Model of valuation on the example of the metallurgical enterprise

Oleg I. Dranko
V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Evgeniy V. Blagodarnyy
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Moscow, Russia


Abstract


The management of organizations essentially depends on the choice of criteria for the functioning and development. At the initial stage of the transition to a market economy, the main criterion for many Russian organizations was cash flow. The following criterion is the net income (financial result), provided sufficient cash flow. The disadvantage of this criterion is its short duration. This paper highlights the value creation approach to management. This approach is widely used in managing Western organizations, but it is pretty new for Russia and requires adaptation in Russian organizations. Purpose of the study. The study’s primary purpose is to develop models and methods to improve the efficiency of organizations in the real sector. This paper discusses the development of a model for assessing the value of an organization by the income method using discounted cash flows. The issue of creation/destruction (increase or decrease) of value with an increase in revenue is being considered. For many Russian organizations, business growth is accompanied by a decrease in value. A criterion for creating value has been developed, non-observance of which will lead to the destruction (increase) of value with an increase in revenue. Materials and methods. A two-period model for evaluating the cost in an analytical form was used. The va­lue model is designed for “mature” organizations characterized by stable development parameters: operational profitability and capital-to-output ratio. Results. One of the largest metallurgical organizations in Russia is considered as the object of research. Collected and processed initial data on the financial and economic condition of this organization. The valuation model was applied to one of the metallurgical companies in Russia. The accuracy of the calculation results for the valuation was 6% in relation to the actual market price, which can be considered a satisfactory result. Conclusion. This approach simplifies the assessment of the company’s value and develops measures to increase (rather than reduce) its value. An increase in the revenue of an unattractive investment company leads to its value destruction (decrease). Instead of a positive result, stakeholders get a negative one, given the seemingly favorable dynamics of the organization’s development. The proposed model is typical and can be used to analyze the development of many “mature” organizations.


Keywords


business valuation model, Value-Based Management, value creation/destruction, investment attractiveness, business growth, simulation

References


Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective // Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2001. Vol. 32, iss. 1–3. P. 349–410.

Otley D. Performance management: a framework for management control systems research // Management Accounting Research. 1999. Vol. 10, iss. 4. P. 363–382.

Knauer T., Silge L., Sommer F. The shareholder value effects of using value-based performance measures: Evidence form acquisitions and divestments // Management Accounting Research. 2018.

Vol. 41. P. 43–61.

Corazza G. Value Based Management Systems and Firm Performance: An Analysis of the Literature // Management International Conference 2019: Managing Geostrategic Issues; Proceedings of

the Joint International Conference. Opatija, Croatia, University of Primorska Press, 2019. P. 77–89.

Beck V., Bretzelmaier B. Value Based Management – A Critical Literature Review // International Journal of Sales, Retailing and Marketing. 2012. Vol. 1, iss. 3. P. 3–20.

Blume K.H. Value-based management as a tailor-made management practice? A literature review // Journal of Management and Governance, 2016. Vol. 20, iss. 3. P. 553–590.

McKinsey & Company, Koller T., Goedhart M., Wessels D. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. 7th ed., New York, NY, Wiley Finance, 2020. 896 p.

Ausloos M. Valuation Models Applied to Value-Based Management – Application to the Case of UK Companies with Problems // Forecasting. 2020. Vol. 2, iss. 4. P. 549–565.

Hannington T. How to Measure and Manage Your Corporate Reputation. London, Routledge, 2016. 112 p.

Copeland T.E. Why value value? // The McKinsey Quarterly. 1994. No. 4. P. 97–109.

Ibrahimi M., Meghouar H. Sources of value creation and destruction in horizontal mergers and acquisitions // Managerial Finance. 2019. Vol. 45, iss. 10/11. P. 1398–1415.

Meckl R., Röhrle F. Do M&A deals create or destroy value? A meta-analysis // European Journal of Business and Economics. 2016. Vol. 11, iss. 2. P. 9–19.

Weiss S. A Governance Solution to Prevent the Destruction of Shareholder Value in M&A Transactions, 2019. URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3317584 (дата обращения: 20.12.2021).

Stokes P., Mahajan G., Lucas G., Hughes P. Creating Value – Value Co-Creation and Value Destruction // EFMD Global Focus. 2018. Vol. 12, iss. 2. P. 44–47.

Mahajan G. Critically Exploring Value Destruction to Create More Value // Journal of Creating Value. 2019. Vol. 5, iss. 1. P. 3–10.

Wei T., Clegg J. Exploring sources of value destruction in international acquisitions: A synthesized theoretical lens // International Business Review. 2017. Vol. 26, iss. 5. P. 927–941.

Pulic A. Do We Know if We Create or Destroy Value // International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. 2004. Vol. 4, iss. 4. P. 349–359.

Chakraborty A., Grant J.L., Trahan E.A. The EVA Style Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation // The Journal of Wealth Management. 2017. Vol. 20, iss. 2. P. 41–53.

Steiger F. The Validity of Company Valuation Using Discounted Cash Flow Methods, 2010. URL: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1003/1003.4881.pdf (дата обращения: 20.12.2021).

Дранко О.И. Аналитическая модель стоимости компании: факторы капиталистического соревнования // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. 2015. № 30(315). С. 2–15.

Dranko O.I. The Aggregate Model of Business Valuation by Three Methods // 13th International Conference “Management of Large-Scale System Development” (MLSD’2020). Moscow, IEEE, 2020. P. 1–4.

Damodaran A. Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation, and Implications – The 2021 Edition, 2021. 144 p. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3825823 (дата обращения: 21.12.2021).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/ctcr220108

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.