TO THE QUESTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL PURPOSE OF THE JUDICIAL-LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE SUPREME ARBITRATION COURT AND THEIR RATIO WITH LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Keywords:
constitutional and legal purpose of the legal positions of higher courts, the judicial system, the legal position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, judicial and legal position of the Supreme Arbitration Court, the judgmentAbstract
The article presents the author's reflections on the constitutional mission of judicial
positions to stop the activities of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the RF and their relation
to the legal positions of the Constitutional Court. The conclusion that the appearance
of the constitutional and legal positions of higher courts is proved, according to them the
existence of substantive and procedural prerequisites, as well as possible obstacles to
revision based on the unconstitutional acts of making, is the result of the highest court of
economic justice. Judicial and legal positions of higher courts are the elements of the
constitutional framework for the protection of the unity and consistency of the Russian
legal system. Judicial and legal positions of the SAC of the Russian Federation have their
constitutional and legal purpose of not normative obligation of lower arbitration courts to
take a definite decision in a particular case or cases of a similar nature (legal precedent),
but by the inherent standardization they should ask the vector of formulation and adoption
of the constitutional decisions, not excluding, however, that these decisions will be
adjusted according to the judicial interpretation of facts correctly (constitutionally) correlated
with the estimated legal concepts.
References
Гаджиев, Г. А. Методологические про-
блемы «прецедентной революции» в России /
Г. А. Гаджиев // Журнал конституционного
правосудия. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 5–8.
Ильинский, И. П. Конституционно-
правовое регулирование общественных отно-
шений / И. П. Ильинский // Общественные
науки. – 1977. – № 6. – С. 32–44.
Крусс, В. И. Конституционные крите-
рии независимости судей в контексте дефици-
та конституционного правопонимания /
В. И. Крусс // Проблемы независимости и
беспристрастности судей в Российской Феде-
рации: материалы науч.-практ. конф. – Тверь,
– С. 23–28.
Крусс, В. И. Конституция Российской
Федерации и отечественная наука права /
В. И. Крусс // Проблемы права. – 2013. –
№ 4 (42). – С. 30–31.
Султанов, А. Р. Очерк о применении
норм Конституции РФ и исполнении решений
Конституционного Суда РФ в арбитражных
судах и судах общей юрисдикции / А. Р. Сул-
танов // Вестник гражданского процесса. –
– № 2. – С. 283–313.
Шершеневич, Г. Ф. Общая теория пра-
ва: учебное пособие (по изданию 1910–
гг.): в 2 т. Вып. 1. / Г. Ф. Шершеневич. –
М., 1995. – Т. 1. – 308 с.
