HIGH-TECH DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENTERPRISE: FORMATION OF AN INTEGRATION- BALANCING MANAGEMENT MECHANISM

Anatoly А Аlabugin, Tatyana А Khudyakova, Andrey V Schmidt, Vadim V Volkov

Abstract


The article substantiates the relevance of the formation of a management mechanism for high-tech development of an enterprise in the context of the transformation of organizational and technological structures and the uncertainty of their impact. It is proposed to solve the problems of imperfection of management methods for high-tech development of an enterprise on the basis of the methodology of integration-balancing management. A hypothesis for improving the efficiency of the results of short-term jump-type processes of transition to a stable high-tech type of development based on the results of analog-digital modeling is formulated. It implies the possibility of regulating processes based on the economic interpretation of a certain set of management functions for such development. The hypothesis is proved using the mathematical tools of analytical approximation of generalized stepwise functions. It has been established that the assumptions on the sustainability of the effective implementation of management processes for the innovative development of an enterprise are achievable in the formed complex of objects of complementary fields of activity. Such results are achieved and maintained in the target values by methods of improving the quality of management and expanding the space for integrating methods and resources in the spheres of education, science and production. New organizational approaches to the formation of a development management center are proposed, additional functions of regulating the quality of management based on the integration of resources are formulated. Integration is provided by a new tool set, represented by an analog-digital model of an integration-balancing type of control mechanism, including information management systems and controlling the sustainability of effective development. The simulation results have proved practical recommendations for improving management at a small innovation enterprise in the context of interaction with the facilities of the complex. This helps to implement the project of its transfer to the high-tech type of development according to the factors of the V–VI organizational and technological structures of the economy.


Keywords


integration-balancing management; analog-digital model; high-tech development; Development Management Center.

References


Bloomberg, Coronavirus Could Cost the Global Economy $2.7 Trillion. – https://www.bloom-berg.com/graphics/2020-coronavirus-pandemic-global-economic-risk/ (дата обращения 15.04.2020).

Россия и мир: 2020. Экономика и внешняя политика. Ежегодный прогноз / рук. проекта: А.А. Дынкин, В.Г. Барановский; отв. ред.: Г.И. Мачавариани, И.Я. Кобринская. – М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2019. – 172 с.

Россия и страны мира 2018: статистический сборник / отв. ред. С.Н. Егоренко. – M: Росстат, 2018. – 375 c.

Худякова, Т.А. Формирование системы контроллинга финансово-экономической устойчивости промышленного предприятия: автореф. дис. … д-ра экон. наук: 08.00.05 / Худякова Татьяна Альбертовна. – Челябинск, 2018. – 40 с.

Алабугин, А.А. Модели теории и методологии интеграционно-балансирующего управления ресурсами интеллектуального труда и капитала в условиях сингулярности технологий: концептуальные основы исследования // Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции. – 2019. – № 4. – С. 10–20.

Brixner C., Isaak P., Suarez D., Yoguel G. Back to the future. Is industry 4.0 a new tecno-organizational paradigm? Implications for Latin American countries // Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10438599. 2020.1719642

Garcia-Flores V., Martos, LP., Social innova-tion: Key factors for its development in the territories //CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, So-cial y Cooperativa, 2019, vol. 97/2019, pp. 245–278. DOI: 10.7203/CIRIEC-E.97.14148.

Bhamra R., Nand A., Yang LL., Albregard P., Azevedo G., Corraini D., Emiliasiq M. Is leagile still relevant? A review and research opportunities // Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2020.1750360.

Аганбегян, А.Г. Сокращение затрат на человеческий капитал снижает экономический рост [Электронный ресурс] / А.Г. Аганбегян. – http://ruskline.ru/opp/2017/avgust/01/abel_aganbegyan_sokrawenie_zatrat_na_chelovecheskij_kapital_snizhaet_ekonomicheskij_rost (дата обращения 26.11.2018).

Cainelli G., De Marchi V., Grandinetti R. Do knowledge-intensive business services innovate dif-ferently? // Economics of Innovation and New Tech-nology, 2020, vol. 29, pp 48–65. DOI: 10.1080/ 10438599.2019.1585639.

Khalfallah M., Lakh L.The impact of lean manufacturing practices on operational and finan-cial performance: the mediating role of agile manu-facturing // International Journal of Quality & Reli-ability Management, 2020. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2019-0244.

Chen, R., Lee, Y.D., Wang, CH. Total quality management and sustainable competitive advantage: serial mediation of transformational leadership and executive ability // Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2020, vol. 31, pp. 451–468. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1476132.

