REDUCING THE ORDER OF COMPLEX MODELS USING THE ROBUST CONTROL TOOLBOX
Abstract
The city of Berezniki, Perm region is located on an underworked mine area. For several years, the city has been experiencing active subsidence of the soil, which provoke the destruction of buildings. Therefore, for several years now, the city's buildings and structures have been monitored, which makes it possible to analyze the degree of subsidence. Models of a sufficiently high order are used for an accurate analysis of the situation and forecasting. The article is about a possibility of modeling the deformation of buildings associated with soil subsidence, as a result of mine workings in the city of Berezniki. The purpose of the study is to consider the capabilities of the ‘Robust Control Toolbox’ for reducing the order of complexity of models. An example of an eight-story building included in the collection of reference examples for reducing models of linear dynamic systems is used. Materials and methods. Typical steps for solving the problem of model reduction are presented, commands and tools used to solve this problem are described. The parameters of the model in the state space are determined, which has 48 states, which are displacements or rates of change. The singular values of Hankel are used to select states that can be neglected. The model is reduced using an adaptive error boundary. Reduction using the multiplicative error bound is considered. Comparison of the results of reduction of the model by all described methods is carried out, the choice of the best method of reduction of the model is substantiated. Results. An analysis of the approximation error was performed for all the methods. The maximum relative error has been calculated. An example of calculating the order of the model for a given error value of 5% is given. The order of the result model is 34 states with the error less is then 1%, which is less than the original model. As a result, the AFCs of the original and reduced models, as well as the transient processes of the models, were constructed. The plots in the frequency domain of the models practically coincide, which indicates an adequate description of the system. Conclusions. As a result, it was shown that it is possible to reduce the size of the model by 14 orders of magnitude, goal achieved.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Перельмутер, В.М. Пакеты расширения MATLAB. Control System Toolbox и Robust Control Toolbox: практ. пособие / В.М. Перельмутер. – М.: СОЛОН-ПРЕСС, 2008. – 224 с.
Романова, И.К. Современные методы редукции систем и их применение к задачам анализа и синтеза систем управления / И.К. Романова // Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Спец. вып. «Специальная робототехника и мехатроника». – 2011. – С. 142–152.
Конструирование объекта управления. Часть I. Проблема редуцирования модели, размещения управляющих органов, измерительных устройств и оценки потенциальной робастности / Д.С. Бирюков, Н.А. Дударенко, О.В. Слита, А.В. Ушаков // Мехатроника, автоматизация, управление. – 2013. – № 6 – С. 2–6.
Vidyasagar, M. Control System Synthesis: A Factorization Approach / М. Vidyasagar. – London: The MIT Press, 1985.
An information theortic approach to model reduction based on frequency-domain cross-gramian information / J. Fu, C. Zhong, Y. Ding, J. Zhou // Proceedings of 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. – 2010. – P. 3679–3683.
Качественный анализ динамики позиционного регулирования температуры процесса восстановления титана / Ю.П. Кирин, А.В. Затонский, В.Ф. Беккер, Н.В. Бильфельд // Приборы и системы. Управление, контроль, диагностика. – 2008. – № 10. – С. 54–56.
Minimum information loss method on cross-gramian matrix for model reduction / J. Fu, H. Zhang, Y. Sun, C. Zhong // 129 proceedings of 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. – 2008. – P. 7339–7343.
Дядик, В.Ф. Теория автоматического управления / В.Ф. Дядик, С.А. Байдали, Н.С. Криницын. – Томск: Изд-во Томского политехн. ун-та, 2011. – 196 с.
Бильфельд, Н.В. Многокритериальное исследование систем управления / Н.В. Бильфельд. – Пермь: Изд-во Перм. нац. исслед. политехн. ун-та, 2015. – 440 с.
Matrix Eigensystem Routines – EISPACK Guide / B.T. Smith, J.M. Boyle, J.J. Dongarraet
et al. // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. – Berlin, 1976. – Vol. 6. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-07546-1
Matrix Eigensystem Routines – EISPACK Guide Extension / B.S. Garbow, J.M. Boyle,
J.J. Dongarr, C.B. Moler // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. – Berlin, 1977. – Vol. 51. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-08254-9
Поршнев, С.В. Об особенностях сингулярных чисел и сингулярных векторов выборочной корреляционной матрицы в методе SSA / С.В. Поршнев, Р. Фуад // Научно-технический вестник Поволжья. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 146–150.
Freitas, F. Gramian-based reduction method applied to large sparse power system descriptor models / F. Freitas, J. Rommes, N. Martins // Proceedings of IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. – 2009. – P. 1. DOI: 10.1109/PES.2009.5275568
Симахин, В.А. Робастные непараметрические оценки / В.А. Симахин. – Саарбрюкен:
LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co, 2011. – 292 с.
Никифоров, В.О. Управление в условиях неопределенности: чувствительность, адаптация, робастность / В.О. Никифоров, А.В. Ушаков. – СПб.: СПбГИТМО(ТУ), 2002.
Бильфельд, Н.В. Современные средства моделирования динамики системы автоматизации / Н.В. Бильфельд, Ю.И. Володина. – Пермь: Изд-во Перм. нац. исслед. политехн. ун-та, 2020. – 143 с.
Влияние нестационарности объекта управления на параметры установившихся автоколебаний / М.Н. Ерыпалова, В.Ф. Беккер, А.В. Затонский, Ю.П. Кирин // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Технические науки. – 2008 – № 4 (8) – С. 50–57.
Safonov, M.G. Model Reduction for Robust Control: A Schur Relative Error Method /
M.G. Safonov, R.Y. Chiang // International J. of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing. – 1988. –
Vol. 2. – P. 259–272.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/ctcr210407
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.