EVOLUTION OF FEDERAL STATEHOOD: GLOBAL TRENDS AND NATIONAL IDENTITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14529/law230315Keywords:
federalism, unitarianism, centralization, decentralization, national identity, integration federalism, successful federalism.Abstract
Subject and purpose. The article considers the global trends in the evolution of federal statehood and the peculiarities of their manifestation in federal states, taking into account their
national identity. The general and distinctive features of the transformation of federalism models
in modern conditions of development are revealed.
Conclusions and prospects. Modern models of statehood are undergoing processes of hybridization, and it can be argued about the gradual dominance of hybrid (mixed) federalism as a principle, regime and form of government. There has been a steady trend of binarity in the centralization and decentralization of public power in federal states, due to both external and internal factors. The main external factor is globalization and the increasing role of international law and intergovernmental organizations in regulating the public system of States. The main internal factor
is the request to reflect the national identity and take into account the needs of a particular country. Under the influence of these factors, in order to optimize power and counter the challenges of
human civilization, the model of integration federalism is being approved - the unification of the
center and the constituent parts of the state to solve common problems of survival and development. This hybrid model flexibly integrates elements of unitarianism and federalism; dualistic,
cooperative, competitive (competitive) and solidary federalism.
To indicate the effective models of the federal structure at a certain stage of the development
of a particular country, the construction "successful federalism" is proposed. Its main qualities are
optimality, democracy (subsidiarity), efficiency and adequacy (reflection of national identity) of
the state structure. While preserving the necessary elements of centralization in a federal state
provided by the principles of state sovereignty, subordination of the system of national law and
unity of state power, as well as the vertical separation of state power based on a certain independence of the parties to federal relations, in the modern modification of federalism, the system of
public power is increasingly supplemented by the development of self-government, cooperation
and solidarity relations
References
1. Аболин О. Ю. Всемирный и европейский федерализм: вероятные перспективы // Политические исследования. 1994. № 5. С. 140–149.
2. Авакьян С. А. Конституционно-правовые проблемы централизма, демократии и децентрализации в современном государстве // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2005. № 8.
С. 2–7.
3. Басу Д. Д. Основы конституционного права Индии. М., 1986. 660 с.
4. Глигич-Золотарева М. В. Правовые основы федерализма. М.: Юристъ, 2006. 421 с.
5. Зуйков А. В. Размышления о российском федерализме // Государственная власть и местное
самоуправление. 2008. № 12. С. 21–25.
6. Монтескье Ш. Избранные произведения. М.: Госполитиздат, 1955. 799 с.
7. Российский федерализм. Экономико-правовые проблемы / отв. ред. С. Д. Валентей. СПб.,
2008. 320 с.
8. Станских С., Фогельклу А. Проблемы реформирования федеративных отношений в современной России // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 2005. № 11. С. 3–6.
9. Умнова И. А. Проблемы дефедерализации и перспективы оптимизации современной российской модели разграничения предметов ведения и полномочий в контексте доктрины субсидиарности // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. 2012. № 2 (87). С. 45–55.
10. Черепанов В. А. Федеративная реформа в России. М., 2007. 318 с.
11. Филиппова Н. А. Представительство публичных интересов в федеративном государстве:
особенности российской национальной модели. Екатеринбург, 2009. 394 c.
12. Эриашвили Н. Д. Теоретико-правовые основы развития федерализма в условиях централизации государственной власти в Российской Федерации // Государство и право. 2022. № 10.
С. 150–155.
13. Comparative federalism and Covid-19 Combating the Pandemic. Edited by Nico Steytler.
Routledge Studies in Federalism and Decentralization, London and New York, 2022, 433 p.
14. Devolution // Collins English Dictionary. Available at: www. collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/
english/devolution?showCookie Policy=true.
15. Elazar Daniel J. Federalism and the way to peace. Institute of intergovernmental Relations,
Queen,s University Kingston, Ontario, Сanada, 1994, 170 p.
16. Federalism and National Diversity in the 21st Century/ed. Alain-G. Gagnon, Arjun Tremblay.
Springer Link, 2020. 315 p.
17. Kincaid, John (ed.) (2019): A Research Agenda for Federalism Studies: Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 232 p.
18. Mitchell J. Devolution in the UK. Manchester and New York: Manchester univ. press, 2011,
272 p.
19. Palermo F. Foreword //Comparative federalism and Covid-19 Combating the Pandemic. Edited
by Nico Steytler. Routledge Studies in Federalism and Decentralization, London and New York, 2022,
pp. XYII–XYIII.
20. Putting Federalism in Its Place: The Territorial Politics of Social Policy Revisited / by Scott L.
Greer, Daniel Béland, André Lecours, and Kenneth A. Dubin.-University of Michigan Press, 2019,
241 p.
21. Steytler Nico How federations combat Covid-19 // Comparative federalism and Covid-19 Combating the Pandemic. Edited by Nico Steytler. Routledge Studies in Federalism and Decentralization,
London and New York, 2022, pp. 1–10.
22. Theorizing local migration law and governance / Ed. M. Baumgaertel, S. Miellet. Cambridge,
2022, 364 p.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-07-17 (2)
- 2023-09-18 (1)