Brito E., Pais, L., dos Santos NR., Figueiredo C. Knowledge management, customer satisfaction and organizational image discriminating certified from non-certified (ISO 9001) municipalities // Inter-national Journal of Quality & Reliability Manage-ment, 2020, vol. 37, pp. 451–469. DOI: 10.1108/IJQRM-10-2018-0281.

Bagis, M., Karaguzel, ES., Kryeziu, L., Ardic, K. A longitudinal analysis on intellectual structure of human resources management // Theoretical founda-tions and research trends, vol. 6, pp. 796–814. DOI: 10.30798/makuiibf.569513

Rocha C., Narcizo CF., Gianotti E. Internet of Management Artifacts: Internet of Things Architec-ture for Business Model Renewal // International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2019, vol. 16, No. 08. DOI: 10.1142/ S0219877019500627

Asif M. Are QM models aligned with Industry 4.0? A perspective on current practices // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, vol. 258. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120820.

Bilbao-Ubillos J.,Camino-Beldarrain, V., Intxaurburu-Clemente G. Industry 4.0, proximity constraints and new challenges for industrial policy // European Planning Studies, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1753660.

Hipp A., Binz, C. Firm survival in complex value chains and global innovation systems: Evi-dence from solar photovoltaics // Research Policy, 2020, vol. 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103876.

Xiao QZ., Shan, MY., Xiao, XP., Rao CJ. Evaluation Model of Industrial Operation Quality Under Multi-source Heterogeneous Data Information // International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2020, vol. 22, pp. 525–547. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-019-00776-x.

Asadi S., Pourhashemi SO., Nilashi M., Abdullah R., Samad S., Yadegaridehkordi E., Aljo-jo N., Razali NS. Investigating influence of green in-novation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry // Journal of Cleaner Pro-duction, 2020, vol. 258. DOI: 10.1016 /j.jclepro.2020.120860.

Casalet, M., Stezano F. Risks and opportuni-ties for the progress of digitalization in Mexico // Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2020.1719643.

Nhamo, G., Nhemachena, C. Using ICT indi-cators to measure readiness of countries to implement Industry 4.0 and the SDGs // Environmental Econom-ics and Policy Studies, 2020, vol. 22, pp 315–337. DOI: 10.1007/s10018-019-00259-1.

Casagrande-Seretti A., Montagna F., Cascini G. A decision support model to assess technological

paradigms // International Journal of Technology Management, 2019, vol. 80, pp. 61–84. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2019.099767.

Clegg B. Improving systemic success factors in a university to achieve more effective and efficient operations Using the PrOH modelling methodology // Business Process Management Journal, 2020, vol. 26, pp. 630–654. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0308.

Mitreva, E., Gorkov, EP., Gjorshevski, H., Tu-shi, B. Application of the Total Quality Management (TQM) Philosophy in a Macedonian Air Conditioning Company // Quality – Access to Success, 2020, vol. 21, pp. 45–51. Available at: https://www.srac.ro/ calitatea/en/authors_guide.htm...

Pisar, P., Bilkova, D. Controlling as a tool for SME management with an emphasis on innova-tions in the context of Industry 4.0. Equilibrium // Quarterly Journal of economics and Economic Poli-cy, 2019, vol. 14, pp. 763–785. DOI: 10.24136/ eq.2019.035.

Wang, SX., Lu, WM., Hung, SW. Improving innovation efficiency of emerging economies: The role of manufacturing // Managerial and decision economics, 2019, vol. 41, pp. 503–519. DOI: 10.1002/mde.3116.

Omelyanenko V. Institutional strategies of system security of technological & innovation systems // Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 2019, vol. 5, pp. 150–159. DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-1-150-159.

Weber, KM., Gudowsky, N., Aichholzer, G. Foresight and technology assessment for the Austrian parliament – Finding new ways of debating the fu-ture of industry 4.0 // Futures, 2019, vol. 109, pp. 240–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.018.

Szalavetz, A. Digitalisation, automation and upgrading in global value chains-factory economy actors versus lead companies // Post-Communist Economies, 2019, vol. 31, pp. 646–670. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2019.1578584.

Postula, M., Raczkowski, K. The Impact of Public Finance Management on Sustainable Devel-opment and Competitiveness in EU Member States // Journal of Competitiveness, 2020, vol. 12, pp. 125–144. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2020.01.08.

Li, DY., Heimeriks, G., Alkemade, F. The emergence of renewable energy technologies at coun-try level: relatedness, international knowledge spill-overs and domestic energy markets // Industry and Innovation, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020. 1713734.

Алюков, С.В. Аппроксимация ступенчатых функций в задачах математического моделирования / С.В. Алюков // Математическое моделирование, журнал РАН. – 2011. – Т. 23, № 3. – С. 75–88.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.