ИММУНИТЕТ ИЛИ ЗАЩИТА ОТ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬСТВ  ПРИ БАНКРОТСТВЕ ГРАЖДАН (ФИЗИЧЕСКИХ ЛИЦ)

Svetlana B. Polich; Svetlana M. Skryl

doi:10.14529/law250312

Authors

Svetlana B. Polich South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia
Svetlana M. Skryl Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law250312

Keywords:

bankruptcy of citizens (individuals), judicial insolvency (bankruptcy) procedures, immunity from debts, protection from obligations, “property” immunity, “executive” immunity, proper performance of obligations, procedures for executing judicial acts, grounds for excluding property from the enforcement procedure

Abstract

The problems of application of the insolvency (bankruptcy) legislation and the legislation on enforcement proceedings in the matter of the so-called "executive", "property" immunity from debts, de facto protection from obligations are studied, an "analytical cross-section" of arbitration judicial practice over the past five years on the designated issues is shown, some trends (grounds) for the application/non-application of immunity from debts (protection from obligations) are identified, a conclusion is made that does not require additional argumentation that immunity from debts, or protection from obligations, is rather an exception than a doctrinal "civilistic rule", from which it follows: no immunity from debts, protection from obligations in private law exists, there are only procedural grounds for excluding property from the procedure of enforcement proceedings.

Author Biographies

Svetlana B. Polich, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Civil Justice, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Svetlana M. Skryl, Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Civil Justice, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

References

Алексеев С. С. Проблемы теории права. Основные вопросы социалистического права. Свердловск, 1972. Т. 1. 396 с.

Бартошек М. Римское право: понятие, термины, определения. М., 1989. 448 с.

Васьковский Е. В. Учебник гражданского права. М., 2016. 380 с.

Полич С. Б. Дискреция некоторых принципов гражданского права // Вестник Арбитражного суда Московского округа. 2016. № 1. С. 73–84.

Полич С. Б. Правосубъектность и физическое лицо // Проблемы права. 2017. № 3 (62). С. 50–52.

Полич С. Б. О правосубъектности физического лица // Проблемы права. № 1 (65). 2018. С. 81–86.

Полич С. Б. Гражданская правосубъектность в Российской Федерации: современное со-стояние и научный прогноз: тезисы к выступлениям. Челябинск: Библиотека Миллера, 2025. 47 с.