ABOUT THE CHANGE IN THE MEANING OF COGNATES WHILE BORROWING IN THE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Ludmila Timoshenko Bashkir State University (Ufa)

Keywords:

cognates, borrowings, semantic derivation, explication of sense, semantic variation

Abstract

The topicality of problems in the given article is determined by the desire for clarity of the expressed
sense on the part of communicants in the use of foreign borrowings. The novelty of the material
consists in the huge unexplored aspect of the explication of semantic derivation of borrowings as a way of sense development of the meaning while borrowing, admitting non-categoric interpretation. Constructing associations, the search for similar semes by the linguist-interpreter paves the way for the readers, interested in the etymology of borrowings, but lacking all the necessary handy means and methods. The correctness of terminological system of the article may cause criticism due to the unexplored character of the aspect of semantic derivation explication. Methods of investigation applied in the given article are comparative-historic, etymological, introspective, experimental, associative methods. Among the cited methods the introspective and associative ones can be called relatively new. The provability of the conclusions of the article is verified by the “corridor” or “variation”, in Ye.V. Uryson’s terminology, between the correlation of semantics of the borrowings of dictionary meanings and the modern spoken usage of the borrowings, that is that the “final points” are well known. The author of the article tried to keep to the logic of expressing the material, substantiating her ideas with the opinions of the authoritative linguists

Author Biography

Ludmila Timoshenko, Bashkir State University (Ufa)

Candidate Degree in Philology, Assistant Professor, Department of the Foreign Languages, Bashkir State University (Ufa), lyudmila.timosh@mail.ru

References

Akulenko V.V. Voprosy internatsionalizatsii slovarnogo sostava yazyka [The Problems of Internationalization

of Word Stock]. Kharkov, Kharkov University Publishers, 1992, 213 p.

Greenberg J. Diachrony, Synchrony and Language Universals. Universals of Human Language. Vol. III.

Word Structure. Stanford, Stanford University Press. 1978. Pp. 47–82.

Timoshenko L.O. Slovar leksicheskikh sootvetstviy yevropeiskikh yazykov (russkogo, angliyskogo, frantsuzskogo,

nemetskogo). [Timoshenko L.O. The Dictionary of Lexical Correspondences of European Languages

(Russian, English, French, German)]. Ufa: BSU Publishers, 2012. 644 p.

Krysin L.P. Variativnost normy kak yestestvennoye svoistvo literaturnogo yazyka. [Krysin L.P. Norm

Variation as a Natural Property of the Literary Language]. Izvestia RAN. Literature and Language Series. V. 70.

№ 1. 2011. Pp. 3–9.

Koseriu E. Synchroniya, diachroniya i istoriya [Coseriu E. Synchrony, Diachrony and History]. New in

Linguistics. Issue 3. Moscow, Progress, 1963. pp. 143–343.

Gorbov A.A. O nekotorykh problemakh interpretatsii inoyazychnogo materiala pri opisanii novykh

zaimstvovaniy v russkom yazyke [On Some Problems in the Interpretatyion of Foreign Material while Describing

New Borrowings in Russian]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. № 6. 2011. pp. 28–41.

Bolshoi tolkovyi slovar russkogo yazyka. [The Great Interpretative Russian Dictionary]. St.Peterburg: Norint

Publ., 2004. 1535 p. .

Gak V.G., Ganshina K.A. Novyi frantsuzsko-russkiy slovar [The New French-Russian Dictionary]. Moscow,

The Russian Language Publ., 1997. 1195 p.

Fromm E. Zdorovoye obshchestvo [Fromm E. The Healthy Society]. Moscow, AST, 2006, 540 p.

Hjell L., Ziegler D. Teorii lichnosti [Theories of Personality]. St. Peterburg, Piter Publ, 1998. 606 p.

Solovyev V.D., Faskhutdinov R.F. Metodika otsenki stabilnosti grammaticheskikh svoistv [Methods of

Stability Evaluating of Grammar Properties]. Izvestiya RAN. Literature and Language Series. Moscow, Nauka,

V. 68. № 4. 80 p. p. 34.

Uryson Ye.V. Problemy issledovaniya yazykovoy kartiny mira. Analogiya v semantike. [The Problems of

Language World Picture Investigation. Analogy in Semantics]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture, 2003. 223 p.