PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAW: PROBLEMS OF CORRELATION OF INTERESTS AT THE PRESENT STAGE

Authors

  • Guzel M. Aznagulova Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
  • Maria E. Cheremisinova Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
  • Ekaterina A. Motova Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law240312

Keywords:

state and law, interests in law, public law, private law, legal system, methods of legal regulation.

Abstract

The question of the relationship between public and private law is the subject of many
scientific and legal studies. This issue is of particular relevance due to its relationship with the category of interest, which is a criterion for dividing law into private and public, which has become
stable in legal science due to the need to develop systematic approaches to law and legislation.
The purpose of the study is to search for a theoretical justification of the relationship between
public and private law, which can serve as a consistent design of legal norms taking into account
the interests of the maximum number of subjects of law. This, in turn, will contribute to the development of balanced legal mechanisms for regulating public relations, the wider use of stimulating
forms of legal regulation, the development of new ways of legal influence on public relations and at
the same time the preservation of legal values, the identification of factors of effective interaction
between personal and public in public life. The specificity of the research lies in understanding the
possible directions of transformation of public and private law, the criteria of division into public
and private, which affects the formation of the legal system in its philosophical, theoretical and instrumental meaning. The analysis of classical works devoted to interests in law, carried out in the
research, provides an additional justification for the importance of the category of interest in the
evolutionary development of law and legislation.
This topic has prospects for development in the context of modern problems of the theory of
law and state, including those related to the processes of digitalization, integration and regionalization, in which the underestimation of interests in the introduction and use of legal mechanisms can
become a serious obstacle to obtaining a positive result.

Author Biographies

Guzel M. Aznagulova, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Acting Head of the Department of
Theory of Law and Interdisciplinary Studies of Legislation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative
Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Maria E. Cheremisinova, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Senior Researcher at the Department of
Theory of Law and Interdisciplinary Studies of Legislation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative
Law at the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Ekaterina A. Motova, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

junior Researcher at the Department of Legal Theory and Interdisciplinary
Studies of Legislation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the
Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

References

1. Азнагулова Г. М., Андриченко Л. В., Васильева Л. Н. Интересы в механизме публичной

власти: проблемы теории и практики: монография. М.: Проспект, 2023. 272 с.

2. Витрук Н. В. Основы теории правового положения личности в социалистическом обществе. М.: Наука, 1979. 229 с.

3. Витрук Н. В. Правовой статус личности в СССР. М.: Юридическая литература, 1985.

175 с.

4. Губаева Т. В., Гумеров Л. А., Краснов А. В. Нормы права: теоретико-правовое исследование: монография. М.: РАП, 2014. 164 с.

5. Еллинек Г. Общее учение о государстве. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс, 2004. 750 с.

6. Ильин И. А. Теория права и государства. М.: Зерцало, 2003. 550 с.

7. Коркунов Н. М. Лекции по общей теории права. СПб.: Юридический центр Пресс, 2003.

428 с.

8. Леонова Ю. А. Право на цитирование: опыт России и Германии // Интеллектуальная собственность. Авторское право и смежные права. 2018. № 3. С. 21–36.

9. Мальцев Г. В. Соотношение частного и публичного права: проблемы теории // Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных стран: учебное пособие. М.: МЦФЭР, 2004. С. 718–759.

10. Мальцев Г. В. Социальные основания права. М.: Норма, 2007. 799 с.

11. Ожегов С. И. Словарь русского языка. М.: Русский язык, 1984. 797 с.

12. Петражицкий Л. И. Теория права и государства в связи с теорией нравственности. СПб.:

Тип. Т-ва «Екатерингофское печатное дело». Т. 1. 1909. 318 с.

13. Путило Н. В. Права человека в контексте понимания свободы и ответственности // Философия права. М.: Статут, 2018. 222 с.

14. Пашенцев Д. А. Модернизация методологии правовых исследований в условиях становления новой научной рациональности // Журнал российского права. 2020. № 8. С. 5–13.

15. Теория государства и права: учебник для вузов / отв. ред. В. Д. Перевалов. М., 2007. 415 с.

16. Тихомиров Ю. А. Право: традиции и новые повороты: монография. М.: Проспект, 2021.

208 с.

17. Тихомиров Ю. А. Публичное право: учебник для юридических факультетов и вузов. М.:

Бек, 1995. 485 с.

18. Терентьева Н. А. Вопрос о значимости разделения права на публичное и частное в отечественной правовой науке // Право и государство: теория и практика. 2017. № 9 (153). С. 6–8.

19. Хабриева Т. Я. Национальные интересы и законодательные приоритеты России // Журнал

российского права. 2005. № 12. С. 19–29.

20. Фасмер М. Этимологический словарь русского языка: в 4 т. М.: Прогресс, 1987. Т. 3.

830 с.

Published

2024-09-26 — Updated on 2026-07-21

Versions

Issue

Section

Публично-правовые (государственно-правовые) науки