TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF PUBLIC AUTHORITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HARM: PRIVATE LAW CONTROL MECHANISMS AND CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES OF THE RIGHT TO A FAVOURABLE ENVIRONMENT

Authors

  • Natalya S. Koneva South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law260304

Keywords:

tortious liability of public authority, damages, unity of public power, decentralised control, environmental harm, right to a favourable environment, judicial tort standard of lawful public conduct, evidential asymmetry, right of recourse against officials, public law tort

Abstract

The article examines the civil liability of public law entities for damage caused by unlawful acts of public authorities and their officials (Articles 1069–1070 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) within the framework of the doctrine of the unity of public power. The authors advance the thesis that a private tort claim performs not merely a compensatory function but also a systemic regulatory one: through the mechanism of decentralised judicial review, it identifies deviations from the constitutionally established standard of lawful exercise of public authority. Particular attention is paid to the environmental dimension of the public law tort, in which the public entity simulta-neously occupies the roles of regulator - bearing a positive constitutional obligation to ensure citizens' right to a favourable environment - and potential tortfeasor, acting through unlawful conduct of environmental supervisory bodies. The article identifies structural constraints on the tort mechanism within the Russian legal order and formulates directions for doctrinal development.

Author Biography

Natalya S. Koneva, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate professor, head of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Law Institute, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia.

References

Губаева А. К. Некоторые современные тенденции развития института деликтной ответственности (сравнительно-правовой аспект) // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право. 2012. № 4. С. 20–31.

Губаева А. К. Теория и практика национального деликтного права в ракурсе европейской цивилистики // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право. 2013. № 1. С. 92–106.

Ершова И.В., Шепель Т. В. Особенности обязательства по возмещению вреда, причиненного органами местного самоуправления (ст. 1069 ГК РФ) // Вестник Кузбасского института. 2018. № 2 (35). С. 177–187.

Малкова К. Э., Самсонов А. А. Возмещение экологического вреда: современные проблемы доказывания и расчета размера ущерба // Российские исследования. Право и политика. 2025. № 4. С. 23–42.

Омельянюк Г. Г., Вакула М. А., Никулина М. В. Проблемы определения стоимости ущерба, нанесенного объектам окружающей среды // Теория и практика судебной экспертизы. 2019. № 14 (3). С. 46–53.

Працко Г. С., Чикилдина А. Ю. Иски Росприроднадзора о возмещении вреда окружающей среде // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 5. Юриспруденция. 2014. № 2 (23). С. 22–27.

O'Donnell G. Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies // Journal of Democracy. 1998. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 112–126.

O'Donnell G. Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust // Democratic Accountability in Latin America / Ed. by S. Mainwaring, C. Welna. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2003. P. 34–54.

Fox J. Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say? // World Development. 2015. Vol. 72. P. 346–361.

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Публично-правовые (государственно-правовые) науки