How Deviations in OPL Parameters Affect the Stability-Critical Fault Clearance Time

Authors

  • P. Yu. Gubin Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
  • A. S. Tavlincev Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/power190205

Keywords:

overhead line parameter, transient stability, normal distribution, critical fault clearance time

Abstract

From weather-related uncertainty to geometrical errors of OPL design, numerous factors contribute to
the variations of impedance and conductance. Still, an unambiguous judgment can be made on how such variations could affect the transient stability does require additional simulations and computational experiments.

This research seeks to evaluate how deviations in the parameters of OPL equivalent circuits could affect the transient stability of generators.

To that end, the paper proposes a primitive trinodal test system for simulating random deviations in OPL equivalent circuit parameters so as to run multiple simulations of transients. Step One is to independently analyse each parameter in terms of how it affects the critical fault clearance time. Step Two is to simultaneously measure the line conductance and impedance and to monitor the curves of the test-network generators. The final step is to computationally analyse the collected data so as to find the controlled values as a function of equivalent-circuit parameters.

Experimentation has revealed two patterns; first, only random deviations in reactance significantly affect the stability. Second, as found at Step Two, random deviations result in significant uncertainty and scatter of
the parametric curves.

Thus, the research demonstrates that neglecting the possible deviations in equivalent-circuit parameters in the first approximation does affect simulation results.

Author Biographies

P. Yu. Gubin, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

-

A. S. Tavlincev, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

-

References

Akhmedova O.O. [Specified Algorithm for Calculation of Overhead Line Resistance Taking into Ac-count Meteorologic Conditions]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy [In-ternational Journal of Engineering and Fundamential Sciences], 2016, no.12, pp. 387–389. (in Russ.)

Berdin A.S., Kryuchkov P.A. Formirovaniye parametrov modeli EES dlya upravleniya elektricheskimi rezhimami [Forming Bulk Power System Model Parameters for Power system States Control]. Ekaterinburg, GOU VPO UGTU – UPI Publ., 2000. 100 p.

Venikov V.A. Perekhodnyye elektromekhanicheskiye protsessy v elektricheskikh sistemakh [Transient Electromechanic Processes in Power Systems]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Pupl., 1985. 536 p.

Gorev A.A. Perekhodnyye protsessy sinkhronnoy mashiny [Transient Processes of Synchronous Ma-chines], Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1985. 502 p.

Zhdanov P.S. Voprosy ustoychivosti elektricheskikh system [Stability Issues of Power Systems]. Mos-cow, Al’yans Publ., 2015. 456 p.

Ivanov I.E. [Estimation of Synchrophasor-Based Transposed Line Parameters by Analytical Methods]. Vestnik IGEU [Bulletin of Ivanovo State Power University], 2019, no. 1, pp. 30–42. DOI: 10.17588/2072-2672.2019.1.030-042

Idel’chik V. I. Elektricheskiye sistemy i seti [Power Systems and Grids]. Moscow, Energoatomizdat Publ., 1989. 592 p.

Metodicheskiye ukazaniya po ustoychivosti energosistem [Instructional Guideline for Power Systems Stability]. Moscow, NTS ENAS Publ., 2004. 16 p.

Novikov A.S. [Effect of Information Errors on optimal power flow]. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR [Bulletin of Academy of Sciences of the USSR], 2016, no. 2, pp. 22–29. (in Russ.)

Anderson P., Bose A. A Probabilistic Approach to Power System Stability Analysis. IEEE Transac-tions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1983, vol. 8, pp. 2430–2439. DOI: 10.1109/TPAS.1983.317742

Billinton R., Kuruganty P.R.S. Probabilistic Assessment of Transient Stability in a Practical Multi-machine System. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1981, vol. 7, pp. 3634–3641. DOI: 10.1109/TPAS.1981.316657

Christakou K., Paolone M., Abur A. Voltage Control in Active Distribution Networks under Uncer-tainty in the System Model: a Robust Optimization Approach. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2017, vol. 9, iss. 6,

pp. 5631–5642. DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2693212

Frank S., Sexauer J., Mohagheghi S. Temperature-Dependent Power Flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 4007–4018. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2266409

Kundur P. Power System Stability and Control. New York, Mc Graw Hill Education, 2015. 1196 p.

Zad B.B., Lobry J., Vallee F. Impacts of the Model Uncertainty on the Voltage Regulation Problem

of Medium-Voltage Distribution Systems. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2018, vol. 12, iss. 10,

pp. 2359–2368. DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1829

Zarco P., Exposito A. G. Power System Parameter Estimation: a Surve. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 216–222. DOI: 10.1109/59.852124

Published

2019-07-08

Issue

Section

Electric power engineering