ВОЗМЕЩЕНИЕ ВРЕДА, ПРИЧИНЕННОГО ПРОТИВОПРАВНЫМИ ДЕЙСТВИЯМИ (БЕЗДЕЙСТВИЕМ) СОТРУДНИКОВ ОРГАНОВ ВНУТРЕННИХ ДЕЛ: УСЛОВИЯ И ОСОБЕННОСТИ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ

Dinara B. Minnigulova; Anna V. Girvits

doi:10.14529/law230309

Authors

Dinara B. Minnigulova Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
Anna V. Girvits Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law230309

Keywords:

civil liability of the state, material and legal liability of an employee of the internal affairs body, compensation for harm, unlawful actions (inaction) of employees of internal affairs bodies, features of recourse liability of employees of internal affairs bodies, compensation for harm caused by illegal actions (inaction) of employees of internal affairs bodies

Abstract

This article reveals the main features of liability for damage caused by illegal actions
(inaction) of employees of internal affairs bodies. The regulatory framework of the designated legal institution is highlighted. The procedure and conditions for compensation for damage caused by illegal
actions (inaction) of employees of internal affairs bodies have been determined.

The analysis of general and special legislation on civil liability for harm caused by illegal
actions (inaction) by employees of internal affairs bodies was carried out, and based on the
analysis of judicial practice, typical situations of illegal actions (inaction) by employees of internal affairs bodies that caused harm to citizens (commission of a disciplinary offense, administrative offense, criminal offense) were identified, and also the procedure of recourse
claims of the Russian Federation in the person of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia to
employees who caused such harm is defined. A scientific analysis of the regulations on compensation for damage caused by illegal actions (inaction) of employees of the internal affairs
bodies allowed us to identify some legislative conflicts, first of all, the identified terminological discrepancies in the general and special norms on the legal institution under study. For example, the similarity of the concepts of "illegal" and "illegal" in the general and special norms
on compensation for damage caused by illegal actions (inaction) of employees of internal affairs bodies, obviously having etymological differences, requires legislative unification. The
authors propose to bring to uniformity the conceptual apparatus of the legal category analyzed
in the article for their effective enforcement.

Author Biographies

Dinara B. Minnigulova, Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia

Dinara B. Minnigulova, Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor of Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Department, Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Saint-Petersburg,
Russia.

Anna V. Girvits, Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Anna V. Girvits, Candidate of Sciences (Law), senior lecturer of Civil Law and Civil Procedure
Department, Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Saint-Petersburg,
Russia.

References

1. Гинц Е. М. Возмещение вреда, причиненного сотрудниками полиции // Вестник Московского университета МВД России. 2012. № 6. С. 52–54.

2. Илюшина М. Н. Регрессные требования Министерства финансов Российской Федерации в механизме возмещения имущественного вреда, причиненного незаконными действиями работников полиции // Гражданское право. 2019. № 2. С. 21–25.

3. Шокотько М. А. Репутационный вред юридического лица: особенности доказывания // Право и управление. 2022. № 10. C. 75–79.