CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAW

Abstract

After making amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted by
popular vote on December 12, 1993, in 2020, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, focusing on ensuring a systematic understanding of the updated Constitution as the valuemethodological basis of the national future, being at the very center of realizing the meaning and spirit of the Constitution of the state social and public life in all its various manifestations, consistently
continues to form the conceptual foundations for the consistent implementation of the Constitution
throughout the legal system.

The adoption of a law is a complex and multi-stage procedure. At the same time, when
adopting a law, the legislator must take into account the socio-economic realities in the country in
which the law is adopted. In this regard, the “clumsy” parliament does not always have time to
respond quickly and establish the rules of behavior in society that it needs. The complexity of the
adoption of the law, therefore, the lack of the ability to quickly respond to changing reality is the
basis for judicial law-creativity. One of these bodies should include the Constitutional Court of
the Russian Federation.
When resolving any dispute about law, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation,
trying to outline the legal space of possible consent, finds a way to resolve the dispute within
such a space. At the same time, the Court evaluates the results of the essential legal principle of
equality from the position of the constitutional legal approach and correlates them with the provisions of the Constitution.
This article analyzes the domestic doctrine and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of
the Russian Federation in the designated area. It is concluded that the development of Russian
law through the prism of constitutional control can be associated with the process of formation of
scientific, public and legislative interest in the problem of the effectiveness of rule-making and
law enforcement in general