НАЗНАЧЕНИЕ БОЛЕЕ МЯГКОГО НАКАЗАНИЯ,  ЧЕМ ПРЕДУСМОТРЕНО ЗА ДАННОЕ ПРЕСТУПЛЕНИЕ,  КАК СРЕДСТВО ИНДИВИДУАЛИЗАЦИИ НАКАЗАНИЯ

Lydia V. Krasutskih

doi:10.14529/law250104

Authors

Lydia V. Krasutskih Russian State University of Justice, Chelyabinsk, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law250104

Keywords:

sentencing, more lenient sentencing, principles of justice and legality, legal incident, judicial practice

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of the theory and rules of application of Article 64 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author draws attention to the legal uncertainty of the rules laid down by the legislator for assigning a more lenient punishment than provided for by the sanction of the article. Attention is drawn to the inconsistency of these rules with the principles of justice and equality, as well as with other rules for assigning punishment, which also provide for a reduction in punishment and its individuality. The term of unacceptability of the existing design of the rules contained in Article 64 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is proved.

Author Biography

Lydia V. Krasutskih, Russian State University of Justice, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law, Russian State University of Justice, Chelyabinsk, Russia

References

Брайнин Я. М. Принципы применения наказания по советскому уголовному праву // Научные записки Киевского государственного университета. 1953. Т. 12. Вып. 1. С. 75.

Брайнин Я. М. Уголовный закон и его применение. М., 1967. 240 с.

Сборник документов по истории уголовного законодательства СССР и РСФСР (1917–1952). М., 1953. 464 с.

Шаргородский М. Д. Вопросы общей части уголовного права. Л., 1955. 256 с.

Официальный сайт Челябинского областного суда. URL: http://oblsud.chel.sudrf.ru.