Evaluation of Large-Scale Railway Projects: an Unsystem Approach
Abstract
The problem of assessing the social effectiveness of large-scale railway projects (hereinafter referred to as the CPAW) is considered in this article in the light of J. Kornais system paradigm and its instrumental specification as a non-system approach. In this context, the CPCR is analyzed as large and complex socio-technical systems. The objects of research are the Lensko-Kamchatskaya and Subpolar railway lines, which are at the stage of pre-investment studies in the first case and partially implemented in the second, when the uncertainty of costs and results is extremely high. To assess the comparative effectiveness of these projects, computer products were used – foreign and domestic, designed to work within the framework of the theory of making complex decisions with semiverbal models and expert information. Computational experiments have shown that different computer products, as a means of supporting investment decision-making procedures, give analysts different recommendations about the preference of compared projects. It is shown that the reason is inadequate accounting for foreign products (as applied to large-scale projects) of the uncertainty factor. The conclusion is made about the productivity of the tools of the neosystemic approach implemented by the authors of the article as an integrator of verbal and mathematical models in evaluating large-scale projects in a situation of uncertainty.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Русский)References
Корнаи, Я. Системная парадигма / Я. Корнаи // Вопросы экономики. – 2002. – № 4. – С. 4–22.
Клейнер, Г.Б. Системная парадигма в экономических исследованиях: новый подход / Г.Б. Клейнер. – http://kleiner.ru/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Sistemnaya-paradigma-v-e%60konomicheskihissledovaniyah.pdf (дата обращения: 09.01.2019).
Клейнер, Г.Б. Эволюция институциональных систем / Г.Б. Клейнер. – М.: Наука, 2004. – 240 с.
Merton, Robert K. On Sociological Theories of the middle range / Robert K. Merton // On Theoretical Sociology. Five Essays. Old and New. –N.-I: Free Press; L.: Macmillan, 1967.
Квейд, Э. Анализ сложных систем / Э. Квейд; пер. с англ. под ред. И.И. Ануреева, И.М. Верещагина. – М.: Советское радио, 1969. – 520 с.
Хитч, Чарлз Дж. Военная экономика в ядерный век: пер. с англ. / Чарльз Хитч, Роланд Маккин; под ред. и с предисл. [с. 5–25] канд. экон. наук полк. А.А. Корниенко и канд. ист. наук кап. 1 ранга В.М. Кулакова. – М.: Воениздат, 1964. – 624 с.
Шнейдер, Ю.А. Теория множеств и теория систем / Ю.А. Шнейдер // Системные исследования. Ежегодник 1978. – С. 70–85.
Петраков, Н.Я. Фактор неопределенности и управление экономическими системами / Н.Я. Петраков, В.И. Ротарь; отв. ред. докт. физ.-мат. наук С.А. Айвазян. – М.: Наука, 1985. – 191 с.
Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process. – N.-Y.: McGraw Hill, 1980. – 288 p. DOI: 10.21236/ADA214804
http://www.gorskiy.ru/Articles/Dmss/AHP.html (дата обращения: 21. 02. 2019)
Подиновский, В.В. О некорректности метода анализа иерархий / В.В. Подиновский, О.В. Подиновская // Проблемы управления. – 2011. – № 1. – С. 8–13.
Boyle, H.F. Investment Analysis: US Oil and Gas Producers Score High in University Survey / H.F. Boyle, G.K. Sehenck // Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Dallas, 14–15 March, 1985.
Saaty, T. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process / T. Saaty // International journal of services sciences. – 2008. – Vol. 1. – P. 83–98. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Саати, Т. Принятие решений. Метод анализа иерархий: пер. с англ. / Т. Саати. – М.: Радио и связь, 1993. – 320 с.
Хуторецкий, А.Б. Экспертное оценивание объектов по неквантифицируемому критерию с помощью модели Бержа – Брука – Буркова: препринт / А.Б. Хуторецкий. – Новосибирск: ИЭ и ОПП СО РАН, 1994. – 15 с.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/ctcr190310
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.






