ON DEVELOPING TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING SCIENTIFIC WRITING

Authors

  • Svetrlana Sheremetyeva South Ural State University

Keywords:

scientific text, computer tool for authoring, readability, translatability

Abstract

In the paper a strong need for effective computer support in professional writing is put into focus.
Barriers to human understanding (readability) and translation of scientific texts are discussed. Special attention is paid to the suitability of a scientific text for machine translation (translatability), which is now widely used not withstanding its imperfect quality. A computer-based authoring methodology to attend these issues is described. Authoring is viewed as an interactive procedure that makes professionals aware of the typical areas of concern and controls the linguistic parameters of a document thus raising its readability and translatability. The methodology is implemented into a computer tool for research papers on engineering for the Russian-English language pair. The approach described can be applied to other languages and domains.

Author Biography

Svetrlana Sheremetyeva, South Ural State University

Doctor of Philological Science, Professor of the Linguistics and Intercultural Communication Department, South Ural State University, sheremetevaso@susu.ru

References

Allen D. A Study of the Role of Relative Clauses

in the Simplification of News Texts for Learners of

English. System. 2009. 37 (4), pp. 585–599.

Karpov N., Baranova J., Vitugin F. Singlesentence

Readability Prediction in Russian in Analysis

of Images, Social Networks and Texts. Communications

in Computer and Information Science. 2014.

Vol. 436, pp. 91–100.

Kincaid J.P., Fishburne R.P., Rogers R.L. &

Chissom B.S. Derivation of New Readability Formulas

(Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and

Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel,

Research Branch Report 8–75, Millington,

TN, Naval Technical Training, Memphis, 1975. 75 p.

Krioni N., Nikin A., Filippova A. Automated

System for Analysis of the Complexity of

Educational Texts. Manag. Soc. Econ. Syst. 2008,

, pp. 101–107.

Nyberg E., T Mitamura, D. Svoboda, J. Ko,

K. Baker, J. Micher. 2003. An Integrated System for

Source Language Checking, Analysis and Terminology

management. Proceedings of Machine Translation

Summit IX, 2003. September. New-Orleans.USA,

pp. 75–83.

Oborneva I. Automatic Assessment of the

Complexity of Educational Texts on the Basis of Statistical

Parameters. 2006.

Pooneh Heydari and A. Mehdi Riazi. Readability

of Texts: Human Evaluation Versus Computer

Index. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,

, January, Vol. 3 (1). pp. 104–112.

Reuther U. Two in one – Can it work?

Readability and Translatability by Means of Controlled

Language. Proceedings of EAMT-CLAW03,

Controlled Language Translation. Dublin, 2003,

pp. 124–132.

Underwood N.L. and Jongejan B. Translatability

Checker: A Tool to Help Decide Whether to Use

MT. Proceedings of MT Summit VIII, Santiago de

Compostela, Spain, 2001, pp. 125–133.

Sheremetyeva S. Controlled Authoring In

A Hybrid Russian-English Machine Translation System.

Proceedings of the workshop “Third Workshop

on Hybrid Approaches to Translation” in conjunction

with the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of

the Association for Computational Linguistics. Gothenburg,

Sweden, 2014, pp. 78–86.

Sheremetyeva S. On Getting the Most out

of Internet Resources to Raise Translation Quality

Of Professional Documentation. Journal of General

and Professional Education, iss. 4, 2012, pp. 94–

Issue

Section

Articles