COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF MILK AS A RAW MATERIAL OF FARM ANIMALS

Authors

  • Olga N. Krasulya Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (Moscow)
  • Ksenia A. Kanina Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (Moscow)
  • Darya A. Kolpakova Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk)

Keywords:

organoleptic evaluation, “electronic nose”, goat milk, cow milk and sheep milk, physical-and-chemical indicators

Abstract

The issues of comprehensive (organoleptic and physical-and-chemical) assessment of quality
of milk obtained from various types of lactating farm animals are considered. Samples of milk of
Alpine goats, Ostfrisian sheep, white-and-black cows were chosen as objects of the research. Organoleptic
evaluation was carried out in two ways: with the help of expert tasters and using the
Voc-metr multi-sensor system called "electronic nose". Physical-and-chemical assessment was
based on the results of determining the chemical composition, as well as measuring the acidity,
density, viscosity, freezing temperature, dispersion of fat globules, and the presence of somatic
cells of milk samples. “Visual impressions” of smells of the objects under study are obtained. The
sample of cow's milk possessed the most intense smell (the area of “visual impression” was 24.64
c.u.), which was formed due to the presence of aldehydes, ketones, free amino acids and lowmolecular
nitrogen compounds in the gas phase of the milk. The results of the organoleptic evaluation,
obtained from professional tasters, are corresponding with the instrumental ones; this allows
us to recommend the multi-sensor system called “electronic nose” for implementation in order to
carry out assessment of quality of milk as raw material during its acceptance at milk-processing
plants. The results of assessing physical-and-chemical parameters of the quality of raw milk samples
show that they are within the optimal ranges established by regulatory documentation. Protein
content in sheep milk is 45 % higher compared to cow milk, and 37 % higher compared to goat
milk. It was determined that the minimal degree of dispersion of fat globules, which determines
milk’s availability, is contained in goat milk, which causes its wide use for child nutrition. The
“density” and “freezing point” indicators are indicators of the possible falsification of raw milk.
The obtained results of the abovementioned indicators' assessment prove the absence of falsifications
in the samples’ composition.

Author Biographies

Olga N. Krasulya, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (Moscow)

Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor of the Department of Techniques for Storage and Processing of Livestock Products

Ksenia A. Kanina, Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (Moscow)

postgraduate student of the Department of Techniques for Storage and Processing of Livestock Products

Darya A. Kolpakova, Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk)

Master’s degree student of the Department of Technology and Organization of Public Catering, Institute of Economics and Trade

References

Mayer K., Fiechter G. Physical and chemical characteristics of sheep and goat milk in Austria // International Dairy Journal. – 2012. – V. 24. – P. 57–63.

Горбатова, К.К. Химия и физика молока и молочных продуктов / К.К. Горбатова, П.И. Гунькова; под общ. ред. К.К. Горбатовой. – СПб.: ГИОРД, 2012. – C. 42.

ГОСТ 282883-2015. Молоко коровье. Метод органолептической оценки запаха и вкуса: Издание официальное. Введ. 2016-07-01. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2015. – 5 c.

ГОСТ 23327-98. Молоко и молочные продукты. Метод измерения массовой доли общего азота по Кьельдалю и определение массовой доли белка: Издание официальное. –

Введ. 2000-01-01. – Минск: Межгос. совет по стандартизации, метрологии и сертификации, 1998. – 8 с.

ГОСТ 32940-2014. Молоко козье сырое. Технические условия: Издание официальное. – Введ. 2016-01-01. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2015. – 5 с.

ГОСТ 3624-92. Молоко и молочные продукты. Титриметрические методы определения кислотности: Изд. официальное. – Введ. 4-01-01. – М.: ИПК Издательство стандартов, 1992; Стандартинформ, 2009. – 7 с.

ГОСТ 3625-84. Молоко и молочные продукты. Методы определения плотности: Издание официальное. – Введ. 85-07-02. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2009. – 13 с.

ГОСТ 3626-73. Молоко и молочные продукты. Методы определения влаги и сухого вещества: Издание официальное. – Введ. 74-07-01. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2009. – 11 с.

ГОСТ 54077-2010. Молоко. Методы определения соматических клеток: Издание официальное. – Введ. 2012-01-01. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2011. – 3 с.

ГОСТ 5867-90-2008. Молоко и молочные продукты. Методы определения жира: Издание официальное. – Введ. 91-07-01. – М: ИПК Изд-во стандартов: Стандартинформ, 2009. – 12 с.

ГОСТ Р 52054-2003. Молоко коровье–сырье. Технические условия: Издание официальное. – М.: ИПК Издательство стандартов, 2003; Стандартинформ, 2008. – 12 с.

Кемпбелл, Дж.Р. Производство молока / Дж.Р. Кемпбелл, Р.Т. Маршалл. – М.: Колос, 1980. – 670 с.

Тепел, А. Физика и химия молока / А. Тепел; пер. с немецкого под ред. канд. техн.наук, доц. С.А. Фильчаковой. – CПб.: Профес-

сия, 2012. – С. 234.

Шидловская, В.П. Органолептические свойства молока и молочных продуктов: справочник / В.П. Шидловская. – М.: КолосС, 2004. – 360 с.

Кузнецова, Т.Г. Сравнение основных сенсорных характеристик вареных колбас / Т.Г. Кузнецова, А.А. Лазарев, И.Г. Анисимова // Мясная индустрия. – 2014. – № 4. – С. 32–34.

Raynal-Ljutovac K., Lagrifoul G., Paccard., Guillet I & Chilliard Y. Composition of goat and sheep milk products: an update // Small

Ruminant Research. – 2008. – V. 79. – P. 57–72.

Renner E., Schmidt R. Chemical and Physico-chemical aspects // Bull. JDF. New Monograph on UHT milk. – 1981. – Ch. 3. – P. 49–63.

Nursten H.E. The flavour of milk and dairy products. 1. Milk of different kinds, milk powder, butter and cream // Journal Soc. Dairy

Tecnology. – 1997. – V. 50, № 2. – P. 48–56.

Dattatreya B.S., Kamath A., Bhat K.K. Developments and challenges in flavor perception and measurement: A Review// Food Reviews International. – 2002. – V. 18, № 2, 3. – P. 223–242.

Published

2018-01-15

Issue

Section

Quality management of bioproducts