FRAMEWORK LEGAL ACTS AND NON-STANDARD LEGAL INSTRUCTIONS

Authors

  • Kseniia E. Dovgan Institute of Law, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia
  • Natalia E. Kovalenko Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14529/law230415

Keywords:

framework legal acts, limits of legal regulation, uncertainty, concretization, norms of law.

Abstract

The general features of framework legal acts, which have different provisions in the
legislation of individual countries, have been studied. It has been established that the framework
legal acts contain positive uncertainty, which is expressed in the relative certainty of the content.
Framework legal acts are characterized by logical incompleteness, which is the basis of lawmaking.
Also problematic are characteristics such as accuracy and clarity of content, which increase legal
uncertainty. The uncertainty of the content is concretized on the basis of law-making and law
enforcement activities by authorized entities within the advising framework. The author comes to
the conclusion that the framework legal acts establish criteria for legal regulation, which are
associated with a reference to the features of regulated legal relations: economic, political, natural,
geographical, demographic and others. Basically, these criteria are fixed as the need to take into
account the historical, national and other traditions of the relevant territory.

Author Biographies

Kseniia E. Dovgan, Institute of Law, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia

Kseniia E. Dovgan, Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, Institute of Law, Altai State
University, Barnaul, Russia.

Natalia E. Kovalenko, Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia

Natalia E. Kovalenko, Post-graduate student, Institute of Law, Altai State University, Barnaul,
Russia.

References

1. Васьковский Е. В. Цивилистическая методология. Учение о толковании и применении

гражданских законов. М., 2002. 507 c.

2. Власенко Н. А. Разумность и определенность в правовом регулировании: монография. М.:

НИЦ ИНФРА-М, ИЗиСП, 2014. 154 с.

3. Лагун Д. А. Белорусская юридическая энциклопедия: в 4 т. Минск: ГИУСТ БГУ, 2007. Т. 1.

URL: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/48070.

4. Михалева Н. А. Конституции и уставы субъектов Российской Федерации (сравнительноправовое исследование). ЮРКОМПАНИ, 2010. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/edu/student/

download_ books/ book/ mikhaleva _na_konstitucii_ustavy_subjektov_rossijskoj_federacii/.

5. Рыбаков В. А. Нетипичные нормы права // Вестник Омского университета. Серия: Право.

2013. № 3 (36). С. 24–29.

6. Семенов М. И. Представительные органы местного самоуправления в Российской

Федерации: конституционно-правовой анализ: дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. 2002. 147 с.

7. Тихомиров Ю. А. Курс сравнительного правоведения. М.: НОРМА, 1996. 432 с.

8. Черданцев А. Ф. Правовое регулирование и конкретизация права // Применение советского

права: сб. статей. Свердловск, 1974. С. 15–37.

9. Юридическая техника / под ред. Т. Я. Хабриевой, Н. А. Власенко. М., 2009. 272 с.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-13 — Updated on 2026-07-17

Versions

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 4 (2023): Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия Право.

Section

Теоретико-исторические правовые науки