ЭКО-ЭФФЕКТИВНЫЕ СТИМУЛИРУЮЩИЕ ПРАВОВЫЕ МЕХАНИЗМЫ РАЗВИТИЯ ИННОВАЦИЙ В СТРАНАХ БРИКС

Elizaveta Al. Gromova

doi:10.14529/law260309

Authors

Elizaveta Al. Gromova South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law260309

Keywords:

stimulating legal mechanisms, innovation, regulatory sandbox, special economic zone, small and medium entrepreneurship

Abstract

The article analyzes the existing stimulating legal mechanisms for the development of digital innovations within the framework of the BRICS alliance in terms of their correlation with the "green" agenda. The author proves the need to include an assessment of the environmental effectiveness of regulatory legal acts aimed at stimulating the creation and implementation of innovations and technologies. Having analyzed the acts on cooperation between the BRICS countries in the field of digitalization, as well as environmental protection, the author points out the existence of necessary prerequisites for the introduction of eco-effective approaches. In addition, the article examines the experience of the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation in implementing such approaches in assessing the effectiveness of legislation on incentive mechanisms and the results of such implementation.

Author Biography

Elizaveta Al. Gromova, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor of Civil Law and Civil Procedure Department, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia.

References

Арзамасов Ю. Г. Оценка регулирующего воздействия и риски в праве: опыт России и континентальной Европы // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2019. № 5. С. 4–31.

Гилязутдинова И. В., Киселев С. В., Дерман Д. О. Концептуальные основы оценки регулирующего воздействия государства на инновационную деятельность в сфере услуг // Вестник Казанского технологического университета. 2014. № 4. С. 346–353.

Громова Е. А. Экологизация законодательства о территориях с особым режимом экономической деятельности // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: Право. 2020. Т. 20. № 1. С. 23–28.

Громова Е. А. Стимулирующие правовые режимы предпринимательской деятельности в сфере цифровых инноваций и технологий. М.: Проспект, 2024. 324 с.

Громова Е. А., Мамаев В. В. Перспективы развития предпринимательского права в условиях экономической интеграции стран БРИКС // Право и бизнес. 2025. № 2. С. 2–5.

Коломиец Т. И. Развитие института оценки государственного регулирующего воздейст-вия на процессы инновационной деятельности в России // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2013. № 1 (21). С. 19–29.

Elder J. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining ration-ales, ends and means // Research Policy. 2023. No. 52. 104765.

Healy H., Martinez-Alier J., Kallis G. From ecological modernization to socially sustainable economic degrowth: lessons from ecological economics in Raymond L Bryant (ed), The International Handbook of Political Ecology (Edward Elgar, 2015) 586 p.

Kastrinos N., Mattias Weber K. Sustainable development goals in the research and innovation policy of the European Union // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020. No. 177. P. 1256–1259.

Liang Z., Zhang M., Mao Q., Yu B., Ma B. Improvement of eco-efficiency in China: A com-parison of mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments // International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health. 2018. Vol. 15 (7). P. 147–151.

Mohiuddin M., Regnière M.H., Su A., Su Z. The special economic zone as a locomotive for green development in China // Asian Social Science. 2014. No. 10 (18). P. 109–115.

Reins L., Ala-Lahti T. Innovation, precaution, and sustainable development in EU environ-mental law–a false trichotomy? // Journal of Environmental Law. 2025. Vol. 10. eqaf032.

Venema N. Achieving net zero emissions with machine learning: the challenge ahead // Nat Mach Intell. 2022. No. 4. P. 661–665.

Verschuuren J. Does Environmental Law Encourage or Obstruct Eco-Innovations: Evidence from Case Studies in the Netherlands // European Energy and Environmental Law Review. 2017. No. 26. P. 51–59.

Yan J., Zhou Y. Can Regulatory Sandboxes Enhance Financial System Resilience: A Systems Perspective on Regional Risk Mitigation Evidence from China // Systems. 2026. Vol. 14 (2). P. 185–189.

Zeng D.Z., Cheng L., Shi L., Luetkenhorst W. China’s green transformation through eco in-dustrial parks // World Development. 2021. No. 140. 105249.

Zhao J., Zhang R. Legal innovations for balancing environmental protection and public health in urban polluted areas // Front. Public Health. 2025. No. 13. 15571.