FORMAL-DOGMATIC APPROACH TO THE LEGAL SCIENCE IN THE MODERN CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Aleksander Vasilievich Petrov South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
  • Aleksey Viktorovich Zyryanov South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law190114

Keywords:

formal-dogmatic approach, legal science, method, dogma, legal technique

Abstract

This article is devoted to the issue of the role and place of the formally dogmatic approach in legal science in the context of modernity. The historical transnational discourse of the formation of a formally dogmatic approach to law, its methodological orientation and conditionality has been implemented. Attention is focused on the concept and essence of legal dogma, its scientific interpretation, and its connection with legal technique. A comparative analysis of this approach with other approaches of legal research has been conducted. The theoretical and practical significance of the formally dogmatic approach in modern legal science and practice has been determined. It is established that jurisprudence can achieve its 

goals and be used for its own purpose in the case when it puts forward initial positions within the framework of the legal system, that is, the doctrine. The doctrine may be the subject of mastering jurisprudence studying the rules of the existence of law as a language in which subjects communicate in the face of public order. At the same time, the prevalence of the formally dogmatic approach can theoretically entail essential limitations in the process of cognition, since legal science has legal positivism as its basis.

Author Biographies

Aleksander Vasilievich Petrov, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Doctor of Sciences (Law), professor of Theory of State and Law Department, of Constitutional and Administrative Law, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Aleksey Viktorovich Zyryanov, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor of the Theory of State and Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law, South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

References

Алексеев, С. С. Собрание сочинений: в 7 т. / С. С. Алексеев – М.: Статут, 2010. – Т. 7. – 495 c.

Бабаев, В. К. Теория государства и права: учебник / В. К. Бабаев. – М.: Юристъ, 2003. – 592 с.

Байниязов, Р. С. Философия правосо-знания. Постановка проблемы / Р. С. Байниязов // Правоведение. – 2001. – № 5. – С. 31–40.

Волкова, С. В. Межвузовская конфе-ренция о проблемах юридической техники / С. В. Волкова, Н. И. Малышева // Правоведение. – 2006. – № 2. – С. 182–198.

Гроций, Г. О праве войны и мира / Г. Гроций. – М.: Ладомир, 1994. – 868 с.

Дождев, Д. В. Римское право / Д. В. Дождев. – М.: Инфра-М, Норма, 2003. –784 с.

Иванников, И. А. Теория государства и права / И. А. Иванников. – М.: РИОР; ИНФРА-М: Академцентр, 2012. – 352 с.

Нерсесянц, В. С. История политических и правовых учений / В. С. Нерсесянц. – М.: Норма, 2004. – 944 с.

Нерсесянц, В. С. Общая теория права и государства: учебник / В. С. Нерсесянц. – М.: Норма: ИНФРА-М, 2012. – 560 с.

Четвернин, В. А. Введение в курс общей теории права и государства: учебное пособие / В. А. Четвертин. – М.: Институт государства и права РАН, 2003. – 204 с.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-11

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2019): Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия Право.

Section

Problems and Questions on Constitutional and Administrative Law