SIMULATED IMAGES OF A PORNOGRAPHIC NATURE AS THE SUBJECT OF CRIMES RELATED TO THE CIRCULATION OF PORNOGRAPHY: COMPARATIVE RESEARCH

Authors

  • Anna I. Litovchenko Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law240205

Keywords:

simulated image, pornography, obscenity, subject of crime, foreign criminal law, deepfake

Abstract

The article examines various approaches to defining simulated images of a person as the
subject of crimes related to the circulation of pornography in foreign countries. Because the Internet provides a wide range of opportunities to access simulated pornographic materials, it is important to understand the context of their use. Simulated pornography is sexually explicit content depicting fictitious anthropomorphic characters in drawing, computer graphics and neural
network generation formats (for example, in the form of a deepfake image). Generated pornography is produced by digitally manipulating images of real people to create pornographic
material using a morphing technique, while hand-drawn pornography uses completely fictitious and often unrealistic characters (such as in manga). Of particular interest is the attribute
of realism in simulated pornographic material, which in some jurisdictions is considered key to
criminalization, since only images that resemble the truth and are misleading as to their origin
are considered the subject of crime. The purpose of the work is to determine approaches to the
phenomenon of artificially created pornography as the subject of crime. It has been established
that the legal regulation of simulated pornography varies depending on the country and the nature of the material used. The criterion for differentiation in this study is the attitude to “realistic” pornography, that is, the most accurate depiction of a person performing extremely immoral actions from the point of view of the criminal legislation of foreign countries, including
various legal systems. It has been established that the number of countries where any simulated pornography is recognized as the subject of crime includes the Republic of Indonesia, the
People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Korea, meanwhile in the
USA, the Commonwealth of Australia, and the Kingdom of Spain only recreated and drawn
child pornography. The exceptions are those states in which the circulation of the materials or
objects under research is not considered criminal, for example in Japan and the Republic of
Colombia. It is concluded that the status of simulated pornographic content in the studied legal
sources of different countries varies depending on the historical and cultural characteristics of
the region

Author Biography

Anna I. Litovchenko, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia

graduate student of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.

References

1. Додонов В. Н., Капинус О. С., Щерба С. П. Сравнительное уголовное право. Особенная

часть: монография. М., 2010. 544 с.

2. Ланьлинский насмешник. Цветы сливы в золотой вазе / пер. с кит. В. Манухина. М., 1993.

766 с.

3. Cather, K. The Art of Censorship in Postwar Japan / K. Cather. Weatherhead East Asian Institute

at Columbia University, 2012. 348 р.

4. Dines G., Sanchez M. Hentai and the Pornification of Childhood: How the Porn Industry Just

Made the Case of Regulation // Dignity: A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence. 2023.

№ 8. Issue 1, Article 3, С. 1–9.

5. Eelmaa S. Sexualization of Children in Deepfakes and Hentai: Examining Reddit User Views //

Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022. № 26 (229). С. 229–247.

6. Lief D. A. Erotic Manga, its Artists, and the Pressures of Censorship: University Honors Theses.

Portland State University, 2019. 802 p.

7. Weitzer R. The Campaign Against Sex Work in the United States: A Successful Moral Crusade //

Sexuality Research and Public Policy. 2020. № 17. С. 399–414.

8. Guðrún Yaghi N. Barnaníðsefni Ákvæði 210. gr. a almennra hegningarlaga nr. 19/1940.

Meistararitgerð í lögfræði. Félagsvísindasvið, 2021. 109 р.

9. Law № 16 of 1960 on the Penal Code. URL: https://alp.unescwa.org/plans/154.

10. 2022’s Most Searched for Terms. URL: https://www.pornhub.com /insights/2022-year-inreview#categories.

11. Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun November, 26 2008 Tentang Pornografi. URL:

https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39740.

12. 中华人民共和国刑法 1997 年3月14日. URL: http://www.npc.gov.cn/ zgrdw/npc/

lfzt/rlys/2008-08/21/content_1882895.htm.

13. 형법18.09.1953. URL: https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?section= &menuId =1&subMenuId=

15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%98%95%EB%B2%95#J241:0.

14. 대법원 2014. 6. 12. URL: https://casenote.kr/%EB%8C%80% EB%B2%95% EC%9B%

90/2013%EB%8F%846345.

15. South Korea court rules explicit anime and manga drawings are images of child sex abuse.

URL: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/08/south-korea-court-rules-explicit-drawings-comicscartoons-child.

16. South Korea has jailed a man for using AI to create sexual images of children in a first for country’s courts. URL: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/27/ asia/south-korea-child-abuse-ai-sentenced-intlhnk/index.html.

17. Дело № 1-538/2023 Центрального районного суда г. Комсомольска-на-Амуре. URL:

https://centralny--hbr.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_ delo&name_op=case&case_id=2181 64206

&case_uid=29c7fdbc-3151-4ecb-af7c-8afbe7847bab&delo_id=1540006&case_type=0&new= 0&srv_

num=1.

18. Приговор Советского районного суда г. Брянска от 31 июля 2020 г. по делу № 1-49/2020.

URL: https://sovetsky--brj.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name= sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=case&case

_id=160166274&case_uid=b2945dc0-cee3-4784-8550-46911ffb5abc&delo_id=1540006.

19. Almenn hegningarlög lög nr. 19/1940 frá 12. febrúar 1940. URL: https://www.althingi.is/

lagas/nuna/1940019.html.

20. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). URL: https://www.law. cornell.edu/

supremecourt/text/413/15.

21. United States v. Handley, 564 F. Supp. 2d 996 (S.D. Iowa 2008). URL: https://law.

justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/564/996/1407869.

22. 18 U.S. Code Part I – Crimes. Act May 24, 1949. URL: https://www. law. cornell.

edu/uscode/text/18/part-I.

23. Crimes Act № 40 of 19001900. URL: http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/

au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082/.

24. McEwen v. Simmons, SC 2008/11248 (NSW S.C. 2008). URL: https://www.nswlr.com.

au/preview/73-NSWLR-10.

25. Ley Orgánica 10/1995 del Código Penal España de 24 mayo 1996. URL:

https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/1995/11/23/10/con.

26. Circular 2/2015, de 19 de junio 2015, sobre los delitos de pornografía infantil tras la reforma

operada por Ley Orgánica 1/2015. URL: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=FIS-C-2015-00002/.

27. Criminal Code Finnish 39/1889 Desember, 19 1889. URL: https://www.finlex.fi

/en/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039_20210433.pdf.

28. Código Penal Colombia Ley 599 de 2000. URL: https://leyes.co/codigo_penal/218.htm.

29. Penal Code. Act № 45 of 1907. URL: https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/

laws/view/3581/

30. Kishi Motonori v. Japan, Tokyo Saibansho (Tokyo High Ct.) June 16, 2005, № 458. URL:

https://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_jp/search2.

Published

2024-06-28 — Updated on 2026-07-21

Versions