
legal institution.

Author Biography

Kirill S. Evsikov, Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), г. Москва, Россия

Кандидат юридических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры информационного права и цифровых технологий, Московский государственный юридический университет имени О. Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), г. Москва.

References

1. Козлова Е. И., Кутафин О. Е. Конституционное право Российской Федерации: учебник. М.: Юрист, 1996. 480 с.

2. Минбалеев А. В. Проблемные вопросы понятия и сущности персональных данных // Вестник УрФО. Безопасность в информационной сфере. 2012. № 2 (4). С. 4–9.

3. Пашнина Т. В., Минбалеев А. В. Развитие права на информацию в свете стратегических документов Российской Федерации // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. 2018. № 3. С. 88–92.

4. Полякова Т. А., Минбалеев А. В., Кроткова Н. В. Развитие науки информационного права и правового обеспечения информационной безопасности: формирование научной школы информационного права (прошлое и будущее) // Государство и право. 2021. № 12. С. 97–108.

5. Руссо Ж.-Ж. Об общественном договоре. Трактаты. М.: КАНОН-Пресс, 1998. 414 с.

6. Can I take a selfie with my ballot? URL: https://www.markhamvotes.ca/en/faqs/faqs.aspx Report.

7. Foa R. S., Klassen A., Slade M., Rand A, Collins R. 2020. The Global Satisfaction with Democracy Report 2020 // Cambridge, United Kingdom: Centre for the Future of Democracy. 60 р.

8. HOUSE BILL 366-FN an act relative to showing a ballot. URL: http://www. gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2014/HB0366.html.

9. LeitsätzezumUrteil des Zweiten Senats vom 3. März 2009 – 2 BvC 3/07, 2 BvC 4/07. URL:

https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2009/03/cs20090303_2bvc000307.html.

10. Point 3.9 and 3.10 in Second interim report on the inquiry into the conduct of the 2013 federal election: An assessment of electronic voting options. URL: https://www.aph. gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Electoral_Matters/20 13_General_Election/Second_Interim_Report.

11. SB 128 (2019). URL: http://arc-sos.state.al.us/ucp/B19156AA.BI5.pdf.

12. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Case No. 14-cv-489-PB Opinion No. 2015 DNH 154 P. URL: https://www.nhd.uscourts. gov/sites/default/files/Opinions/15/15NH154P.pdf#search=voting%20booths. Report.

13. Wike, R. Simmons, K., Stokes B., Fetterolf J. Globally, Broad Support for Representative and Direct Democracy. URL: http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/10/16/globally-broad-support-forrepresentative-and-direct-democracy.

Published

2023-03-15 — Updated on 2026-07-16

Versions

Issue

Section

Публично-правовые (государственно-правовые) науки