NEURAL NETWORKS: APPLICATION, ETHICS AND LAW ISSUES

Authors

  • Irina A. Filipova Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law230411

Keywords:

machine learning, deep learning, algorithm, neural network, artificial intelligence, mathematical model, neurotechnology, digital technologies, personal data, predictive analytics, law, regulation, transparency, ethics, artificial intelligence safety.

Abstract

The use of artificial neural networks in practice has grown rapidly in recent years; they
are increasingly used in business, medicine, and even government administration. This proliferation
of neural networks as a decision-making tool changes the content of a number of social relations,
thereby posing new tasks for lawyers regarding the creation of legal regulation adequate to the
changes taking place. Based on the analysis of theoretical provisions and practical features related to
the training of artificial neural networks for the purpose of their further use as a tool for finding optimal solutions, the article draws conclusions about key issues of an ethical and legal nature, without
the resolution of which the negative effects of the use of neural networks will manifest themselves
significantly stronger.

One of these issues is the need for “fairness” in training an artificial neural network so that it
does not reproduce social prejudices and preferences of developers, discriminating against certain
social groups. Another question concerns the transparency of decision-making by a neural network;
the lack of understanding of the logic in choosing a solution does not contribute to establishing trust
on the part of people. No less important is the question of maintaining data confidentiality: how to
protect personal data if the neural network needs it to make a decision? The results of the study allow
us to more clearly formulate issues that require the priority attention of legal scholars in order to
search for solutions to them by the legal community. After all, the use of neural networks by practicing lawyers in their professional activities within the LegalTech direction, in parallel with the study
of theoretical aspects, allows them to get closer to the optimal solution to the issues raised.

Author Biography

Irina A. Filipova, Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Irina A. Filipova, Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Labor
and Environmental Law, Faculty of Law, Nizhny Novgorod State University named after
N. I. Lobachevsky, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia.

References

1. Дремлюга Р. И. Право и этика искусственного интеллекта: учебное пособие. Владивосток: Изд-во ДВФУ, 2021. 94 с.

2. Филипова И. А. Нейротехнологии в праве и правоприменении: прошлое, настоящее и

будущее // Правоприменение. 2022. Т. 6. № 2. С. 32–49.

3. Aikenhead M. The Uses and Abuses of Neural Networks in Law // Santa Clara High Technology

Law Journal, 1996. Vol. 12. Iss. 1. pp. 31–70.

4. Conway M.E. How do Committees Invent? // Datamation, 1968. Vol. 14. Iss. 5, pp. 28–31.

5. Decision No. 2018-765 DC of 12 June 2018. Law related to the protection of personal data.

URL: https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/decision/2018/ 2018765DC.htm.

6. Hunter D. Out of Their Minds: Legal Theory in Neural Networks // Artificial Intelligence and

Law, 1999. Vol. 7, pp. 129–151.

7. McCulloch W.S., Pitts W. A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity // Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1943. Vol. 5. pp. 115–133.

8. Proposal for a Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts COM/2021/206 final, 21.04.2021. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid= 1623335154975&uri =CELEX%3A52021PC0206.

9. Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on the Ethical Issues of

Neurotechnology, SHS/BIO/IBC-28/2021/3, December 15, 2021. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/

ark:/48223/pf0000378724 (дата обращения: 07.06.2023)

10. Rodrigues R. Legal and Human Rights Issues of AI: Gaps, Challenges and Vulnerabilities //

Journal of Responsible Technology, 2020. Vol. 4. Art. 100005.

11. Villata S., Araszkiewicz M., Ashley K. et al. Thirty Years of Artificial Intelligence and Law:

The Third Decade // Artificial Intelligence Law, 2022. Vol. 30, pp. 561–591.

12. Warner D.R. The Role of Neutral Networks in the Law Machine Development // Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, 1990. Vol. 16, pp. 129–144.

13. Wiener N. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New

York: The Technology Press; Paris: Hermann et Сie, 1948. 194 p.

14. Yang Zh., Li L., Lin K., Wang J., Lin Ch.-Ch., Liu Z., Wang L. The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision) // Computer Science. Submitted on 29 Sep 2023. URL:

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.17421 (дата обращения: 02.10.2023).

Published

2023-12-13 — Updated on 2026-07-17

Versions