APPLICATION OF ALGORITHMS IN JURISPRUDENCE

Authors

  • Alexey V. Komin Московский государственный юридический университет имени О. Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), г. Москва

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law230211

Keywords:

legal algorithm, flowchart, low-code, decision tree, full-text search, machinereadable law.

Abstract

The article explores the problems of applying algorithms by lawyers in legal activities
and beyond. The author considers the meaning of the concept of "algorithm" and ways of describing
algorithms by lawyers. The paper notes the positive effect of the algorithmization of legal work in the
so-called paper form, even without the use of automation tools for such work.
In addition, the obstacles that stand in the way of the algorithmization of legal processes by the
efforts of the lawyers themselves are explored. The author's statements are illustrated by examples of
practical situations in which the use of legal algorithms can increase the efficiency of a lawyer.
Among the examples given is the algorithm for qualifying a transaction made by a company as a
major one. The study also examined the established practice of compiling due diligence reports of
companies, and within it identified processes that are already algorithmic in nature.
In addition, the author highlights the role of machine-readable law in the automation of legal activities, and also points out the obstacles still standing in the way of such automation. The author analyzes the possible role of algorithms in the verification of judicial acts and the potential advantages of
such an approach.

At the end of the article, a conclusion is made about the importance of acquiring the necessary skills for lawyers to algorithmize their tasks, as well as the role of universities in this process.

Author Biography

Alexey V. Komin, Московский государственный юридический университет имени О. Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), г. Москва

Alexey V. Komin, Post-Graduate Student of Information Law and digital technologies department,
Moscow State Law University named after O. E. Kutafin (MSLA), Moscow, Russia.

References

1. Джонс К. Практические инновации: no- или low-code подходы к управлению судебной практикой и улучшение процессов. URL: https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/legal/practice-innovations-july22-no-code-low-code-legal-apps.

2. Гапоненко А. Л. Управление знаниями. М.: ИПК Госслужбы, 2001. 52 с.

3. Кирюшкин М. В. Алгоритмически ориентированное правоведение // Российский юридический журнал. 2007. № 3 (55). С. 17 27.

4. Кирюшкин М. В. Алгоритмические преобразования в юриспруденции // Российский юридический журнал. 2007. № 4 (56). С. 34–44.

5. Кнут Д. Искусство программирования. Основные алгоритмы. М.: Вильямс, 2002. Т. 1. 720 с.

6. Кормен Т., Лейзерсон Ч., Ривест Р., Штайн К. Алгоритмы: построение и анализ. М.:

МЦНМО, 2002. 906 c.

7. Информационно-технологическое обеспечение юридической деятельности (LegalTech):

учебник / под ред. А. В. Минбалеева. М.: Проспект, 2022. 368 с.

8. Минбалеев А. В. Понятие и признаки LegalTech // Юридический мир. 2022. № 5. С. 36–40.

9. Минбалеев А. В. Основные проблемы и перспективы развития LegalTech в России в условиях цифровизации // Юрист. 2022. № 9. С. 43–48.

10. Полякова Т. А., Минбалеев А. В., Кроткова Н. В. Основные тенденции и проблемы развития науки информационного права // Государство и право. 2022. № 9. С. 94–104.

Published

2023-06-19 — Updated on 2026-07-16

Versions

Issue

Section

Публично-правовые (государственно-правовые) науки