СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ СОСТОЯНИЯ РАЗВИТИЯ ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ПЛАТФОРМ В ЕВРОПЕЙСКОМ СОЮЗЕ И РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ
Аннотация
В статье рассматривается такой инструмент государственной инновационной политики, как техно-
логические платформы, выполняющие роль связующего элемента между частным, государственным и
научным секторами экономики.
На основании анализа исследовательского поля в сфере межфирменных взаимодействий было тео-
ретически доказано, что технологические платформы представляют собой продукт длительного эволю-
ционного развития форм кооперации экономических агентов. Одновременно была рассмотрена сущ-
ность феномена технологических платформ как механизма реализации государственной инновационной
политики на примере Европейского Союза, опыт которого лег в основу выстраивания подобных форми-
рований в Российской Федерации.
Затем был проведен сопоставительный анализ технологических платформ ЕС и России, позволив-
ший выявить основные методологические различия в подходах к их реализации. Особое внимание уде-
лено существующим в настоящий момент трудностям функционирования технологических платформ в
России, которые были классифицированы на основании результатов проведенного сравнительного ана-
лиза. Наряду с этим, были предложены наиболее перспективные направления приложения усилий с це-
лью повышения успешности реализации данного механизма государственной политики.
Ключевые слова
Полный текст:
PDFЛитература
Stiehm, Judith Hicks and Nicholas W. Townsend
(2002). The U.S. Army War College: Military
Education in a Democracy. Temple University Press.
p. 6. ISBN 1-56639-960-2.
Werner S. Recent developments in international
management research: A review of 20 top management
journals. Journal of Management, 28(3). 2002.
PP. 277–305.
Kim S., Matthyssens P., Martens R., Streukens
S. Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances.
Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6). 2011. PP.
–886.
Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic
Management Journal, 19(4). 1998. PP. 293–317.
Hamel G., Doz Y., Prahalad C. Collaborate
with your competitors – and win. Harvard Business
Review, 67(1). 1989. PP. 133–139.
Wassmer U. Alliance portfolios: A review and
research agenda. Journal of Management, 36(1). 2010.
PP. 141–171.
Draulans J., de Man A., Volberda H. Building
alliance capability: management techniques for superior
alliance performance. Long Range Planning,
(2). 2003. PP. 151–166.
Nohria N., Garcia-Pont C. Global strategic linkages
and industry structure. Strategic Management
Journal, 12(1). 1991. PP. 105–124.
Ford D. Guest editorial: The IMP Group and
international marketing. International Marketing
Review, 21(2). 2004. PP. 139–141.
1108/02651330410531358
Johnston W., Peters L., Gassenheimer J.
Questions about network dynamics: Characteristics,
structures, and interactions. Journal of Business
Research, 59(8). 2006. PP. 945–954.
Ford D., Redwood M. Making sense of network
dynamics through network pictures: A longitudinal
case study. Industrial Marketing Management,
(7). 2005. PP. 648–657.
Salmi A., Anderson H., Andersson P., Havila
V. Business network dynamics and M&As. 16th IMPconference,
Bath, U.K. 2000.
Harrison D., Holmen E., Pedersen A. How
companies strategize deliberately in networks using
strategic initiatives. Industrial Marketing
Management, 39(6). 2010. PP. 947–955. DOI:
1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.014
Järvensivu T., Möller K. Metatheory of network
management: A contingency perspective.
Industrial Marketing Management, 38(6). 2009. PP.
–661. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.04.005
Möller K., Halinen A. Business relationships
and networks: Managerial challenge of network era.
Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5). 1999.
PP. 413–427.
Möller K., Svahn S. Managing strategic nets:
A capability perspective. Marketing Theory, 3(2).
PP. 201–226.
Ritter T., Wilkinson I., Johnston W. Measuring
network competence: Some international evidence.
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,
(2). 2002. PP. 119–138.
Ritter T., Wilkinson I., Johnston, W. Managing
in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3). 2004. PP. 175–183.
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.016
Mouzas S., Henneberg S., Naudé P. Trust and
reliance in business relationships. European Journal
of Marketing, 41(9). 2007. PP. 1016–1032. DOI:
1108/03090560710773327
Mouzas S., Henneberg S., Naudé P. Developing
network insight. Industrial Marketing Management,
(2). 2008. PP. 167–180. DOI:
1016/j.indmarman.2007.01.003
Öberg C., Henneberg S., Mouzas S. Changing
network pictures: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions.
Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7). 2007.
PP. 926–940. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.010
Harrigan K. Joint Ventures and Competitive
Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2). 1988
PP. 141–158.
Mjoen H, Tallman S. Control and performance
in international joint ventures. Organization
Science, 8(3). 1997. PP. 257–274.
Killing J. Strategies for Joint Ventures.
Preager, New York. 1983.
Stuckley A. Vertical Integration and Joint
Ventures in the Aluminum Industry. Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1983.
Beamish P. The characteristics of joint ventures
in developed and developing countries.
Columbia J. World Bus, 20(3). 1985. PP. 13–19.
Buckley P., Mucchielli J. Multinational
Firms and International Relocation. Edward Elgar,
Cheltenham, UK. 1997. PP. 220–237.
Franco L. Joint venture divorce in the multinational
company. Columbia J. World Bus, 6(3). 1971.
PP. 13–22.
Gomes-Casseres B. Joint venture instability:
Is it a problem? Columbia J. World Bus, 22(2). 1987.
PP. 97–102.
Hennart J., Kim D., Zeng M. The impact of
joint venture status on the longevity of Japanese stakes
in US manufacturing affilates. Organizational
Science, 9(3). 1998. PP. 382–395.
Kent D. Joint ventures vs non-joint ventures.
An empirical investigation. Strategic Management
Journal, 12(5). 1991. PP. 387–393.
Li J. Foreign entry and survival: Effects of
strategic choices on performance in international markets.
Strategic Management Journal, 16(5). 1995.
PP. 333–351.
Park S., Russo M. When competition eclipses
cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture
failure. Management Science, 42(6). 1996. PP. 875–
Park S., Ungson G. The effect of national culture,
organizational complementarity and economic
motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of
Management Journal, 40(2). 1997. PP. 270–307.
Pennings J, Barkema H., Douma S. Organization
learning and diversification. Academy of
Management Journal, 37(3). 1994. PP. 608–640.
Holan P., Phillips N. Remembrance of things
past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting.
Management Science, 50(11). 2004. PP. 1603–1613.
Eisenhardt K., Schoonhoven C. Resourcebased
view of strategic alliance formation: strategic
and social effects in entrepreneurial firms.
Organization Science, 7(2). 1996. PP. 136–150.
Kogut B. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and
Empirical Perspectives. Strategic Management
Journal, 9(4). 1988. PP. 319–332.
Dyer H. Specialized supplier networks as a
source of competitive advantage: Evidence from auto
industry. Strategic management journal, 17(4). 1996.
PP. 271–291.
Anderson J., Rungtasanatham M., Schroeder
R. A theory of quality management underlying the
Deming Management Method. Academy of
Management Review, 19(3). 1994. PP. 472–509.
Juran J. Juran on Leadershipfor Quality. Free
Press, New York. 1989.
Dean J., Bowen J. Management theory and
total quality: Improving research and practice through
theory development. Academy of Management
Review, 19(3). 1994. PP. 392–418.
Dunne T., Roberts M., Samuelson L. Patterns
of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries.
The RAND Journal of Economics, 19. 1988.
PP. 495–515.
Richardson G. The organization of industry.
Economic Journal, 82(387). 1972. PP. 883–896.
Harrison B. Industrial Districts: Old Wine in
New Bottles? Regional Studies, 26(5). 1992.
PP. 4694–83.
Huber G. Organizational Learning: The Contributing
Processes and the Literature. Organization
Science, 2(1). 1991. PP. 76–92.
Powell W., Kopu K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Inter-
organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation:
Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1). 1996.
PP. 116–145.
Mitchell W., Singh K. Survival of businesses
using collaborative relationships to commercialize
complex goods. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3).
PP. 169–195.
Larson A. Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial
Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange
Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,
(1). 1992. PP. 96–104.
Baum J. Calabrese T., Silverman B. Don't go
it alone: Alliance network composition and startups'
performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic
Management Journal, 21(3). 2000. PP. 267–294.
Burt R. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. The
American Journal of Sociology, 110(2). 2004.
PP. 349–399.
Hargadon B. Brokering Knowledge: Linking
Learning and Innovation. Research and Organizational
Behavior, 24. 2002. PP. 41–85.
Podolny M. Market uncertainty and the social
character of economic exchange. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 39(3). 1994. PP. 458–483.
Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation
patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 40(4). 1995. PP. 619–652.
Powell W., Kopu K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Inter-
organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation:
Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1). 1996
PP. 116–145.
Mahnke V., Pedersen T., Venzin M. The Impact
of Knowledge Management on MNC Subsidiary
Performance: The Role of Absorptive Capacity.
Management International Review, 45(2). 2005.
PP. 101–119.
Kogut B. Joint Ventures: Theoretical and
Empirical Perspectives. Strategic Management
Journal, 9(4). 1988. PP. 319–332.
Giovanni D. Technological paradigms and
technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation
of the determinants and directions of technical change.
Research Policy, 11(3). 1982. PP. 147–162.
Gawer A. Platforms, Markets and Innovation.
Edward Edgar Publishing, Nothampton. 2009.
Hamel G. Competition for competence and
inter-partner learning within international strategic
alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1). 1991.
PP. 83–104.
Cohen M., Levinthal D. Absorptive Capacity:
A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1). 1990.
PP. 1128–1152.
Shan W., Walker G., Kogut B. Interfirm cooperation
and startup innovation in the biotechnology
industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5). 1994.
PP. 387–394.
Pil F.& MacDuffie J.P. The adoption of high
involvement work practices. Industrial Relations.
Powell W., Grodal. S. Networks of Innovators.
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. 2005.
Dezhina I. Technology platforms in Russia: a
catalyst for connecting government, science, and business?
Triple Helix, 1(6). 2014.
Luksha O. European technology platforms:
possibilities to use foreign experience for creation of
new instrument to support innovative development of
Russian economy. Innovations, 9. 2010. PP. 34–41.
Proskuryakova L., Meissner D., Rudnik P.
The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to
address research challenges and technology transfer.
Journal of Technology Transfer. Springer Science +
Business Media. New York. 2014.
Shelyubskaya N. Technology platforms –
mechanism for development of branch strategy and
cooperation (EU experience). Russia: tendencies and
prospects for development. Yearbook, 1. INION RAS,
Moscow. 2011. PP. 733–739.
Shelyubskaya N. European technology platforms
– from development of branch research priorities
to clusters. Innovations, 9. 2012. PP. 51–57.
Economides N., Katsamakas E. Two-Sided
Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology
Platforms and the Implications for the Software
Industry. Management Science, 52(7). 2006.
PP. 1057– 1071.
Lichtman D. Property Rights in Emerging
Platform Technologies. The Journal of Legal Studies,
(2). 2000. PP. 615–648.
European Commission (2010a). Strengthening
the role of European Technology Platforms in
addressing Europe’s Grand Societal Challenges Report
of the ETP Expert Group, October 2009, Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union,
A European strategy for Organic and Large
Area Electronics (OLAE). Vision paper. June 2013.
European Commission (2005) Report on European
Technology Platforms and Joint Technology
Initiatives: Fostering Public-Private НИОКР Partnerships
to Boost Europe’s Industrial Competitiveness.
Brussels.
Science, Technology and Innovation in Russia.:
brief data book / [Editor-in-chief L. Mindeli]. –
Moscow: ISS RAS, 2007–2014 / L. Mindeli, I. Zinovyeva,
O. Solomentseva et al. – 2015 – 108 p.
Science, Technology and Innovation in Russia:
brief data book / [Editor-in-chief L. Mindeli]. –
Moscow: ISS RAS, 2007–2013 / L. Mindeli, I. Zinovyeva,
O. Solomentseva et al. – 2014. – 90 p.
OECD Science (2010) Technology and industry
outlook. OECD, Paris.
OECD Science (2012) Technology and industry
outlook. OECD, Paris.
Интернет-портал «Инновации в России»,
раздел «Технологические платформы» [Internetportal
“Innovatsii v Rossii”, razdel “Tekhnologicheskie
platformy” [Internet-portal “Innovation in
Russia”, section “Technology platforms”]. Available
at: http://innovation.gov.ru/ru/taxonomy/term/2331
(accessed: 04.09.2016, 10:07).
Рудник П. Технологические платформы в
практике российской инновационной политики //
ФорсАйт, 2011. 5(1). С. 16–25 [Rudnik P. (2011)
Technology Platforms in the Russian Innovation Policy
Practice. Foresight-Russia, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 16-25
(in Russ.)]
Ссылки
- На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.