Methods and Features of Vortex Flowmeters Investigation

K. V. Alsheva

Abstract


The use of vortex flowmeters in industry is very popular due to their reliability and low cost, but there is a need to expand the measuring range towards low flows. Due to the specific design and operation principle, the vortex flowmeters have significant physical limitations when measuring flow at low flow rates. Commercial research of vortex flowmeters lasted for several decades and much attention was paid to improving the accuracy of flow measurement. Authors critically comprehended the traditional methods of improving the metrological characteristics of such flowmeters: methods of flow body and flow part investigation, methods of sensor and device for processing the signals of the measuring information investigation and algorithmic methods for increasing the accuracy of flow measurement. Attention was paid to algorithmic methods for increasing the accuracy of flow measurement, since the use of such methods requires only a change in the program of operation of the flowmeter’s microcontroller. Experimental investigation of the flowmeter measurement equation shows that the value of the Strouhal number at low flow rates is not constant, and consequently affects on the accuracy of flow measurement in this range. Subsequent investigations and the choice of the convertion function, considering the actual value of the Strouhal number, reduced the measurement error at low flows from 3 % to 0.5 %.


Keywords


vortex sonic flowmeters; convertion functions; the Strouhal number

References


Venugopal A. Review on Vortex Flowmeter – Designer Perspective. Sensors and Actuators, 2011, vol. 170, pp. 8–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2011.05.034

Yamasaki H., Rubin M. The Vortex Flowmeter. Flow Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, 1974, pp. 975–983.

Pankanin G.L. The Vortex Flowmeter: Various Methods of Investigating. Measurement Science and Technology, 2005, no. 16, pp. 1–16.

Miller R.W., De Carlo J.P., Cullen J.T. A Vortex Flowmeter – Calibration Results and Application Experience. Proc. Flow-Con 1977, Brighton, UK, 1977, pp. 549–570.

Bentley J.P., Mudd J.W. Vortex Shedding Mechanisms in Single and Dual Bluff Bodies. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2003, vol. 14, №. 1, pp. 23-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0955-5986(02)00089-4

Volker H., Windorferb H. Comparison of Pressure and Ultrasound Measurements in Vortex Flow Meters. Measurement, 2003, no. 33, pp. 121–133. DOI: 10.1016/s0263-2241(02)00057-x

Chen J., Min K., Zhong L. Vortex Signal Processing Method with Dual Channel. Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2011, pp. 2833–2837.

Jianbo M., Zu L., Liang D., Liang X. Adaptive Frequency Measurement (AFM) for Vortex Flowmeter Signal. Industrial Electronics, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium, 1992, no. 2, pp. 832–835.

Pankanin G.L., Berlinski J., Chmielewski R. Numerical Modelling of Vortices Development in Tapered Duct. Proc. of the International Symposium on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO XI. Groningen, The Netherlands, 2003.

Lapin A., Alsheva K. Investigation of the Strouhal Number in the Convertion Function for Vortex Sonic Flowmeters. International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), 2017. DOI: 10.1109/icieam.2017.8076401

Lapin A., Alsheva K. Modification Features of the Measurement Equation for Vortex Sonic Flowmeters. International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), 2016. DOI: 10.1109/icieam.2016.7911634

Lapin A., Alsheva K. Investigation of Conversion Function for Vortex Sonic Flowmeter Using Monte-Carlo Method. 2nd International Ural Conference on Measurements (UralCon), 2017. DOI: 10.1109/uralcon.2017.8120686

Gerrard J.H. The Mechanics of the Formation Region of Vortices behind Bluff Bodies. J. Fluid Mech., 1966, no. 25, pp. 401–413. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112066001721

Lucas G.P., Turner J.T. Influence of Cylinder Geometry on the Quality of its Vortex Shedding Signal. Proc. Int. Conf. on Flow Measurement FLOMEKO’85. Melbourne, Australia, 1985, pp. 81–88.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/ctcr180312

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.